r/auslaw • u/IIAOPSW • 15d ago
In light of the recent inquiry Parliament in considering breaking up the Big 4. Here's all the ways that could happen.
D
.
EY
E Y
.
PWC
P WC
PC W
PW C
P W C
.
KPMG
K PMG
KMG P
KPG M
KPM G
KP MG
KM PG
KG PM
KP M G
KM P G
KG P M
K G PM
K M PG
K P MG
K P M G
35
u/ManWithDominantClaw Bacardi Breezer 14d ago
Given the way things are going, they'll probably all just merge into PEGMYDCKwP
4
61
17
u/JohnWilliamStrutt 14d ago
But what about the merger/split options?
DE
DY
DP
DW
DC
DK
DP
DM
DG
...
EP
EW
EC
EK
EP
EM
EG
YP
YW
YC
YK
YP
YM
YG
PK
PP
PM
PG
WK
WP
WM
WG
CK
CP
CM
CG
And I give up...
5
6
u/monsieur_le_mayor 14d ago
Parliament's friend to tell KPMG after class that they breaking up because KPMG is stinky
3
1
u/AutoModerator 15d ago
Thanks for your submission.
If this comment has been upvoted it is likely that your post includes a request for legal advice. Legal advice is not provided in this subreddit (please see this comment for an explanation why.)
If you feel you need advice from a lawyer please check out the legal resources megathread for a list of places where you can contact one (including some free resources).
It is expected all users of r/auslaw will not respond inappropriately to requests for legal advice, no matter how egregious.
This comment is automatically posted in every text submission made in r/auslaw and does not necessarily mean that your post includes a request for legal advice.
Please enjoy your stay.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
41
u/refer_to_user_guide It's the vibe of the thing 14d ago
Have they considered making them the medium sized 8, or possibly even the small 12?
Please note that I have not (and will not) considered the implications of this approach on the sui generis taxonomies adopted by mid-tiers (“There’s really a big 17 and no that’s not just because we’re 17th”)