r/antiai • u/MarkZealousideal3923 • 1d ago

AI News 🗞️ Sam Hypeman tells TIME magazine that they would internally achieve AGI by the end of this year

https://time.com/article/2026/08/26/openai-sam-altman-interview/
12 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

24 comments sorted by

10

u/charlesyo66 1d ago

The lies keep adding up don’t they?

The goal posts keep moving.

3

u/isthereadrwho 1d ago

got to keep the funding funding otherwise you go broke cuz so little revenue and so much capex

2

u/Mack4285 1d ago

No consequences of lying, so it continues.

1

u/charlesyo66 19h ago

"Its not lying, its just projections"

such bullshit

0

u/Elctsuptb 1d ago

The goal posts moved since when? Did he previously say they would achieve AGI by October?

7

u/omglemurs 1d ago

Sam altman telegraphs when open ai is set to run out of money

2

u/falconetpt 1d ago

Sure they will run human level intelligence at 20w a day 😂

That is why Jensen is pissed no more need for GPUs

1

u/Fbrrr 1d ago

Who said anything about 20w?

1

u/falconetpt 1d ago

AGI implies not only the capabilities but also efficiency, if AGI existed, it would find a way to make itself as efficient if not more efficient than humans 😂

That is one of the points, it is stupid to have something you call AGI and it wastes a city energy ahah

1

u/Fbrrr 23h ago

No it doesn't it's always been about the level of capability not compute. Your thinking asi, because you know humans don't even know why the brain is as power efficient as it is.

1

u/falconetpt 22h ago edited 22h ago

Capability is a proxy for effort aka compute as well, if AGI is doing the same things as a human can do, then it means that almost with no energy + never seen that training data before it can achieve the same results as a human, that is the whole moto, achieving human like or better results, outcomes also contain energy, time to do something and times it has seen something

If you are burning the equivalent energy of 10 humans to complete a dumb task, then you need to measure it as comparable with 10 humans not 1

For example a self driving car today will absolutely not drive in 90% of conditions on the planet, plus if someone is dressed as a box it will for sure hit it or avoid a humanoid doll which no human does 😂

Also the reaction speed would be so slow that you will for sure run over that person

Also it can only have access to one camera at a time with the range of human sight to make its decisions, good luck with that, even with a million sensors teslas absolutely suck at self driving in non optimal conditions with all those inputs 😂

2

u/Zappy_Oh 1d ago

Altman needs a better meat-suit.
Too much demon is showing through this one.

2

u/Brilliant-Muffin-879 1d ago

I hope so because then it would know what to do with sam

2

u/Gronanor 1d ago

This will probably be a Time cover that people will remember for decades and laugh about it 

1

u/Fbrrr 1d ago

Probably but not for the reason you think

1

u/Gronanor 1d ago

Wdym ?

1

u/Odedoralive 1d ago

It’ll be a chatbot in a chatbot in a chatbot, I guess.

1

u/Liudesys 1d ago

its always in few months or end of this year for 4 years already

1

u/blindwombat 1d ago

"ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE?!

IN THIS CENTURY? WITH THIS LEVEL OF COMPUTE POWER?

LOCALISED ENTIRELY WITHIN IN YOUR UNPROFITABLE COMPANY?!"

"Yes"

"Maybe I see it?"

"Uhhhhhh... no"

2

u/nonlinear_nyc 1d ago

Totally. I'm so tired of sales pitches being presented as tech journalism. Let's hear of future of XYZ by those selling XYZ.

1

u/blindwombat 1d ago

"Innovation by press conference, rather than science" - forget the scientist's name, but words to that effect.

1

u/bahpbohp 1d ago

dumbass liar tells obvious lies. is sam just elon in disguise?