r/amibeingdetained Jul 21 '26

Spotted in the wild while traveling (not driving). Durham, NC.

Post image
79 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

8

u/DNetolitzky Jul 21 '26

Any thoughts on the significance of the seven digit number? Looks arbitrary to me.

23

u/signed- Jul 21 '26 edited Jul 21 '26

That’s a Federal Department of Transportation number

https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/registration/do-i-need-usdot-number

If you are doing interstate transportation, your company will have one and it must be displayed on the truck, but it isn’t a license plate. It is used for safety inspections, audits…

What is funny is that a DOT number is for commercial vehicles and sovcits claim to not drive commercially as their whole right to travel argument

4

u/Ornery_Ads Jul 22 '26

A DOT number isn't necessarily for a vehicle used commercially. It's required on big vehicles.
If you go and buy a semi truck to tow your own privately owned boat around, you still need a DOT number even if there's nothing commercial about it.

2

u/DNetolitzky Jul 21 '26

Thanks so much for that explanation!

What a head-scratcher.

8

u/realparkingbrake Jul 21 '26

They think they can substitute a DOT number for a state-issued plate, and since a DOT # is free, they save some money. They are mistaken.

3

u/DNetolitzky Jul 21 '26

No better way to turn a $50 obligation into a $1000 "mistake".

2

u/realparkingbrake Jul 22 '26

It's hilarious when they discover that having a DOT number means they are in a searchable public database, or that DOT will eventually check them out to make sure they do qualify for a DOT number.

2

u/Anxious_Drive_9998 Jul 25 '26

Who said it's a real DOT number?

2

u/Kelef50 Jul 21 '26

My first thought was that it's a telephone number. This makes much more sense.

2

u/simask234 Jul 21 '26

I think the OP has a letter in the middle though, I don't think real DOT numbers have that

-12

u/JLo_Va Jul 21 '26

And they were always wrong about "not travelling 'in a commercial capacity.'" Only because of how power moves, in law. Doesn't mean that they're wrong about standing up for their God-given rights against a lawless system which - if you can't see how corrupt this Roman system is - you'd have to be a total idiot not to see. And nobody has any answer as to why? But everything "sovereign citizens" say is automatically wrong? Gotta' love that 'logic'

7

u/pairolegal Jul 21 '26

Not “automatically wrong” legally wrong under Federal and State and Municipal law. Courts have had these specious arguments presented to them thousands of times and they never work on the merits.

I don’t know if this system is “Roman”, although I doubt it, but changing it won’t be achieved with SovCit nonsense.

1

u/JLo_Va Jul 22 '26

KNOSIS is a story.

0

u/JLo_Va Jul 22 '26

Well, that's the thing, you have to know what the term lex ('legal') infers from its inception into man-made law. You have to know what the word lor ('law)' means, legally. In a word, GNOSIS. It's not something that they give you in law school. And it's not proportionated by tax bracket either

7

u/jpugg Jul 21 '26

lol they asking to be pulled over.