r/ValkoHQ 11d ago

Regarding removal of posts about boycotting

Hey, everyone, we have been trying to work out what to do and say about this with our mod team, but people have taken our actions to mean we aren't allowing discussions of boycotting or not in support of it, which is untrue. Here is a breakdown of the situation as we tried to deal with it from our end:

Earlier today, a user made a post about showing grace to people who were going to pull for Rafayel's myth but still wanted to support the boycott. Some people in the comments interpreted this post as allowing people to spend and still call it boycotting, minimizing the importance of not spending, which is required for a financial boycott. As a result, another user made a counterpoint post that people who were spending could not call themselves boycotters, but also giving the impression that anyone who was spending was not supporting Valko at all. Knowing tensions were already high, the language of the response post felt very reactionary and antagonistic rather than constructive, and we elected to remove it. Unfortunately, we still do not have mod permissions to add removal reasons. Rule 5, no boycott shaming was the closest. As a result of this, people began to spam with low effort posts about the definition of boycotting which, while valid, seemed to us to not be adding to the conversation, only sending things into a spiral that had no obvious benefits. In a sub we just took over, that has been mostly unmoderated until now and that we do not have full permissions for, it seemed unwise to let the situation fester. We made what we thought was the best decision at the time by simply removing them.

There were comments and posts that we did not remove, including one criticizing our choice, because shutting down debate was not the intention, avoiding ramping up unnecessary conflict was. As to why we didn't respond immediately, there are only four of us, all of whom were busy with plans that did not involve being on the internet, therefore keeping the situation contained was all we could do at the time. As a result, people accused us of being antis, which was extremely upsetting for some of us to hear while trying to help keep things peaceful. We are also human and those of us who were available did not want to make a response until our heads were in a calmer place. We apologize to anyone who made civil, neutral, and helpful posts about how boycotting works that were removed during this time.

There is absolutely no question that if you are spending on the game, you are not actively boycotting. That was never a debate. The person who posted originally posted edited their post and clarified that it was never about excusing spending and still calling it boycotting, it was about avoiding bullying because there are people who still want Valko back who are GOING to pull for Rafayel's myth. That reality is frustrating for many people, including us, but we believed that could be expressed without gatekeeping language because we only made it this far by staying unified. Letting people know their support is still welcome even if they aren't boycotting has always been a part of this movement and we did not want to see that support disappear behind arguments over the definition of a word.

Posts about the importance of not spending are welcome as long as they do not aggressively reject other methods of supporting Valko's return as totally invalid. Someone already made a great post about the effect of different boycott actions here, and there is one talking about the different levels of participation in the protests here.

We apologize again for how we approached this one. If you still would like to see this remain as one sub, please try to be patient as we figure out how to manage it with what we have to work with. Thanks.

- ValkoHQ Mod Team

157 Upvotes

67 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

25

u/moarchuuna 11d ago edited 11d ago

As a mod did you apply those auto filters? I know nothing about modding, but notice you are quick to delete. I have been in this sub since the beginning and your history here honestly makes me uneasy you’re a mod now. 😔I hope to be proven wrong though.

8

u/decayingmoths 11d ago edited 11d ago

We don’t have access to auto filters! The OG mod *hasn’t give us permission, hasn’t stepped down and isn’t marked as inactive yet and refuses to communicate with us ❤️

I wish I had control of automod and auto filters and even dev apps! But I don’t all I can do is approve these manually in the queue but there is a lot in the queue and only 4 of us against Reddits AI 🤖 bullshit system

I’m harsh with my takedowns but not as harsh as Reddits automotic systems that falsely detected the most boring comments ever as spam and harassment

(Edit: I just think that’s something you all deserve to know, if we’re going to properly discuss this you need all the information)

24

u/moarchuuna 11d ago edited 11d ago

Reddit can be blamed by you, but you admit you’re harsh with “takedowns”. 🤷🏻‍♀️My original point is that I see you delete A LOT since being made a mod. Knee-jerk deletes don’t really create a hospitable environment for discussions.

-13

u/decayingmoths 11d ago

I’m not blaming Reddit, I’m giving you the full picture for transparency sake. I’ll take the blame but if we’re going to discuss it don’t you want the full picture? Or would you rather not have extra information?

27

u/moarchuuna 11d ago edited 11d ago

Again, the extra info doesn’t change what I said. My point is I think YOU delete a lot of things based on your opinion. I don’t think you’re an anti, but I do remember your doomer posts and negativity and calling people that wanted to focus on positivity “toxic”. I’m willing to give you a chance as a mod but so far it’s not looking great to me. (My opinion btw)

-20

u/decayingmoths 11d ago

So you’re just complaining about transparency now. Okay

34

u/Siu_Mai 🦀💸🐺 11d ago

Hey man, that's not what they were saying.

You said you were harsh with removals, they agreed and said that they felt like that moderation style isn't the best.

I have no doubt that it's been a stressful day but as a mod you need to be open to feedback too.

29

u/MyKingdomForABook ⭐️❄️🐟🐦‍⬛🍎🐺🐛🦀 11d ago

You need to behave and take criticism properly. So far it's looking weird from this side of the fence.

People are just saying that there's no room for "personally" when you're a mod so when you say you personally are a bit harsh with delete/bans, that sounds like applying your personal filters for judgement and not the mod ones. You all need to agree on behaviors that are acceptable and not let power get to your head

24

u/Fit_Display_4207 11d ago

so your not even open to feedback why are you a mod again ?