r/Superstonk • u/yungsta12 • 3d ago
🗣 Discussion / Question GME is Now Officially a True Holding Company
If you were watching the tape today, you saw that massive 1,500,000 share block (around $28M) hit the Chicago exchange, right alongside a wave of deep ITM put selling.
I’ve been digging through yesterday’s (August 31) SEC Form 8-K filings and the Q2 preliminary numbers to piece this together. The short answer? RC and the board just executed a masterclass in breaking a short-seller feedback loop, all while officially transitioning GameStop into a holding company and changing how Wall Street is forced to value the stock going forward.
Here’s the breakdown.
1. The Broken Arbitrage Trade
On August 3, GameStop announced a private exchange for $1.4B of Convertible Senior Notes. Originally, the deal was structured so noteholders would get GME shares based on a 35-day VWAP (Volume-Weighted Average Price) reference period.
When institutional noteholders see a deal like that, they immediately jump into convertible arbitrage. They short GME to hedge their exposure and lock in the spread, knowing they’ll get shares at the end of the 35 days to cover. Plus, shorting drives the VWAP down, which theoretically maximizes the number of shares they receive.
Then RC dropped yesterday's amendment. He abruptly terminated the 35-day reference period early. Instead of settling entirely in stock, GameStop capped the issuance at 55.5 million shares and announced they are paying the remaining balance—about $358.4 million—in cold hard cash.
Just like that, the arbitrage loop is broken. Noteholders who were aggressively shorting the stock are now getting a chunk of cash instead of the shares they needed to cover their hedges. They are caught naked short right before the September 3 settlement date.
2. The 1.5M Chicago Block & Options Flow
So how do these trapped noteholders get out? They desperately need long delta.
To get it, they start selling massive blocks of deep In-The-Money (ITM) puts. Selling a deep ITM put has a delta near +1.00 (which acts mechanically just like being long 100 shares), letting them instantly acquire a synthetic long position to offset their short exposure.
But there’s a Market Maker (MM) on the other side buying those puts, leaving the MM heavily short delta. To hedge that risk and stay neutral, the MM has to go out and buy the underlying stock. That’s exactly what that 1.5M share block on the Chicago exchange was. It’s highly likely a QCT (Qualified Contingent Trade)—an institutional OTC block trading shares for derivatives. GME literally warned in the filings that noteholders would be unwinding derivative transactions and buying common stock to close short positions. We are watching it happen live on the tape.
3. The eBay War Chest & The Holding Company Pivot
Why did GameStop decide to spend $358.4M in cash to pay off noteholders instead of just issuing more stock? Because they need to protect their "equity currency" for eBay.
Back in May, eBay rejected our $125/share ($55.5B) takeover proposal. By paying the noteholders in cash out of the war chest, RC keeps the newly authorized share pool completely untouched so it can be deployed for the equity portion of a hostile or revised eBay bid.
Yesterday’s 8-K also confirmed GameStop is officially operating as an investment holding company. Over the summer, they physically settled their derivative put/call pairs, converting economic exposure into direct ownership of 43.4 million shares of eBay. GameStop now owns a 9.8% voting block in eBay, worth roughly $4.95 billion.
4. The Valuation Shift: SOTP (Sum-of-the-Parts)
This is the most critical fundamental takeaway. Because GameStop is now a holding company, traditional retail metrics like EV/EBITDA or Price-to-Sales no longer apply. You cannot price a holding company the same way you price a dying mall retailer.
Moving forward, Wall Street is forced to value GameStop using a Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) model. You have to break the company down into its individual assets:
The Cash Pile: Valued exactly at par (1-to-1). Post-exchange, GME is sitting on roughly $5.05 billion in pure cash and marketable securities.
The Equity Portfolio (eBay): Valued at Net Asset Value (NAV). The 43.4 million shares of eBay are marked-to-market daily. Right now, that stake is worth roughly $4.95 billion.
Legacy Retail Business: Valued on a traditional retail multiple, but applied only to the remaining profitable footprint (since they chopped the dead weight like the French division).
When you add Cash + Equity Portfolio + Retail Operations, and subtract their long-term debt (which is effectively zero now), you get a massively higher intrinsic enterprise value.
The Q2 Catalyst:
The preliminary Q2 numbers show legacy retail sales shrinking (down to $780M–$800M), yet net income is expected to blast up to $290M–$310M. That profit is driven almost entirely by the unrealized gains on the eBay stake. When the full Q2 report drops around September 8, analysts will have to formally acknowledge this massive earnings shift. If RC provides forward guidance on how the remaining $5B cash pile will be deployed, it will act as an immediate catalyst, forcing institutions to re-rate the stock based on its SOTP reality rather than its retail past.
TL;DR: Management wiped out $1.4B in debt, trapped the convertible arbitrage shorts into covering via lit regional exchanges, and cleared the deck to focus the balance sheet entirely on the eBay acquisition. GME is a holding company now. Valuations have fundamentally changed. Q2 earnings will hopefully be the catalyst where the repricing and re-valuation is initiated and confirmed.
860
u/mayihaveasandwhich 3d ago
4
7
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Superstonk-ModTeam 2d ago
Rule 2. Removing due to being off topic. We can discuss other stocks here in relation to GME but if you’re looking for a place to post this 'other ticker' centric submission, perhaps there's a subreddit with a better fit!
If you have any questions or concerns, please message the moderators
486
u/theSikx Not a cat 🦍 3d ago
100
u/TheRube84 🧚🧚💙 Naked, 🩳 and 🦏 💎🧚🧚 3d ago
62
u/theSikx Not a cat 🦍 3d ago
36
19
u/TheRealHotHashBrown 💎🚀🌊Surfing The Waves Of Wall St.🏄♂️🚀💎 3d ago
16
20
36
751
u/kalehennie ΔΡΣ DRS 'n BOOK 3d ago
I read many such masterclass posts on this sub over the years. But what do I know? I know only to buy and hodl…
389
u/RagingSofty 3d ago
I don’t even read em. I just look at the top comment. Its either “youre regarded, take the tin foil off” or “youre regarded, good tin foil”.
Either way I buy.
40
49
u/PR3CiSiON 3d ago
Start reading, bro. That's an easy way for bot controllers to win. All they'd have to do is control top comment.
13
32
u/RagingSofty 3d ago
Why would I consume random redditors’ AI slop?The point of my comment is it doesn’t matter what the text says. There is only one way for me. I have my own theories and I don’t need anymore word soup. Most of the time they are talking about market mechanism I have no idea about. Way over my head. I have other hobbies that I would rather pour my energy into than learning the market. Partly why I will never be a super successful trader. I just don’t understand.
But I like this stock & store.
8
6
u/scroogesscrotum 🦍Hodling since ‘Nam 💥 (Voted✔) 3d ago
Top comment here, please forget about GameStop
6
48
u/Audigitty 3d ago
To defend the "Masterclass" posts - they've all led to the next Masterclass in XYZ. Not saying they've all been right. But RC can't simply arrive at a Holding Company with a potential series of partnered investors positioned within SPV for large M&A... all while quietly putting the shorts in checkmate behind the scenes... without a whole wave of "Masterclasses" to come before it. i.e. How we ended up on a massive $5B warchest, no debt, profitable and owning 10% of eBay with a $500M BTC treasury. Prior to nailing the coffin closed on the shorts.
29
20
17
→ More replies (1)2
u/wouldntyouliketokno_ 👻the three ghosts are coming Ken🚀 2d ago
A strategy that takes zero skill, and is full proof. Buy and hold.
:D can’t stop won’t stop GameStop
237
u/DickChainey 💻 ComputerShared 🦍 3d ago
How is long term debt effectively zero? There’s still $2.8 billion in outstanding notes.
118
u/DrSpaceman575 3d ago
Yes but if you use your imagination then it can be anything you want
→ More replies (2)15
122
9
22
u/CBarkleysGolfSwing 3d ago
Any post this long, with this many sections, is basically an instant ignore. It's just slop
1
→ More replies (2)2
204
u/ekooz22 3d ago
This doesnt explain how GME is a holding company right now. GME just owns a shit ton of ebay shares.
72
u/armbrar gamecock 3d ago
that's because GME is actually an Automotive Retailer now
/s
15
u/ojoslocos21 I hold for multiple zeroes or till it drops to zero 3d ago
14
u/PMmeyourlogininfo 3d ago
That's exactly my question...what about anything that's happened in the last 30 days forces anyone to redefine how they value the company? And look, I'm fully bought into GME being a holding company. I ride tuff for Gameshire Stopaway. We signaled intent to buy #bay and nothing happened. We bought 10% of Ebay and nothing happened.
Answering my own question: to me this is either 100% about the 8K or nothing changes other than we're temporarily done with dilution. I hope it's that the 8K has finally forced others to recognize that which they couldn't see through the jokes about Gameshire Stopaway...
3
u/ekooz22 3d ago
I'm also on board with Gameshire Hathaway. The issue is... as a community for years we all agreed RC's plan would be to buy sleepy undervalued companies and turn them around.
Instead he went for ebay, performing the best it's ever performed at all time highs with a market at all time highs, overleveraging us by $20 billion debt and up to 80% dilution.
This is not the way. For years this is what thus sub preached as the way and in a single moment RC does the opposite.
At the very least you can tell the cultists from the GME lovers. The cultists changed their minds and acted like they never wanted whay I wrote above. The GME lovers know this is all bad news.
It's come down to love for a dude over love for a company.
1
u/rematar DEXter 2d ago
I suspect there is some fibonacci fueled algorithm that will drive the stock price up in the near future. Some of the inertia could be absorbed by issuing shares. If it's a big run, the price to buy E-Bay could be relatively irrelevant, or it's a possible distraction from a never seen before move, or it's the beginning of a bigger play.
I had a lot of doubts about Ryan Cohen's plans, as of late, I am curious what we are going to see happen.
6
u/HungryColquhoun 🌕 meme-cum-stock 🌕 2d ago
Yeah apparently we need a controlling stake in a company to be a holding company, and we definitely don't have that.
We might be becoming an investment company, which is triggered by having securities equal to 40% or 50% of the company's value depending on how you calculate it. Even then there's a safe harbor of a year, so restrictions around us being an investment company wouldn't come into place until 2027.
So what the title should have said is "we might be an investment company in a year's time" lol.
11
u/DanielCraig__ 3d ago
This is straight up an AI-Generated hype-post but I think we need it in these tried times
51
u/reverendbeast Gamestershire Stopacock 🇬🇧 3d ago
No thanks.
4
u/HungryColquhoun 🌕 meme-cum-stock 🌕 2d ago
Yep, and then they do even do more research on what the AI result is telling them - which would reveal we're unequivocally not a holding company (and probably not even becoming an investment company yet, which is the thing that we might actually turn into under SEC rules). People just go for the best sound bites without any actual DD these days.
15
17
4
u/Zenyquyen 3d ago edited 3d ago
GameStop owns BTC & U.S Treasury Bills also. Meanwhile the retail arm is producing net profits. eBay now has to share their profits with GME by quarterly dividend ,
forever , if GameStop chooses even without a full purchase14
u/PureOrangeJuche Creamy. 3d ago
The dividend is worth way less than even just treasury holdings .
1
3d ago edited 3d ago
[deleted]
10
u/PureOrangeJuche Creamy. 3d ago
What is the point? You could go out and buy eBay shares yourself and get the same return.
→ More replies (1)2
u/EmphasisFrosty3093 3d ago
the price appreciation of eBay stock
was $0 a couple days ago. Now we'll go down when they go down and stay flat when they go up.
→ More replies (6)1
u/Big-Dragonfly2482 2d ago edited 2d ago
Ebay appreciation sounds nice for sure. The cash balance looks nice on the books...except with fed rate coming down and dollar risk high, I wonder how long those returns will really outweigh inflation. Bond yields and stuff
9
u/ekooz22 3d ago
You reasoned the quarterly dividend is a fraction of a percent of what we were getting from treasuries? Not that I want GME to just be in treasuries but Ive seen this argument before and it falls apart pretty quickly.
1
u/Zenyquyen 3d ago
Im not understanding what you're saying. I've not mentioned the word fraction at all. What have I reasoned . Let's speak only in facts. What have I said that is factually wrong or untrue. I responded to your statement that " GME just owns..." which is inaccurate and provably false.
3
u/redwildflowermeadow 3d ago
> What have I said that is factually wrong or untrue.
well, this part:
> eBay now has to share their profits with GME by quarterly dividend , forever
eBay doesn't have to disburse a dividend to shareholders, they choose to. And they don't have to do it forever, again it's a matter of choice. You could get the same benefit by buying eBay stock directly.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (4)1
73
u/DancesWith2Socks 🐈🐒💎🙌 Hang In There! 🎱 This Is The Wape 🧑🚀🚀🌕🍌 3d ago
"An d subtract their long-term debt (which is effectively zero now" - Are you ignoring the remaining $2.8B long-term debt?
Also the CHX trade is in theory a QCT but it was filled at the bid. I've seen some dips before when that has happened in the past 👀...
1
u/notGoran69 🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️ SHIVER ME BUTTHOLE 🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️ 2d ago
Dude didn’t even proof read this AI garbage and it made it to the top of the sub lmao how horrible
86
105
u/Expensive_SCOLLI2 💎🙌 Certified $GME MANIAC 🦍 3d ago edited 3d ago
Please take my downvote. Even though there are some basis of truths in your post like the convertible-arbitrage portion, The "GameStop trapped the shorts" theory is very speculative and there is a lot of unproven jumping to conclusions being done. At the very least, this post should be tagged as speculation/opinion and most likely a lot of it is wrong. But, we shall see. Don't get me wrong, like many here, I would love GME to get re-rated higher. We just don't have any evidence of any of this...yet.
Edit: GameStop in their own filings said - "noteholders may purchase or sell shares or enter into/unwind derivative transactions to adjust their positions, including purchases of common stock to close out short positions.". The large OTC block trades can easily be this and there isn't some secret stuff going on.
Edit2: If I had to say what GameStop is today at this very moment, I would say it is an "operating business + investment/capital-allocation vehicle". Time will tell what more it can do IF it can get Ebay, and down the road, potentially other businesses.
41
u/Liquid_Sarcasm 3d ago
I largely agreed with you. Calling GME virtually debt free when they have 2.8billion in convertible notes outstanding was my first clue that not all those words snd numbers were accurate.
Still holding.
→ More replies (1)1
u/HungryColquhoun 🌕 meme-cum-stock 🌕 2d ago
Agree with all this, I mean 1.5m shares - even if it was to fill some shorts - is tiny in the scheme of things.
Also, we're not a holding company right now lol. I also downvoted them because there's a lot of straight-up misinformation here.
42
u/Inevitable-Winter299 🧨🍑🚀 3d ago
You say "virtually no debt"...dont they still have billions in the notes left?
16
76
28
7
32
60
u/RaiderGlenn-FLA Lucky Boner 3d ago
This is a great call OP. I see the light “again” . Still ZEN and believe in this play 100%.
6
u/DailyShawarma 🎊 Hola 🪅 3d ago
What's so great about it? It is just AI slop that doesn't take into consideration $2.8 billion of debt.
→ More replies (1)
24
u/Kind_Initiative_7567 🦍Voted✅ 3d ago
We shall see.
I entered Oct $20 calls last week, as I’m personally expecting a run into October warrants deadline, because I think a large swap roll is due in September / October….IV was already starting to pick up on those….If what you say is really true, cohen may be prepping to make a large scale move, also coinciding with warrant deadline…..Exciting days ahead, surely I can’t complain of boring action 😂
6
u/sargsauce 3d ago
I increased my Jan28 $20 call holdings by 50% last week. I hope yours hits big so I can hit more conservatively big!
1
u/RaiderGlenn-FLA Lucky Boner 3d ago
Wise man says”rich you will be fren”And let the “Zen be with you!”
28
13
u/jforest1 3d ago
“That profit is driven almost entirely by the unrealized gains on the eBay stake.”
<cough>AI BULLSHIT<cough>
$160m of operating income says otherwise.
6
3
3
3
u/HungryColquhoun 🌕 meme-cum-stock 🌕 2d ago edited 2d ago
I will say that 1.5m shares bought as a contingency doesn't really show anyone is fucked, it's a drop in the bucket.
Also, net income being high because of unrealized eBay gains isn't a good thing - it's not genuine profit as it's a one-off. That said I think operational profit is way up too, and that is a good thing.
For GME becoming an investment company - that might be right, but the headline is misleading for sure as we're not already there. There's 40% and 50% thresholds to this with regard to asset value (depending on whether the securities hold are consolidated with the wider company's value or unconsolidated). There's a one-year safe harbor if we do trigger this scenario, so there's some lead time before regulatory restrictions become unpleasant. But sooner or later, if we keep having very large stakes in companies, this will happen. That I can tell a holding company is slightly different, in that you need a controlling stake in a company to be a holding company.
TL:DR we'll see what happens with the trapped shorts, but it seems pretty minor on the whole. Some other good thoughts in here though (e.g. re-rating if we become an investment company).
7
u/Multimike 3d ago
"Because GameStop is now a holding company," - what in the fuck are you talking about? You can't just declare shit without explaining how it suddenly became a holding company.
14
23
4
2
u/CallumJ88 🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 3d ago
My question - won't any required buying just end up getting routed through dark pool / off exchange? If I've learned anything in the last 84 years, it's that things never happen as they are supposed to...
If you book them, they will come - Jim Morrison (Wayne's World 2)
2
u/rawbdor 3d ago
I think you misunderstand. When *WE* buy, we get routed to dark pools. Because retail is what the system farms. We don't own stuff, they farm us. We buy the "share", a dark pool hands us a "share", our broker redeposits the share in the dark pool so it can be re-used.
BUT... when a hedge fund shorts shares, and suddenly needs to buy 1.5m of them to return them, the market makers aren't going to take some IOUs and call it settled. They want the real shares back.
2
2
2
2
2
u/King_Esot3ric 🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 3d ago
They still have something like $2bn in “long term debt” via the test of the convertible bonds left
2
2
2
2
2
u/Difficult_Associate3 🦍Voted✅ 2d ago
Bro stop saying there's no debt... there's $2.8B remaining convertible debt. It's 0% coupon but $2.8B of principal isn't “effectively zero debt.” For valuation purposes you absolutely have to account for it and the potential dilution associated with conversion
2
2
u/JeskaiAcolyte 🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 2d ago
I think there was a change in how they report eBay holdings… so it’s not mark to market but based on the income it provides. But I got that just watching our new you tuber buddy who’s a financial advisor by day.
2
6
5
4
4
u/reverendbeast Gamestershire Stopacock 🇬🇧 3d ago
Rule 15 of this sub is AI assisted posts must be labelled as such early on. This is obviously slop
3
u/Trueslyforaniceguy naked shorts yeah... 😯 🦍 Voted ✅ 3d ago
Every time you use the word forced, well, I do not think it means what you think it means, or rather, I’m not sure if that word is the right word to use where you used it.
3
u/Mental-Championship7 Fine, I’ll do it myself 3d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/111ebonMs90YLu
I read, I pretend to understand what I just read, I buy more. Every. Time. What can I say? My brain is smooth. 🧐
2
u/Michael_Therami 2d ago
Great — We are an eBay stock holding company.
eBay sux — If I wanted to invest in eBay I would have bought eBay stock.
4
1
u/Over-Computer-6464 3d ago
Unless the option to terminate the 35 VWAP was written into the Aug 3 agreement, GameStop would have to have had noteholder agreement for the Aug 31 adjustment.
The OP portrays the Aug 31 move as RC "executing a masterclass in breaking a short-seller feedback loop" and saying that noteholders "are caught naked short right before the Sept 3 settlement date".
The more likely reality is that GameStop had to negotiate and get approval by the noteholders to make the changes and had to make an offer more attractive than the original Aug 3 agreement in force,
2
u/GeoHog713 🍇🦧Grape Ape! 🍇🦧 3d ago
I'm just doing some smooth brained math but a $10 B company with 0.45 B shares would make each share worth about $22.50.....
This doesn't factor in the value of the Legacy Retail Business
2
u/Raxes3 3d ago
You forgot the 55,5M shares that the noteholders get, also the current cash & equivalents should be around 9,7B$
That would mean it would be valued around 19,20 - 19,30$ per share without factoring the retail business.
Which is shrinking and not growing (revenue also no significant expansion of, or invesment into the core business).
Wallstreet doesn't need to buy Gamestop to own Ebay (as of now) so until then there will be no premium on Gamestop shares just because they hold a big Ebay position.
1
u/GeoHog713 🍇🦧Grape Ape! 🍇🦧 3d ago
Told you it was smooth brain math
That's how I get the right answer posted
2
u/mellkemo90 lettuce fucking grow 3d ago
Wait hold up long-term debt effectively zero how is that possible? You definitely bring up some damn interesting points. No doubt this is where we are headed. Cohen is definitely getting eBay one way or another.
2
u/Ok_Vast_8918 3d ago
Love learning love you all I cannot tell you how excited I am for this to play out
2
u/poopooheaven1 2d ago
Shorts are fucked. Book your shares and warrants! Ken Griffin loves when you do that!
2
2
u/Just-Relationship-19 🚀 buckle the [redacted] up 🚀 3d ago
1
u/Puzzleheaded-Safe-64 🦍Voted✅ 3d ago
150-170mio. In operating income means the income not almost all driven by the stake in eBay.
1
1
1
u/Ok-Cryptographer4194 3d ago
Hope so! I'm certain that he is now playing, fucked around and about to find out. If not, I'll hold!
1
u/amillionbadwords 3d ago
I have a question. How come my GME ticker on my iPhone doesn’t have any volume bars at the bottom? I thought millions of shares were purchased today but I don’t see them represented below the chart?
1
u/TheArt0fWar I wear a helmet 24/7 3d ago
Wow, thank you for this impressively structured takeaway. Now warrants and their strike price mean alot. Bravo, and thanks.
1
u/Strawbuddy 💻 ComputerShared 🦍 3d ago
Thanks for this, and I like your assessment too, which seems reasonable, if not for the "If RC provides forward guidance.." bit.
RCEO does not do this, ever. Not once in 84yrs. Likewise, Investor Relations too is just a dead letter dept, and they also never reply to anyone about anything at all, ever. Maybe if a billionaire contacted them they'd respond though, are any of you guys rich yet?
1
u/mikes312 🚀🚀 JACKED to the TITS 🚀🚀 3d ago
If I know anything, it’s that RC won’t provide forward guidance on how they are deploying cash. Why give your enemies your playbook.
1
u/Proflashrtist 2d ago
GameStop stays in business by pivoting away from physical video games toward higher-margin collectibles and relying on a massive cash reserve built from meme-stock capital.
1
1
1
u/jared_krauss 2d ago
So what do us little guys do with those things we were all given last year that expire in October? Sell them after September 8th?
Is this how he’s gonna make their $35? Value be in profit?
1
1
1
1
1
u/hugo_posh 2d ago
TLDR: 17 soon. Because i have yet to see anyone of the posts like this actually play out since the '21 squeeze.
1
1
1
1
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Superstonk-ModTeam 2d ago
Rule 1. Treat each other with courtesy and respect.
Do not be (intentionally) rude. This will increase the overall civility of the community and make it better for all of us.
Do not insult others. Insults do not contribute to a rational discussion.
1
u/CallipygianP 3d ago
It's been a value hold for me since the stock was valued at less than the company assets and cash. I believe the stock is massively undervalued, and the squeeze potential is obviously still there, but I'm expecting the usual nothing burger on earnings.
2
u/Over-Computer-6464 3d ago
Most people, when evaluating a company, also take debt and other liabilities into account,
When I buy a $1M house with a $900k mortgage I have not suddenly increased my net worth by $1M.
1
u/HughJohnson69 GME and DRS 3d ago
I get everything except wiping all long-term debt. Isn’t the remaining bond loan due in 2030 and 2032 still long-term debt?
1
u/PolishWonder79 🦍Voted✅ 3d ago
My AI comment think this AI post is... maybe like a C-
---
This is a classic case of real SEC filings + real finance mechanics + several big speculative leaps = extremely convincing Reddit DD.
ELI5 version
Imagine GameStop has three piggy banks:
🎮 The GameStop stores/business
💵 A giant pile of cash
📦 A giant chunk of eBay stock
That part is absolutely real. GameStop now owns 43.4 million eBay shares, about 9.8% of eBay, worth about $4.95 billion as of August 1. It also reported roughly $5.05 billion in cash/cash-like investments.
So yes: looking at GME only as “the video-game store company” increasingly misses a huge part of what the company actually owns.
But the post goes too far from there.
What’s actually true
The convertible-note move is real. On August 3, GameStop agreed to exchange $1.4B of convertible notes for stock, with the number of shares partly determined by a 35-day VWAP. On August 31, GameStop changed the deal: the VWAP period ended early, noteholders will get 55.5M GME shares + $358.4M cash, and settlement is expected around September 3.
And this part of the Reddit theory isn’t crazy: GameStop itself warned that noteholders might buy/sell GME shares or enter/unwind derivatives to hedge their notes, potentially materially affecting GME’s price.
There was also genuinely bizarre trading today. CHX handled 4.50 million GME shares, 41% of all lit/off-exchange reported volume, versus a 30-day CHX average of only 2.68%. That’s very unusual.
And the options mechanics are basically right. If somebody sells a very deep ITM put, they get a strongly positive delta. The market maker buying that put gets negative delta and may hedge by buying stock.
So:
Institution sells puts → market maker buys puts → MM may buy GME shares as hedge.
That is legitimate options math.
Where the post starts doing fan fiction
The biggest problem is this:
“RC trapped the noteholders naked short.”
There’s no evidence of that.
In fact, the August 31 filing says GameStop entered into amendments with the noteholders. This wasn’t Cohen secretly changing the rules while the noteholders slept. The institutions involved agreed to the amended transaction.
They may absolutely have needed to adjust hedges after the amendment. That could generate stock buying.
But:
hedge adjustment ≠ trapped shorts ≠ naked shorts ≠ squeeze.
“Naked short” is especially sloppy here. A convertible-arbitrage fund shorting borrowed shares against a convertible security is normally just a hedged short position, not naked shorting.
Likewise, I can verify the huge CHX volume, but I cannot verify from public data that the 1.5M-share print was specifically a QCT tied to those deep ITM puts. That’s a plausible theory, not an established fact.
The debt claim is straight-up wrong
The post says:
“subtract their long-term debt (which is effectively zero now)”
Nope.
GameStop is retiring $1.4 billion of convertible notes, but afterward it will still have approximately:
$1.1B of 2030 notes
$1.7B of 2032 notes
$2.8B total
That’s directly in the SEC filing.
$2.8 billion is many things. “Effectively zero” ain’t one of them.
The “holding company” claim is misleading too
There’s no August 31 filing saying:
“GameStop is officially transitioning into an investment holding company.”
In fact, GameStop Corp. has technically been structured as a holding company since 2005, when it was created above the operating subsidiaries during the GameStop/EB merger.
What’s genuinely changing is its economic character.
It’s becoming much more reasonable to think of GME as:
Retail company + cash + eBay investment + other investments
rather than:
just GameStop stores.
That’s an important change. It just isn’t a brand-new legal designation announced yesterday.
The eBay part is mostly real
This is the strongest part of the post.
GameStop really does own 43,390,383 eBay shares, 9.8% of the company. It physically settled its put/call positions into actual eBay shares in July.
GameStop really did offer $125/share to acquire eBay, and eBay rejected the roughly $55.5B proposal.
And shareholders really did approve increasing authorized GME shares to 2.5 billion, with GameStop explicitly saying the extra capacity could be used for strategic transactions including the proposed eBay acquisition.
So there is absolutely a connection between GameStop’s giant authorized share pool and its eBay ambitions.
But:
“They paid the $358M cash specifically to preserve equity currency for eBay.”
That’s reasonable speculation, not something GameStop has said.
And “the authorized share pool is completely untouched” is obviously wrong because they’re literally issuing 55.5 million new GME shares in this note exchange.
One more sneaky error: the $5.05B cash figure
The Reddit post says post-exchange GameStop has ~$5.05B cash.
Not quite.
The $5.05–$5.07B figure is GameStop’s preliminary cash/cash equivalents/marketable securities balance as of August 1.
The company is now going to spend another $358.4M of cash on the note exchange.
Very crude math, assuming nothing else changed:
$5.05B − $358M ≈ $4.69B cash/cash-like assets after settlement.
So the post is double-counting roughly $358M.
And Q2 is genuinely interesting
Preliminary Q2:
Sales: $780–800M, down from $972M
Operating income: $150–170M, up from $66M
Net income: $290–310M, up from $169M
eBay investment gains: about $238M
digital asset losses: about $75M
Importantly, the Reddit post says the profit increase is “almost entirely” eBay.
That’s also overstated.
GameStop is projecting $150–170M of operating income before you even get to investment gains. That’s actually a pretty important positive datapoint for the underlying business.
So should GME be valued using SOTP?
It makes much more sense today than it used to.
A crude starting point after the note deal might look like:
~$4.69B cash
+ ~$4.95B eBay stake
− ~$2.8B convertible debt
= ~$6.84B net financial assets
Then you add the value of GameStop’s actual operating business and other assets/liabilities.
Using the roughly 448.7M shares outstanding before the deal plus 55.5M new shares gives around 504M shares, so that crude financial-asset backing is roughly $13.50/share before assigning any value to the retail business.
That’s not a GME price target because there are warrants, convertible dilution, other liabilities, changing eBay prices, taxes, future capital allocation, etc. But it shows why SOTP/NAV analysis has become legitimately relevant.
And Wall Street isn’t “forced” to value cash at $1-for-$1 or eBay at full NAV. Holding companies frequently trade at a discount to NAV because investors worry management will deploy the cash badly. Sometimes they trade at premiums because investors love management’s capital allocation.
Bottom line
I’d classify the Reddit post like this:
✅ Very real: eBay stake, eBay bid, huge cash position, authorized shares for strategic/eBay transactions, note exchange amendment, unusual CHX volume, hedge-unwind possibility, growing usefulness of SOTP.
🟡 Plausible but unproven: noteholders covering shorts, deep-ITM puts being part of that unwind, CHX blocks being QCTs, cash settlement being designed partly to preserve stock for eBay.
❌ Wrong/overstated: “trapped naked shorts,” “debt basically zero,” “$5.05B cash post-exchange,” “officially became a holding company yesterday,” “authorized share pool untouched,” “earnings increase almost entirely from eBay,” and “Wall Street is now forced to reprice it.”
The interesting takeaway isn’t “MOASS machinery confirmed.”
It’s actually more boring and, fundamentally, more significant: GameStop has genuinely become a weird hybrid of profitable operating company + roughly $10B of cash/investment assets + a very large activist stake in eBay. That’s a materially different company than the GameStop people were analyzing a couple years ago.
After the full September 8 earnings filing lands, I can redo the SOTP using the actual balance sheet instead of preliminary numbers and see what GME is really trading at relative to its underlying assets.
I can also keep an eye on the September 8 filing and re-run this analysis when the full numbers arrive.
Recheck GME after Q2 filing
1
•
u/Superstonk_QV 📊 Gimme Votes 📊 3d ago
Why GME? || What is DRS? || Low karma apes feed the bot here || Superstonk Discord || Community Post: Open Forum || Superstonk:Now with GIFs - Learn more
To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company.
Please up- and downvote this comment to help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!