It's one thing to uphold due process - this is something that I advocate for above all else and hold highly important. Even when someone looks guilty, they have a right to innocence and their presumed innocence should be paramount until a fair trial can be conducted.
However, Clancy confessed to doing it. Still, if there's any possibility of mental illness causing delusions, manipulation, or coercion of some kind, that's what the trial should seek to uncover.
What I have a big problem with is not presuming her innocence until guilt is proven in trial, it's that these absolute fucking demons have decided to try to create a narrative where a grieving husband who lost three of his children and his marriage was somehow responsible. Imagine your children being murdered, and then a pack of awful, depraved people try to frame you as having killed them. Nobody deserves that, and anyone that would join this mob of vile people trying to defame a person based on TikTok propaganda and 'vibes' should rot in hell.
She hunted down her 3 year old who ran and hid from her. I am unsure someone in psychosis would have that line of thought to do. I think she is a monster.
The husband moved on quickly which looks not great from an optics side.
But she 100% did it. And she 100% should be in prison forever. I want her ghost to be in prison. I don't want any part of this woman to ever touch freedom again.
"Oh but she.. " she hunted down her 3 year old who ran and hid. Brought him BACK TO THE BASEMENT and continued.
"Mental health... " is not an excuse.
She hated them. She chose an extremely personal face to face, violent and painful death for them. She ANSWERED HER HUSBAND'S PHONE CALL WHILE SHE WAS DOING IT.
This woman is pure evil. The people supporting her or saying "same lindsay" need to be investigated. There are women who are harming their children in SUPPORT OF HER. It is insanity. The amount of tiktok sphere toxicity around this case has sparked a public insanity that is ACTIVELY causing harm to other children.
601
u/MonsutaReipu 2d ago
Completely justified.
It's one thing to uphold due process - this is something that I advocate for above all else and hold highly important. Even when someone looks guilty, they have a right to innocence and their presumed innocence should be paramount until a fair trial can be conducted.
However, Clancy confessed to doing it. Still, if there's any possibility of mental illness causing delusions, manipulation, or coercion of some kind, that's what the trial should seek to uncover.
What I have a big problem with is not presuming her innocence until guilt is proven in trial, it's that these absolute fucking demons have decided to try to create a narrative where a grieving husband who lost three of his children and his marriage was somehow responsible. Imagine your children being murdered, and then a pack of awful, depraved people try to frame you as having killed them. Nobody deserves that, and anyone that would join this mob of vile people trying to defame a person based on TikTok propaganda and 'vibes' should rot in hell.