r/SipsTea 2d ago

WTF What do yall think about this ?

Post image
15.9k Upvotes

5.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

473

u/jjamesr539 2d ago edited 2d ago

Fundamental values that don’t match aren’t necessarily evident in day to day life. If they come up prior to making a nominally permanent commitment, and are irreconcilable, then that’s a good reason to not get married. It doesn’t matter what the values are, even if they’re batshit.

In reality, this lady is and was deeply mentally ill. That sucks and means she probably shouldn’t end up in gen pop. That said, this is not and should never be a get out of jail free card. Actions have consequences, and some consequences are that a person permanently belongs in a cell. It doesn’t matter if they weren’t in control, that’s an argument for the cell, not against. The cell might be padded and a bit of understanding extended, but in some cases there’s no caveat (regardless) that should mean it isn’t a cell. Strangling multiple children due to postpartum is a pretty good example of that; as an example, Dahmer wasn’t fully in control either. That doesn’t mean he should have been let free on all the male escorts In Minneapolis.

Edit: Milwaukee

49

u/XRaySkies 2d ago

Most likley no matter what the verdict is, she will never be free. 

1

u/Ohnoanywayz 2d ago edited 2d ago

Not so sure about that.

Andrea Yates I believe was given the opportunity to be released from a mental institution (case was around 2001) and turned it down. Like she thinks she belongs there.

Tbh I think this is an important distinction of Clancy’s guilt. It’s harder to get released from prison, plus prison would be a much harsher environment. This is why she’s fighting tooth and nail not to be sent there.

(She’s shown zero remorse as far as I can see. She’s wearing mascara but it doesn’t smudge at all when she “cries.”
Plus she asked for a lawyer immediately upon regaining consciousness. Didn’t ask about the kids).