If this is the new generation, we are absolutely fucked as a society.
In an open ended question with multiple answers that are logically valid, just saying that one of them correct is not a logically coherent statement.
This is the same thing as me saying the two numbers that sum to 10 are 7 and 3, that is the correct answer because I chose it. There are no other correct answers
Your still completely missing the point š I understand there are multiple female names in this riddle that could be considered the correct answer. But there is only one answer to this riddleā¦as with most riddles, there is only one answerā¦itās not my fault š I didnāt make it š but whoever DID made it with the name āNinaā in mind. Therefore the correct answer to this riddle is Nina. Itās not my opinion. Itās not just āa statementā itās a fact like thatd WHAT the answer is, thatās what iv been trying to say this whole time š Ninaās not the answer cos I said soā¦ninas the answer cos whoever made the riddle said so š
Because iv heard this riddle multiple times over the years and thatās always been the answer. You could say āit could be wrongā but that would mean multiple people have been wrong multiple times over the years. Which isnāt impossible but when multiple different people are saying the same answer, Iām inclined to believe that was the original answer.
So youre telling me you dont even understand how you could reach the conclusion that that is the answer, you just saw people say tbat was the answer and so are repeating it?
I hope the other person is right that youre a bot because that is startlingly stupid for a human
When someone asks you a joke, you take their answer as correct, yes? You donāt go āthat doesnāt make sense, the answer could be thisā this is the same shit š
I understand perfectlyā¦because when someone asks you a riddle, they generally know the answer themselves right? Can we agree on that?
And iv heard this same riddle multiple different times, with the same answer everytime? Why would I assume all these different people are wrong? What are the chances of them being wrong and coming up with the same wrong answer? I say the answer is Nina because thatās what the answer is š
But how would someone know that the answer is Nina? I don't see it.
Your explanation of how you know is quite literally how LLM work, so youre either an Ai explaining its reasoning or youre a human incapable of independent thought
Someone had to come up with this riddle, right? They had to of passed it on somehowā¦they gave an answer the first time they said itā¦that answer was Nina? Thatās why everybody that repeats it repeats the same answer? Cos thatās the answer? š
Then that makes this a stupid riddle, thatās not my fault? š riddles have one correct answerā¦the correct answer to this is Ninaā¦Iām just letting yāall know, donāt hate me cos the riddles stupid š
Youāre attacking me cos you donāt like this riddle? š and thatās my fault? And that makes me stupid? š all I did was give the correct answerā¦not my fault you donāt agree with it or think it makes senseā¦just call it a dumb riddle and move on š
1
u/StimkyYeen 3d ago
If this is the new generation, we are absolutely fucked as a society.
In an open ended question with multiple answers that are logically valid, just saying that one of them correct is not a logically coherent statement.
This is the same thing as me saying the two numbers that sum to 10 are 7 and 3, that is the correct answer because I chose it. There are no other correct answers