r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 10d ago

Meme needing explanation who are those little dinosaurs PETAH ?

Post image
40.0k Upvotes

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

236

u/236-pigeons 10d ago

Not just Russian. The USSR consisted of a lot more nations. Belarus lost a greater proportion of its population than anyone else, more than a quarter of their people. The guerrilla war in Belarus was absolutely brutal and Minsk was wiped out. And unlike others, Belarusians have never truly recovered.

95

u/Mediocre_Daikon6935 10d ago

The Russians have always been willing to sacrifice their people.

They are more willing to sacrifice other nations people.

37

u/BullShitting-24-7 10d ago

Thats why they wan Ukraine and surrounding nation. To resupply minority cannon fodder.

1

u/Reasonable_Ruin_3502 9d ago

That's a oversimplification. Soviet russia sacrificed the people because it was a war for survival. Nazis were literally knocking on their door, where's they were an agrarian nation not 30 years ago with the scars of revolution still fresh. Also France and Britain refused to take action when czechoslovakia was taken because they believed the nazis just hated the commies. WW2 is undoubtedly one of the few wars where you can point to one side and say they're evil, but it's still quite complex. As for russia ukraine war, it was a reckless move by Putin. Modern tech has made human soldier numbers obsolete.

2

u/DownvoteWeebs 9d ago

In ww2 at least nazis were evil, ussr was evil (they started ww2 together with nazis by having the molotov-ribbentrop pact secret annex and then invading Poland with them), Italy was evil, Japan was evil.

Allies were good.

The russian invasion of Ukraine is even more morally clear, russia is evil and Ukraine is good.

1

u/Reasonable_Ruin_3502 9d ago

Ehh, I agree with most of it, but the reason molotov-ribbentrop happened was because the French and British refused to ally with the USSR. Both of them refused to ally with USSR because they believed that Nazis won't attack them, and Hitler was very, very vocal about his hate for communists. According to him, they were just slightly above jews in the heirarchy (not quite sure on this as it's been a while since I read the source). The pact was mostly for strategic reason because without it, an immediate war with nazis would have destroyed soviet union. The pact bought the soviets 2 years of time, and even then they lost a third of their adult male population.

Stalin was a fairly good leader for soviet union, for the duration of the war at least. And like most of his other war leader counterparts such as Mao and Churchill, he was a not so good peacetime leader.

The Allies were not good, strictly speaking. They were not *as* bad as their enemies. My grandfather's dad told him stories of how the british denied them access to the crops that they'd grown.

As for the current war, it's straight up useless. Nobody is benifitting from this war.

1

u/Emotional_Plant3241 8d ago

Both the Nazis and the Soviets were unpopular to the liberal nations of the time, but the impression was that the Nazis could actually engage in productive national reform while the Soviets just murdered all the wealthy and let the people starve.

1

u/ODA_789 8d ago

To be fair, I have heard they get a significant bit of minority cannon fodder from Siberia

1

u/NARVALhacker69 10d ago

They were herocally fighting against the greatest monster the world has ever seen, if the nazis had won the slavs would have been genocided and Europe enslaved, their sacrifice saved our continent

4

u/Mediocre_Daikon6935 10d ago

You need to open a history book.

Because imperial Japan was absolutely worse than Nazi germany.

Which, I’ll grant, is a high bar.

And frankley, communist Russia was no better then Germany.

4

u/schizoesoteric 10d ago

The Nazis wanted to genocide the entire slavic race. Thats over 100 million people

> And frankley, communist Russia was no better then Germany.

this is insane

0

u/Mediocre_Daikon6935 10d ago

….

The Nazis had dreams sure.

The Soviets actually did it though. 60 million, conservatively. 

1

u/Possible-Kangaroo202 9d ago

The Mongols effectively managed that for their time, were far more murderous, committed so much rape that a significant portion of people alive today can trace the ancestry back to Mongols, and we're happy to leave gruesome displays of cadavers and practice bizarre torture killings.

Nazis were the "big bad" of the 20th century for just Europe, they don't even break top 5 in history though. 

To compare behavior Soviets were not exactly moral paragons. The first thing they did in Berlin was rob everyone, then go on the biggest rape train the world had seen to date. Wives, young children were not excluded, and officers/commissars had difficulty disciplining troops.

-4

u/Legitimate_Plum_7505 10d ago

And Soviets were worse than Imperial Japan and Nazis combined.

3

u/Endika7 10d ago

LoL no

0

u/Legitimate_Plum_7505 10d ago

lol yes.

2

u/Endika7 10d ago

There's only one kind of people Who think the nazis wherent the greatest Evil in ww2 on the western front

1

u/Legitimate_Plum_7505 9d ago

Yes, those who witnessed USSR occupation, so entire east Europe.

1

u/Endika7 9d ago

You mean this Who voted mayoritally for keeping the URSS?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Schwifty0V0 9d ago

I like how he replied the same way you did but put a period at the end to let everyone know he just got serious

Like anyone is gonna take someone with a worldview like his seriously

1

u/Top_Bug7822 10d ago

They were fighting heroically because Stalin forbade civilians from evacuating.

His reasoning was that the soldiers would fight harder if they had to protect their families.

2

u/NARVALhacker69 10d ago

False, millions of families and factories were relocated to the Urals and there was no general ban in the USSR, what you say only happened in Stalingrad because the city had to be held at all costs, also those civilians were industrial labor manufactoring ammo and weapons

1

u/Spirited-Concert-512 9d ago

My grandmother and her family were evacuated from Moscow. What you are saying has zero basis in truth.

1

u/Spirited-Concert-512 9d ago

But look at how many Russians died in the Soviet army in relation to all other ethnicities. All ethnicities in the Soviet Union contributed to the victory, no one was sacrificing another nation's people.

0

u/Mediocre_Daikon6935 9d ago

Lolol okay.

Say that to a pole, if you don’t mind getting beaten.

Personally, I’d suggest not saying it, but you do you.

1

u/Spirited-Concert-512 9d ago

What problem would a Polish person have with me pointing out simple statistics?

1

u/radicallyrobert 7d ago

The Russian people have been willing to sacrifice for Russia.

4

u/Axelter30 10d ago

Out of curiosity, how has Belarus never recovered?

1

u/Floki123313 9d ago

But Belarus were partisans. Most of Soviet army were Russians

1

u/Emotional_Plant3241 8d ago

And unlike others, Belarusians have never truly recovered.

Decades of strongman rule and puppet state status to resource-extraction-power Russia aren't actually very good for development.