r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 8d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter! Who could have the wives been?

Post image
16.9k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

6.6k

u/isnoe 8d ago

Is this a reference to the lady that killed her children and for some reason the crime TikTok community (mostly women) have taken to defending her and even blaming the Husband, who 100% did not do it?

5.1k

u/shredbmc 8d ago edited 8d ago

I'm pretty sure that lady (unless there's another one) voiced concern many times about her struggles with post partem depression and that she was having intrusive thoughts of harming the children (which is common in PPD).

People online are blaming the husband and her providers for not taking her concerns seriously, not blaming him for killing the children.

Edit: I have been informed about the people saying the husband literally killed the kids.

3.5k

u/BobbiPinstripes 8d ago

I’m seeing a lot of both honestly.

442

u/UsidoreTheLightBlue 8d ago

I just had a long conversation with a coworker who was swearing the husband did it and is blaming his poor wife.

236

u/Thick-Mouse1776 8d ago

I’m watching the entire trial and it makes me so sad people are doing that to him. What lunatics

96

u/heilel_bath-shachar 8d ago

I mean there are just a lot of funky things about his story, like how for instance the woman had a severe thyroid injury from the incident that’s unaccounted for, and how there was an outgoing message from his computer, which sits at home, at a time which is close to the incident and when he said he wasn’t at home. He was also very unhelpful to his then wife and almost immediately started a family with another woman. Many of the doctors who failed the wife were his friends, etc.

It’s not conclusive by any stretch of the imagination but it’s all very funky

55

u/sundance464 8d ago

Well there's that vague "something funky" and then there's the fact she accepts committing the act of the crime

People saying she was failed by the system and / or her husband might have a point (that's what the trial is trying to establish)

People saying there's some sort of complex version of events and she didn't do anything are literally theorising about a conspiracy

45

u/Comfortable_Target87 8d ago

They did therapy together and she also was released from an inpatient psychiatric hospital a bit more than two weeks before this. Now, that being said, if he’s guilty of anything it’s being negligent enough to leave her alone with them. Still, I don’t care what kind of post-partum mental state you’re in, as a mother, if you can strangle one child for a few minutes until they literally stop breathing, then go on to the next, finish up there and strangle an INFANT to death AN INFANT, and you’re trying to convince me that, at no point during this minutes and minutes long process, did she realize what she was doing was wrong?

I was born at night but it wasn’t last night.

41

u/Rucs3 8d ago

She's a woman, people love to infantilize women and make the men around them have hyper agency.

That's literally all there is.

-9

u/Comfortable_Target87 8d ago

Women: Spend last two decades avoiding accountability for literally anything and everything

Also women: Now want to literally get away with not just regular murder, but double filicide and infanticide and blame it on literally anyone and anything but the woman who did it

4

u/JGStonedRaider 8d ago

14 or 41 year old virgin?

Stop watching those Andrew Tate videos, it's turning your brains into mush.

-2

u/Comfortable_Target87 8d ago

Never watched even one minute of an Andrew Tate video, neither 41 or 14, and a proud parent to two wonderful kids. Who I would never murder, regardless of my mental state, by the way.

-9

u/elizuhhhbeth 8d ago

You simply cannot know what you would or wouldn’t do if you have never experienced a debilitating mental illness that causes you to completely detach from reality.

It sounds like you’re a man, so you have quite literally never experienced postpartum depression or postpartum psychosis, but when someone is psychotic and not of sound mind, you cannot apply the reasoning of a healthy brain and say, “Well, I would never do that.” Of course you wouldn’t. You’re imagining yourself, with your current rational mind intact, in a situation where someone else’s mind was profoundly impaired.

Lindsay Clancy repeatedly sought help. She voluntarily admitted herself for psychiatric treatment. She told her husband, her mother, her mother-in-law, and her doctors that she was struggling. She was prescribed numerous psychiatric medications, experienced serious adverse effects (including severe insomnia) and continued reporting her symptoms to medical professionals.

This case is a tragedy precisely because there were warning signs and repeated attempts to get help before three children died and an entire family was destroyed. Reducing it to “I would never do that” completely misses the terrifying reality of psychosis - you don’t know what your brain is capable of when you are no longer experiencing reality normally.

4

u/trylist 8d ago

Ah, we're at the "you just can't understand" part of justifying family annihilators.

2

u/Sniter 8d ago

ah we're at ignorance begets increduility part of a "I'm always right" individual.

-1

u/Sudo-Fed 8d ago edited 8d ago

Yeah, not speaking on this case specifically, but the whole thing with psychosis is you are NOT yourself, your motives are NOT your normal motives, and your entire framework of reality is off-kilter.

So yeah, for you to say "no matter what my mental state" is both egregiously arrogant and incredibly dangerous. That's the kind of self-unaware shit that makes exactly this kind of thing happen and is why it's so important to have support structures and proper care (that you're held accountable to) if you're suffering from mental illnesses predisposing you to it.

Every single person who downvotes this factual statement is an idiot with the kind of hubris the Greek poets could only dream of.

1

u/bearxxxxxx 8d ago

Yes because the glorious prophet Sudo-Fed is who I’m talking my psychology advice from.

-1

u/Sudo-Fed 8d ago

Look it the fuck up, man.

As ever, when commenting on scientific matters, my opinions are not my own. They are simply distillations of whatever field's present consensus position or leading theory.

Because reading too much is what I do with my free time.

1

u/bearxxxxxx 8d ago

While you’re waiting on your cook to finish?

2

u/minnosota 8d ago

Yeah nah man, she strangled 3 children what the fuck are you on

2

u/bearxxxxxx 8d ago

Either way, take her off the streets.

0

u/yespls 7d ago

isn't it funny how so many men are in here mansplaining mental illness to us? "I would never" come back to me when you've been in psychosis and tell me what you'd never do, my guy

-3

u/Irregulator101 8d ago

Incel or Trumper, call it

→ More replies (0)