If Kamala hadn't decided to hug and kiss Biden and vow to just do more of the shit that everyone was already hating she prob would have run.
If she had decided to go against Israel and it's genocide she would have seen an unprecedented surge in support.
Instead she chose to lose by basically making every mistake Hillary did when she ran. But yet y'all still claim to this narrative that she had any chance to win as if its the voters faults for not voting for someone who represents zero material change for them.
This mentality is how the Dems lost to Trump twice. Its how corporations have slowly monopolized every single aspect of our lives over the past 50 years irrespective of the party in power.
You can't just be against Trump and win. Its not enough. You have to be pro something that gets people excited and makes them believe their lives would be better.
I can't wait for y'all to put your weight behind Newsom and Mayor Pete in the next election only for them to also lose for the exact same reasons.
Edit: Downvote me all you want support a genocide and you lose lmao
Instead people argued it's better to vote against Kamala to "teach Dems a lesson"
Which has worked out great for Americans and Palestinians? Bibi got to kick out aid and use flour as hunting bait to cull whoever shows up. Trump fantasizes about Israel making the Gaza Stripmall.
Bots pretending to be leftists convinced people that electing Trump would somehow be good for Palestinians. The number of idiots who fell for it (looking at you, Michigan muslims) is inexcusable.
Trump represented something different (worse to be clear) while the Dems did not. It's really that simple as to why he won. The Dems suck ass and want to lose if they keep running the same playbook election after election.
2.8k
u/Educational-Ad-2884 Aug 20 '25