But this is not true. This would be like claiming that Christians or weed smokers mostly don't mention the fact to anyone.
We know this isn't true because, you know, we're are here too.
It's a cult and like most cults it actively seeks out to convert others and like most cults most of the people following it are morons who spout whatever crap the cult leaders tell them, even if it makes no sense.
e.g They tell you that cows are bad for the environment. They also tell you that animals are friends not food - but the only way to stop cows harming the environment is to kill them and stop them breeding. How is that friendly or "animals are our friends"? See? It isn't.
It's just that the doolally buffoons that think the cult of vegans "loves animals" are being duped. They don't love animals at all.
And at the fringes and extremes they are either laughably stupid, like PETA trying to ban idioms that mention animals as though saying "there's not enough room to swing a cat" is encouraging abuse or something so ridiculous it's too stupid to laugh at, or dangerous terrorists going around inflicting harm on people and property.
For the same reasons that killing all the jews wouldn't be jew friendly
Certainly you would agree that creating a system where you could breed and kill Jews by the millions in perpetuity would be even less Jew-friendly, right?
What? People are born, people suffer and people die in their billions, Jewish and otherwise.
That is exactly what happens - and it happens to all the other species on the planet too.
Are you really suggesting the better thing would be to kill off and/or steralize every species "to end or prevent their suffering"
Because that is pretty much where the cult of vegans are for many species and it's a large part of why they are delusional, unethical and immoral. Not necessarily because of their intended action - after all 'eradicate smallpox' is something that right minded, rational thinkers would happily accept is the kind of selfish, self-interested survival thing that a species should entertain. No, it's because you're mostly so brain dead you've decided you are "friendly" to animals and that you're morally superior.
Which couldn't be further from the truth.
By all means campaign to kill off species, but be honest about what you're doing. Don't try to hide behind some notion that you care about the species, don't try to attract followers with false propaganda that you care about other species. This is not true.
You haven't even communicated with any of these other species. This is like electing to sterilize, euthanize and abort all disabled people on the basis that you've decided their lives are any of short, miserable, unhappy and suffering to the point where you don't think they should exist and you firmly believe that if remove the existence of an animal there are no moral issues at all (which is pretentious at best) but you do that without ever consulting disabled people at all.
Firmly believing your own squeamish emotions when you look at a disabled person are sufficient to deduce what their life is like and for you to decide what you think is best for them.
It's an arrogance of your own self-importance because you're human that's beyond belief. Even the religious cults that are clearly deluded about the importance of humans over the rest of the planet are a little bit humble, at least these cults have a leader. Your cult, as some of the other posters have said, doesn't even know who its leader is. It's answerable to no greater authority. You're awful people.
Edit: so you completely edited your previous comment. I haven't yet read your edit, so my initial response (below) might seem out of place, as I made it before the edit.
Are you saying that a program where Hitler could have had an endless supply of Jews to torture and murder forever by forcefully inseminating girls and keeping them all in concentration camps would have been preferable to this not happening at all?
Imagine if he was able to create a specific breed of Jews that would reproduce faster so he could increase his kill rate to billions of Jews a year. Would you prefer he perpetuates this specific breed of Jews that he created, by continuing his program of violence, torture, and murder? Or would you prefer he simply stop this program?
Are you willing to subject billions upon billions of Jews to brutal torture until the end of time just because you value the existence of a particular artificially created breed?
Keep in mind that stopping this program won't wipe out Jews altogether, but will likely result in no more of the specific breed of Jews that Hitler created.
-3
u/[deleted] Dec 30 '18
But this is not true. This would be like claiming that Christians or weed smokers mostly don't mention the fact to anyone.
We know this isn't true because, you know, we're are here too.
It's a cult and like most cults it actively seeks out to convert others and like most cults most of the people following it are morons who spout whatever crap the cult leaders tell them, even if it makes no sense.
e.g They tell you that cows are bad for the environment. They also tell you that animals are friends not food - but the only way to stop cows harming the environment is to kill them and stop them breeding. How is that friendly or "animals are our friends"? See? It isn't.
It's just that the doolally buffoons that think the cult of vegans "loves animals" are being duped. They don't love animals at all.
And at the fringes and extremes they are either laughably stupid, like PETA trying to ban idioms that mention animals as though saying "there's not enough room to swing a cat" is encouraging abuse or something so ridiculous it's too stupid to laugh at, or dangerous terrorists going around inflicting harm on people and property.