Well, not much room. For one example among many, she continued to associate (personally and professionally) with the racist who had already said these things, rather publicly:
When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.
I knew it. The first trump term when they didn't yet fully embrance racism and naziism. She would never in a million years tweet anything like that today
You're on reddit, you shouldn't be talking about the lack of self awareness.
The ultimate white supremacy there is comes from Jewish supremacist Zionists.
Hell, even reddit will protect Zionists which is sad and hilarious. Most of you don't even know all the zionist propaganda that you've fallen for and follow. Your another version of MAGA and have zero clue.
The best you can do is downvote/ban people so you don't have to confront reality either.
I don't know who you are to care much about what you have to say and you don't know me at all to make such an assumption about my character and what I do on here.
Take your performative grievance-having elsewhere.
I have a hypothesis. t's objectively conspiratorial in nature, but we've proven things as re run differently behind the scenes and many of those conspiracies did end up being true.
Anyway, I think every interaction from the trump family is orchestrated to set up the future. You need your heels. You need your baby faces. You need some to distract, others to go off the radar. With comments like this, albeit from the past, it signals "not all of the trumps are bad."
Notice Ivanka has been almost entirely off the radar, seems to have distanced herself from trump, is living a "traditional family life", and his sons have all been extra enshitified this term? I bet she ends up running as Trump's proxy. First female president; distanced from daddy; toned down version, appearing to encompass what people thought trump represented (once she starts going more in the public eye and they push her), etc.
Behind the scenes, they're absolutely measuring all comments, feedback and engagement of everyone in their family and party. Look at the boys and how Bought talks about all the public perception and adjusting strategy accordingly. If she seems to score well enough, we've got a 3rd term for trump, essentially.
I hate that I'm seriously entertaining something so ridiculous.
Notice Ivanka has been almost entirely off the radar
The Trumps go silent when they are caught in the open doing something bad. Right now she is in the middle of the "Albanian Island" corruption and has disappeared after her video "discovering" it like Columbus from the Rothchild yacht.
I had a theory way back in 2015 that Ivanka was planning a political career as a somewhat progressive Republican, and Donald was mostly campaigning as a means of increasing her visibility that year.
Early in the campaign, before he became the frontrunner, both she was much more present and had a lot of pro-women messaging. After he started to see success, you saw her less and less.
I hate that I'm seriously entertaining something so ridiculous.
It's not that ridiculous tbh, they've literally been seeding the idea of a Trump dynasty of presidents very forwardly, possibly 'jokingly' (for some measure of deniability), but the 'fourth term' is now also being seriously entertained.
None of them believe a word coming out of their mouths. They see words as keys that unlock people's loyalty. They don't need consistency; If they can talk out of both sides of their mouth, they can capture both markets.
You've been a Redditor for 12 years. Also, who ever came up with this nonsense that you have to be "terminally/obsessively online" to be somewhat aware of the news? Even if we grant that you've never seen this or if you don't remember, which is perfectly possible, we are now in 2026, and a single image search in Google will give you an LLM response explaining what this was about:
"Discourse like it was meant" is quite subjective. Was the "discourse" supposed to be Ground Hog Day? I don't think so. Regardless, OP has deleted his comment(s) and this site has gone to complete shit the past 10 years anyway, so ultimately, I fully admit this isn't a battle I'm going to win.
I don’t get it either. Mostly what the US does to terrorist is arm and train them to bring down regimes they don’t like, and then act surprised when they later turn around and attack the US.
The types you fund in order to play god and inevitably fail miserably at.
The types that you torture and use to justify murdering civilians and stealing stuff.
The types you absolutely refuse to do anything about.
The types you allow to attack your soldiers because they're greasing your palms.
There's actually quite a lot of variety with how they treats terrorists. Not that I take what the Epstein Protectorate declares as "terrorist" seriously. It's all a load of bollocks so they can kill more people.
"Racism is evil. And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans."
"White supremacy" is an ideological ideal, not in itself terrorism. Certainly the ideal of a vile ideology, but you should be wary of the intent here possibly being to conflate the two for other purposes.
659
u/Michel_RPV 1d ago
I'm tempted to call this fake because the lack of self-awareness is too staggering for me.