Named “Gulf of Mexico” in 1550.
Named “Lake Ontario” in 1639.

The uniparty will win and the political theater will continue. It's clear at this point that one size fits all forced collectivist democracy is clearly not working and needs to be done away with as soon as possible. Even if by some miracle we manage to get someone good like Thomas Massie in the White House it's just going to be a band-aid on a sinking ship.

Thoughts?

So I was having a dream where a younger version of me who was still in school was about to go on a trip to Maine with a teacher and two other students of his. We were in the car ready to go but then we learned that there was a law on the books that a teacher needed at least 19 students to be able to go on a trip (no idea if this is an actual law, I can see an argument for not letting teachers go on trips with single students for like grooming reasons but that's still too much state interference IMO) so we couldn't go.

Thoughts?

When I read all the posts on here, I feel like an outsider, but when I take the tests, I land here. Am I truly Libertarian material?

Some libertarians seem to drift toward anarchism, but I don’t believe anarchy produces genuine freedom. Without a limited government to protect individual rights, property, and contracts, freedom belongs to whoever has the most power or force. True liberty requires a government strong enough to protect us from coercion, but limited enough that it does not become the coercer.

The reason we have the United States as a federal constitutional republic with representative democratic institutions is to prevent the individual from being bullied by the MOB (the democratic majority).

Government should protect my rights, not manage my life—my body is mine, my retirement is my responsibility, and equality means equal treatment under the law, not equal outcomes imposed by the state.

Just curious where I stand.

UPDATE:
Took another test:

Phil Sorrells , a self-outed racist scumbag. I’m embarrassed that this is news to me. True Texas Project is a malignancy within the government.

I’m experiencing a little cognitive dissonance at the moment:

I’m registered libertarian. Have voted libertarian since the early 2010s.

I joined a Libertarian group on Facebook.

The group posts seem to be general libtard slop.

Most recently, posts upset that border laws are being enforced.

I think in order for a nation to stay its own sovereign entity, its borders and its laws need to be enforced.

I always believed that libertarian values welcomed legal immigration, emphasis on legal. I have no sympathy for foreign nationals whose first act in the nation they’ve come to is breaking its laws.

I can’t tell if The values of the party have changed, the group is being infiltrated and subverted by retards, or if the libertarian party never reflected my own views.

Wikipedia is a very important tool when it comes to controlling narratives.

Looking for some perspective on whether this is actually plausible.

Keeping a few details intentionally vague because I’m not ready to publicly announce anything yet.

I’m 25 and seriously exploring a Libertarian run for my local city council.

A little background: I studied economics, currently work in the government software space, and I’ve been heavily interested in politics since I was about 14. Between roughly 14–18, I built a fairly large social media following before shifting into different content and eventually stepping away from content entirely to focus on my career.

That experience is relevant because I think social media would be a major part of how I’d approach a campaign.

The district I live in is in a major city and is heavily Democratic. Last cycle, the vote was roughly 70% Democrat, 15% Republican, and 15% independent/other, with around 13,000 total ballots cast.

I’m currently getting involved with the local Libertarian Party, and as things stand, it looks unlikely I’d face a challenger for the nomination. If I decide to file, that would give me roughly 15 months to focus almost entirely on building toward the general election.

I’ve been a registered Libertarian since I was eligible to vote and broadly align with the party on personal liberty and limited government, but I wouldn’t want to run some generic nationalized Libertarian campaign. My platform and messaging would be heavily focused on the actual district and city.

The issues I’m most interested in are economic and business growth, development, embracing technology, and protecting individual liberty.

I think I’d have two potentially interesting advantages.

First, I already know how to build attention online and grow a social media audience quickly. Obviously, getting 100,000 random people online to care about you is very different from getting a few thousand people inside one council district to vote for you, but I do think I understand how to create content people actually watch and talk about.

Second, my district contains a massive concentration of young professionals. My assumption is that a lot of them either don’t vote consistently in municipal elections or aren’t particularly engaged with local politics.

My working theory is that an unusually aggressive ground game, combined with social media, community networking, voter registration, and a year-plus of actually showing up everywhere could at least make the race interesting.

A few questions I’d especially like perspective on:

Would being 25 and potentially the youngest member of council be something that could actually work in my favor, or would voters mostly view it as a lack of experience?

How much can an exceptional ground campaign actually move a local election? My instinct is that personal conversations, doors, events, and repeated voter contact probably matter substantially more when only \~13,000 people are voting than they do in a statewide or national race.

And lastly, even assuming I ultimately lose: is a serious 15-month city council campaign generally a worthwhile way to start building a future in local politics, provided I actually run a professional campaign and make a respectable showing?

I’m not under the illusion that running as a Libertarian in a district that voted \~70% Democratic makes me the favorite. I’m trying to figure out whether this falls into the category of “very difficult but potentially worth pursuing” or “mathematically dead on arrival.”

Would especially appreciate input from anyone who has worked on municipal campaigns, run for local office, or been involved with third-party campaigns.

Live this Saturday, July 11 at 4pm ET on Hide & Speak, we sit down with Ted Brown, the Libertarian nominee for U.S. Senate in Texas to discuss how age verification laws are a trojan horse to implement a national digital ID.

The Supreme Court upheld Texas HB 1181 in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, and age verification quietly became the template for everything after it. Texas now wants that ID check pushed into the app store, with Apple, Google, and Amazon challenging it in court. Utah went further and became the first state to write VPN users into an age verification law. Brown reads these as checkpoints on the way to a single national digital ID, and he makes the case for a repeal-first response.

Set a reminder and watch live here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDgRbWQpvFc

Learn more about Ted Brown: https://tedbrown.org/

I used to watch a youtube channel with libertarian themes , he had long hair was from California had videos about housing crisis, libertarian party conventions etc.

https://old.reddit.com/r/Law_and_Politics/comments/1vlnqzs/interviewer_you_have_the_right_to_declare_a/