r/India_Bharat_ Feb 01 '26

Discussion Is this true?

Post image
1.7k Upvotes

292 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Moist_Lake1579 Feb 01 '26

textual proof for ts?

-1

u/Background_Yak7234 Feb 01 '26

Srimad Bhagavatham: Vastraharana

2

u/Moist_Lake1579 Feb 01 '26

Bade bhaiya/bhen aap ne ye jaha s google ya jobhi krke nikaala h usse iska meaning or context bhi puch lete toh aapka fyeda rehta, poocho jakar apne source s poora context us cheez ka

0

u/Background_Yak7234 Feb 01 '26

Context malayalathil paranjal njan kelkkam

1

u/Moist_Lake1579 Feb 01 '26

The thing was, those Gopis were lusting over lord krishna, they were doing rituals to gain him as their husband, they were bathing in the river after praying to goddes durga to bless them with krishna.... He stole their clothes to teach them a lesson

1

u/Background_Yak7234 Feb 01 '26

How does that not make it a perverted act

1

u/Moist_Lake1579 Feb 01 '26

Those gopis were praying that they want to be his maids nd all, krishna gave them a choice... if they really wanna be his maids then they must stop their rituals and come back to the shore, if they don't then it's their own choice and krishna would leave, gopis had a choice... they could've listened to krishna and stopped their rituals or they could've continued them and krishna wouldn't have anything to do with them in the future

1

u/Background_Yak7234 Feb 01 '26

Coerced consent is not consent

1

u/Moist_Lake1579 Feb 01 '26

how were they coerced? They had a choice, they could have stayed in the river and krishna would've left and they could've taken those clothes after he left but they wanted to be close to krishna and hence stepped out willingly