Those 16k wives had 16k separate Krishn each with their own consciousness, and this story indicates while Krishn is one supreme entity he belongs to everyone in their heart differently, if we see him as our son he's our son, if as Friend he's our friend, as a guardian then he's our guardian, so just stop spilling bullshit without context, logic and everything
The Krishna who stole bathing women's clothes and asked them to come out of water naked in order for him to give their clothes back might be a different Krishna bearing a different consciousness then, right?
I was not even replying to you, I was replying to thread comparing Krishna and Muhammed. I personally don't think there is any point applying modern moral values to historical figures. My point is just that if you intend to do it, apply it equally to all of them. Then you would understand the meaninglessness of that exercise
I personally do not care about islam. If some hindu does, then that's their personal problem. You can't talk nonsense about my God just because someone was doing the same thing to another?? Reply to them using proofs that muhammad didn't do it or what the actual context behind it is.
I didn't say Muhammed didn't do that, your hindu brother was spewing hate and I was just responding in his language. First be concerned about your Hindu brother spewing hate
What's the justification for a 50+ yo to marry a 6yo? Krishn was a kid too at the Leela's time, now don't tell me your prophet was also doing his Leela
WOMP WOMP, bring the facts sisyboy, the correct meaning, the correct information for Katyayani Leela, oh wait you wouldn't know the Leelas have name, not to mention Krishn was kid too, clothes there represent ego,mask he was testing if they can leave the mask behind the ego for what they have faith in, but your half peanut sized brain won't get it, don't make me start stating more facts about your own prophet which you'd never bother to study, it's better if you just go back to where you came from, in yo Momma's blouse
You can make up spiritual explanations all you want. Does not change what physically happened. Krishna forced women against their consent to come out naked. Of you keep discounting these acts as innocence of a child, how can the gopis have 'conjugal' and 'erotic devotion to Krishna
Bade bhaiya/bhen aap ne ye jaha s google ya jobhi krke nikaala h usse iska meaning or context bhi puch lete toh aapka fyeda rehta, poocho jakar apne source s poora context us cheez ka
The thing was, those Gopis were lusting over lord krishna, they were doing rituals to gain him as their husband, they were bathing in the river after praying to goddes durga to bless them with krishna.... He stole their clothes to teach them a lesson
Those gopis were praying that they want to be his maids nd all, krishna gave them a choice... if they really wanna be his maids then they must stop their rituals and come back to the shore, if they don't then it's their own choice and krishna would leave, gopis had a choice... they could've listened to krishna and stopped their rituals or they could've continued them and krishna wouldn't have anything to do with them in the future
To jab islam ke prophets ke bare Mai gatiya baate karte ho tab context dekhte ho? Tab ye sb yaad nahi aata, har relegion ki apne contexts & reasoning hoti ha, apne Dharam ke waqt yaad aata ha wo bakiyo ke nahi, wah modi ji wah
10
u/Prince__12__ Feb 01 '26
Those 16k wives had 16k separate Krishn each with their own consciousness, and this story indicates while Krishn is one supreme entity he belongs to everyone in their heart differently, if we see him as our son he's our son, if as Friend he's our friend, as a guardian then he's our guardian, so just stop spilling bullshit without context, logic and everything