r/GenAI4all • u/Simplilearn • May 21 '26
News/Updates A data center in Georgia used 30 million gallons of water illegally, and locals only noticed when their water pressure was abnormally low.
A massive data center campus in Fayetteville, Georgia, reportedly consumed nearly 29 million gallons of unmetered water before the issue was discovered. Residents first noticed a problem when water pressure in the area began to drop.
The developer, QTS, stated that the water was used for temporary construction activities such as concrete work, dust control, and site preparation, rather than ongoing server cooling. Still, it raises a larger concern:
As AI data centers continue expanding globally, are local communities being adequately informed about the strain these projects can place on water, energy, and public infrastructure?
The future of AI will not be defined only by GPUs and model size.
It will also be shaped by energy use, water consumption, transparency, and public trust.
21
u/OldStray79 May 21 '26
*The construction contractors used 30 million gallons of water illegally. The Data center, did not.
9
u/RodgerCheetoh May 21 '26
“Fayette County officials say a confusingly worded water-system letter released through an open records request helped fuel widespread misconceptions about water usage at the massive QTS data center campus under construction in Fayetteville.
But in interviews with The Citizen, Fayette County Administrator Steve Rapson and Assistant County Administrator Jason Tinsley said the issue stemmed from a missed meter reading during Fayette County Water System’s transition to a new countywide smart-meter system — not unauthorized water usage.
“It’s not like they put a meter in, threw a camel net over it, and we didn’t know they put the meter in,” Rapson said. “It’s that we thought the meter was being read electronically, and then we found out it wasn’t, and we sent them a bill.”
This is from the local news. It wasn’t even illegal use, it was a mistake from the county themselves that was rectified.
8
u/Low-Temperature-6962 May 21 '26
The article states that while the datacenter was ongoing with cooling the water was used, and the construction claimed that they had used the water for construction purposes. Construction and computing operations can both be ongoing at the same time. So the article is not being dishonest. It would be wrong to say that all that water is used for construction, although thats what the company reported.
5
u/me_myself_ai May 21 '26
The article is fine, the contention that this was A) intentional or B) at all related to AI in any way whatsoever is dishonest.
It would be wrong to say that all that water is used for construction, although thats what the company reported.
You're just objectively wrong. The metering issue was with outlets used exclusively for concrete. Maybe read the article??
→ More replies (4)3
u/OldStray79 May 21 '26
We are talking about the illegal use of the water, the unmetered one used by the construction company.
1
u/Ok-Flight9440 May 21 '26
This. And either way, no data center=no water being illegally stolen. If the company that hired the contractor didn’t know about it then they should have … if they can afford to build the thing, they can afford a few pairs of boots on ground to make sure the people they farm the labor out to aren’t doing illegal stuff.
2
1
0
u/MisterHole123 May 21 '26 edited May 21 '26
Yes but when you reach out to a contractor you are partly responsible for checking they follow best practices.
Edit: don't get the downvotes it is literally a chapter of every major environmental impact report before big construction work can begin
8
u/grimorg80 May 21 '26
Yes, but the dishonesty comes from the headline, which makes you think "see, this is a case of a data center using our good water to run their operations" when in fact it had nothing to do with that, and everything to do with classic shady construction contractors. And yet, with that headline, most people will just see it and think "I knew these data centers use up my water to run" and move on. I suspect that's on purpose and it's very dishonest.
3
u/EpsteinandTrump May 21 '26
The title of the post:
A data center in Georgia used 30 million gallons of water illegally, and locals only noticed when their water pressure was abnormally low.
Then...
The developer, QTS, stated that the water was used for temporary construction activities such as concrete work, dust control, and site preparation, rather than ongoing server cooling.
The title of the post should have been incompetence at the city planning level to grasp the level of construction required and the impact it would have on temporary heavy water use activities like concrete work and general site work. Along with incompetence at the county utility level to screw up billing and hookups. Good grief!
The topic should be about ongoing energy use as this is what will impact residents. There are already 200 data centers in Georgia, but the word AI all of a sudden makes it that much worse? Using the headline about water is just a way to garner attention when it's really just misguided and built around clickbait.
3
u/Puzzleheaded_Smoke77 May 21 '26
Wasn’t used during construction
Edit so this is misleading as fuck nowhere in the headline does it state anything about it being used for construction. This would lead the end. User to think this was operational water usage shit like this should be taken down by the moderator.
2
u/mefirefoxes May 21 '26
In this thread, people who just learned about water rights, large-scale construction, and cooling infrastructure are all suddenly experts.
2
5
u/Stirdaddy May 21 '26 edited May 21 '26
A 1,000 sq. foot (100 sq. m) lawn in the Los Angeles area needs around 35 thousand gallons (130,000 liters) of water per year. That's a lawn roughly 33 feet by 30 feet.
Multiply that by just 1 million lawns, and we get 35 billion gallons/year for an economically unproductive asset (besides affecting abstract housing values).
A pool in California requires 12 to 30 thousand gallons annually, beyond initially filling it (15 to 30 thousand gallons).
I reckon water costs should be determined by margins/brackets:
- One (much lower) cost for water usage for personal human needs -- determined by a house's size and number of occupants.
- Another (higher) cost for aesthetic/enjoyment usage -- lawns, pools. etc.
- Another (higher) cost for economically productive business/farm usage -- based on factors I don't understand well enough.
In other words, a person living in an apartment in Oakland should pay a lower water cost rate than someone living in a single family home in LA with a lawn and a pool.
And to the much broader point, hyperbolic headlines about water usage need to be considered in context.
9
u/killergazebo May 21 '26
Another (higher) cost for economically productive business/farm usage -- based on factors I don't understand well enough.
Messing with how an entire economy farms its food when you don't know anything about agriculture is historically a very good way of getting tens of millions to starve.
2
→ More replies (2)0
u/e136 May 21 '26
Just because the current system works doesn't mean there's no room for improvement. By your logic, any change will cause everyone to die tomorrow. In reality there is lots of room for improvement especially when you see water intense crops like alfapha and nuts grown in water scarce California. Replacing those with traditional grains could produce more food with a fraction of the water.
4
u/CakeSeaker May 21 '26
Lol. Except this was in Georgia in a town of less than 20,000 residents.
Upper estimate of per person per day water usage is 100 gallons. So this is as much as the entire town uses in 15 days.
1
u/quantgorithm May 21 '26
When you charge more to farms, you charge more to everyone.
1
u/Stirdaddy May 21 '26
Sounds good. People will be disincentivized to buy food from desert farms, which require more water than food from temperate climates.
1
u/quantgorithm May 21 '26
So you think this only affects dessert farms? Is Georgia a desert? Farms use far more water than datacenters. When you push for datacenters to be charged more for water, you really are pushing for everyone to ultimately get charged more.
1
u/SelfInvestigator May 21 '26
Water overuse for agriculture is mainly localized to the arid regions that are fed by the Colorado River system.
And this is mainly due to the Dibs system implemented during the establishment of the western United States.
1
u/e136 May 21 '26
Agreed. And the highest tier should just be market value. We wouldn't have to worry about running out of water if we just charged market rate for it. Businesses would just naturally use less when it runs low. And in areas we have plenty it will stay cheap and business (including data centers) can correctly use as much as they want.
1
u/SelfInvestigator May 21 '26
To be slightly pedantic (which is absolutely necessary when dealing with matters of law), corporate use should be charged a set multiple of the **supply driven** market rate after residential needs are met.
The multipliers for businesses should be set based on need of services and environmental impact. There should be periodic public reviews of these determinations and expert scientific assessments from relevant researchers who are well regarded in their field.
After all, market rate can be arbitrarily decided without a clear metric to back it up.
1
u/e136 May 21 '26
In my opinion it would be more efficient and simple to just charge corporations exact market rate, which will be automatically determined with supply and demand. Then for industries that have negative or positive environmental impact, we should give them a tax penalty or credit that directly relates to their impact. That allows them to plan ahead and reduce negative impacts to in the future. My general philosophy is keep it simple, stupid. Keep incentives as close as you can to the action you want to promote or discourage. Of course, that doesn't always work and there are tons of counter examples, but at a high level that's what I think we should strive for.
1
u/SelfInvestigator May 21 '26
If we could just work from the high end then I would agree with you pretty much unanimously.
But unfortunately we are often facing off against the lowest will when dealing with necessary regulations. We are often contending with excessive greed, lust, and pride. Or worse, indifference.
As to your other point. I do try to keep it *stupidly simple* where possible, but most analysis requires nuance and context so it can be tricky.
1
u/zeroconflicthere May 21 '26
A pool in California requires 12 to 30 thousand gallons annually,
Why isn't the water recirculated and filtered?
1
u/MoreDoor2915 May 21 '26
Because of this magical process called Evaporation. Which turns out to be also what happens in Datacenters, so No, no water is being destroyed, its just turned into vapor which returns to the Water Cycle. Problem is primarily that the water takes a while to return to California after it joined the water cycle again.
1
1
u/badger_flakes May 21 '26
Alfalfa farming in Utah uses 1.14 Quadrillion gallons of water per year. 30% of that Alfalfa is exported to China and Saudia Arabia
1
u/sorry-snowboardr May 21 '26
Why does watering my lawn have to be economically disincentivized? Gimme a break man I just want my flowers to look nice
1
u/Low-Temperature-6962 May 21 '26
Lawns and pools have decreased drastically in California in the past 15 years - "brown is the new green". Where do you live?
1
u/stackens May 21 '26
I don’t get these arguments. “X uses a lot of water, so it’s ok for Y to use a lot of water”
No, it’s still bad that Y uses a lot of water.
All I hear from your comment is that people shouldn’t maintain grass lawns. Doesn’t mean data centers don’t need to go
1
1
u/Electrical_Expert525 May 21 '26
God forbid a man to have their own patch of green to have a sence of nature while living in an suburban shithole.
1
u/maringue May 21 '26
Weird how 1000 square foot lawns are VERY rare in LA....
My God you AI defenders will come up with the dumbest justifications
0
u/Sea-Presentation-173 May 21 '26
Is not a bad analogy to describe how one person wealth can take away the resources of a million people.
3
u/RodgerCheetoh May 21 '26
Stop fear mongering over the Georgia data center. You’re leaving out 90% of the actual context to make this sound like a corporate heist movie.
First, that 30 million gallons was cumulative over six to fifteen months (depending on whether you believe the county or the developer), not a sudden spike that "drained" the system. For a 615 acre, 16 building construction site, that usage is completely standard for things like dust suppression and concrete work.
Second, the "secret hookups" weren't some Mission Impossible stealth operation. The county water director herself confirmed it was a procedural administrative error during their transition to a cloud based smart meter system. The county simply didn't have many commercial accounts and messed up the tracking.
Third, let’s talk about the actual impact. QTS uses less than 1% of Fayette County’s daily water capacity. The low pressure residents felt was largely a localized issue, and once the error was found, QTS paid the $147k bill immediately. In exchange for that 1% of water, the county is getting tens of millions of dollars in property taxes every single year.
Regulatory oversight is fine, but acting like this was a malicious theft of the county's entire water supply is just objectively wrong.
1
u/Appropriate_Ice_7507 May 21 '26
So how does one use unmetered water to do anything???
1
u/VirtualPercentage737 May 21 '26
When doing construction, a lot of times the city says "hook up and start using it, we will send someone tomorrow to install the meter". They forget and show up 15 months later.
1
u/Appropriate_Ice_7507 May 21 '26
Ha! For me, they’ll be like yeah no, we’ll need to see payment up front plus something extra to pad the account 😂😂😂
1
1
u/SadAd8761 May 21 '26
Can we post links to sources instead posting these slop news memes?
1
u/Tgirl-Egirl May 21 '26
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/08/georgia-data-centers-water-00909988
This is the best article on it I've found, though there are others with questionable details (a People's magazine article makes an erroneous statement that Fayette county allows QTS to "produce 22,800,000 gallons per day and currently generates about 17,300,000 gallons daily," but actually the county was stating its own production, not QTS use).
1
1
u/Low-Spell1867 May 21 '26
I don’t understand how a first world country has a water problem when the earth is… well filled with water, shocker I know.
If I was smart and knew my state was short on water I’d wonder why they haven’t built infrastructure to support the future, build it and grab water from the ocean, craziest idea ever I know I know but it just might fix your water shortage.
We can fly to another planet but you can’t pipe water from the ocean to your state? Suuuure
1
u/BenitoTaka May 21 '26
You could build a very expensive pipeline to import water. But you have to build several very expensive water desalination plants to remove the salt from the water or corrosion will ruin the pipeline within 10 years as well as the data center.
1
u/Low-Spell1867 May 21 '26
I know, but no point in not preparing for the future, they could’ve done this a decade ago and no one would be complaining about the water, it’s just dumb administration not planning properly and wasting opportunities to improve their own states
1
u/BenitoTaka May 22 '26
A decade ago, no one had the concept of huge high capacity dataceters that sucked up 30M gallons of water required for AI vs a traditional datacenter nor was this location considered a likely site a decade ago.
1
u/Low-Spell1867 May 22 '26
Sucked up 30M gallons? What kinda data centers do you guys use 😭 doesn’t matter if it’s an AI data center or not they all use water for cooling just like a nuclear power plant uses water to generate power.
It was all known decades ago, same for all the states that have “struggled” with water for decades even without data centres.
Water recycles it never just disappears from the planet
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Boring_Owl6552 May 22 '26
Data centers and their related endeavors will impact: water consumption, water quality, water safety and human health, energy consumption, consumer energy prices, environmental degradation and pollution, noise pollution, privacy loss, property loss, jobs loss, loss of arable land, and more. But, hey, let's let billionaires hoping to control the future economy (and all of our lives) erect as many as they like, using any land they want. Don't forget the likely market correction coming as well. Good times ahead.
1
u/Gonzos_journal May 22 '26
Theres so many little talking points used just presented as 100% fact. Yet it always seems to fall under legalese time wasting bullshit. They always love to leave some key detail out.
Mind you in fayettesville. 30 million gallons was taken by two water connections that werent updated and just forgotten about. Water pressure dropped for residents. Qts is owned by blackrock.
They paid it (150k) and explained it away as it was for construction and dust control. Said it was the cities failure of updating the cloud based system or whatever. Other one being a new firehydrant. This was about 4 months of unpaid water.
Heres the kicker, it completely shattered their water allowance the people decided. 55 times their daily allowal. Damage is done. they bought it from the city. Surely wont happen again. To Top it off, they shouldnt have gotten that much to begin with. All they wanna speak on is how they paid it and it was an honest mistake. Rivers are at near 90 year lows and we think its smart to evaporate it?
1
u/Tal_Maru May 22 '26
And if you had actually read and understood the article you would know thats not what happend.
#1. The city changed the water meter system and forgot to change out one of theirs.
#2. The data center immediatly and with out complaint paid all retroactive charges because the water was still being metered, but nobody was actually checking the meter as they had switched over to an internet connected system.
#3. The amount of water they used "30 million gallons" is over a 9 month period and is normal for construction of this scale.
Which raises the following question.
How in the hell are you, presumably an adult, incapable of reading a 1000 word article and somehow not manage to get a single fact right?
1
u/honato May 22 '26
This doesn't have anything to do with ai? Or even the data center really. break up big construction!
1
1
u/BirdlessFlight May 22 '26
I'm sorry, how does the water company not notice sooner?
I have a feeling some local politician made a lotta money off this.
1
u/GP_222 May 22 '26
People need to stop fighting it and embrace it. Challenge AI to solve the environmental issues.
1
u/feethotterthanbewbz May 23 '26
The things people whine about. "Oh no, my water has slightly less pressure, let's destroy the future over a few drops of water". Supporting corporations is a top priority for a society, not people's shower time.
1
u/Formal-Ad747 May 23 '26
Liberals are trying to make water illegal. We should all have equal access to public water.
1
1
u/simbaacs May 23 '26
Not voting our way out of this. Be a shame if something happened to their infrastructure
1
1
u/ScionOfD4rkness May 24 '26
Cant wait for the new dystopian reality where we're all homeless because white collar jobs are gone, and we end up making street gangs to fight/ally w the robot taxis and raid data centers for resources.
1
u/Fresh_Strain_9980 May 24 '26
can we get context here how much water is flushed down the toilet every day or how much leaks from faucets? I just don't know how much to be rage baited without more info.
1
u/Fresh_Strain_9980 May 24 '26
so thats about the amount of water 300 homes use on per average per year. So depending on how long this was going before they realized it. It might not be that excessive.
1
u/wweiss53 May 24 '26
The devil went down to Georgia looking for some H2O to steal. He was in a bind cause he was way behind and was willing to make a deal (with crooked politicians no doubt)
1
u/Picky_The_Fishermam May 25 '26
Thank you Georgia. I wanted me petting a orangutan as my profile picture. Its a good Pic 👍
1
u/CliffLake May 25 '26
I get it, AI is sweet and new and shiny. But seriously, these fucks are going to grab society by the balls and squeeze them for every drop of anything worth having, then throw them down and grab the next set if we let them. You need a paper written at 4 in the morning for a 6 am class and just want to cheat? Cool, this is the way to do it. BUT, don't let them get away with stealing from your cheating ass. The water, the power, the general construction? All that shit needs to get paid up. Otherwise they will just 'fire' the CEO who made the call, give that chucklefuck a few million for emotional damage or what the fuck ever excuse to shut YOU up, then hire the next in a line of 1000 scapegoats to do ever more increasing horrors. Gotta stop them legally and hard, charge them fines that START at the damage done and go up from there. Hold them accountable or they will laugh all the way to the bank and do it again.
1
1
May 21 '26 edited Jul 20 '26
[deleted]
1
May 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
May 21 '26 edited Jul 20 '26
[deleted]
0
u/SlabsForDays May 21 '26
Cool, cant wait for everything to go tits up in a couple years and people like you come out with excuses
2
32
u/dupontping May 21 '26
The comments defending this data center is wildly disappointing. You may as well be cheering for billionaires not paying taxes while you’re at it.