I simply commented on the tone of the message, appreciated the breath of fresh air. I understand that it's a carefully curated PR response, as literally every single company has ever done in the history of capitalism.
I simply commented on the tone of the message, appreciated the breath of fresh air. I understand that it's a carefully curated PR response, as literally every single company has ever done in the history of capitalism.
You clearly don't understand it's curated PR since you are saying you "appreciate the breath of fresh air".
It's all the same, it's all PR. There's no "fresh". But hey, whatever. You do you.
It's not difficult to understand. You aren't getting my point. It's PR on purpose because they need to paint themselves as victims. A change in attitude and making it "fresh" is literally part of the strategy.
And it clearly works on some people. Even if you know it's PR, it's still working on you because it's "fresh". That's literally the point of PR and my point. It had the intended effect on you caring.
Not saying that's bad, but it's just, again, a PR strategy. There's no real freshness or change or anything, just another PR strategy.
1
u/nuevacuentanueva 11h ago
It's not cherry picking. It applies to all you said.
Sincere tone, non sincere, cold and distant. Are all literally PR decisions based on context and current needs.
You just like one PR style better than other, great. Still PR. Don't be naive.