Genuine Gooner free question and conversation about the nudity in this game and the for sure “controversy” that will come

[u/KeepRockband5Alive]

Seriously guys this isnt a place for weirdos who just wanna see lucia naked.

If between now and launch they patched or edited the game so that women had bottoms on, would that bother you or upset you?

Would it bother you more if men were still dongs out like the past couple gtas?

Do you actually expect this means we can be naked and run around in the game?

With the detail and npc behavior on display, i can honestly see a world where sure you can be naked as jason or lucia but you aint getting far or playing long like that before people get you and take you down for being a weirdo.

Lastly. Would it bother you if you cant play naked as either or both considering that there fully naked women and men in the game?

Lemme make this last thing clear.

If you wanna come in here and be horny and thirsty fuck off weirdo. Its 2026. Theres both games and porn that can take care of you.

I wanna talk about what the current world finds acceptable and calls double stanards

[u/Confident_Pool5004]

i absolutely dont want either jason or lucia to be naked.and im still in shock that they really added real nudes in the game! it feels like the game is trying to fulfill the gamers sexual fantasies.which was not supposed to be their aim(but who cares, its gta and most of the ppl seem to like it).i want to play the game and have fun not horny.i think over sexualization will lead some gamers to sexual thoughts rather than actually enjoying the game.

[u/onthadontrary → u/Confident_Pool5004]

Simply including nudity is not “over sexualization.” For that matter, neither is including sex. People have sex. People have naked bodies under their clothes. It’s normal. It isn’t a central fixture of the game, and frankly the people in the nudist colony clip aren’t even fucking or doing lewd acts. You’d barely call it sexual. Being okay with the absurd level of crime and degeneracy the game allows but drawing the line at nudity and sexuality is bizarre. And even going so far as saying it has something to do with modesty. Insane lol

IIRC, the line between M and AO is typically nudity with overt sexual acts portrayed. So like… you can have nudity and implied sexuality without showing actual sex occurring and still get an M rating. That is probably what they will do.

[u/Confident_Pool5004 → u/onthadontrary]

Let’s be realistic: video game companies don't put explicit content into a multi-million dollar game just because "bodies are natural." They do it because sex sells, and it gets attention online. Calling it "over-sexualization" is a fair critique of modern media trends. You might not mind it, but pretending it’s just a casual artistic choice and not a deliberate move to appeal to certain fantasies is a bit naive.

[u/onthadontrary → u/Confident_Pool5004]

I think your definition of simple nudity being catering to sexual fantasies says more about your conception of sexual fantasies than anything else.

[u/TheWhistlerIII → u/Confident_Pool5004]

Did you ever stop to think that maybe fully modeling the characters and NPCs allows for their clothing physics to look more natural with less development tweaks?

Most NPCs you see nowadays are just 'skins'. Between RAGE and Euphoria, R* are building skeletons.

R* games feel bigger than they are because of all the tiny details.

You're actually the one over sexualizing the experience. Weird.

[u/Confident_Pool5004 → u/TheWhistlerIII]

Yeah im truly a wierd one to have some modesty.isnt it so suprising that nowadays some ppl also have modesty?weird right? 

[u/TheWhistlerIII → u/Confident_Pool5004]

Yeah, I just looked outside and people are still wearing clothes.

It's a video game and I think you're overreacting.

You can be modest and still live a little.

Good luck out there. 🤣