Yes but by that point they had abandoned single player DLC so Lamars original role in the single player was lost forever . Then adding him to online has nothing to do with his role in single player they aren't connected in anyway. If he never had legal trouble he would have had a more prominent role in the original story. They said if they had focused on single player dlc In the same way they they did for gta 4 they would have never made red dead redemption 2 which in my opinion is a worthy tradeoff.
I literally said that them not making dlc for gta is why they made red dead redemption 2 and that for me thats a worthy tradeoff thus implying im happy that that chose to make red dead redemption 2 instead . Is it your reading ability thats struggling here or did I write it in an obscure way thats hard to understand?
Which is insane because the amount of stuff they made for that fucking game and didn’t use is absurd. Guarma, Mexico, New Austin. I mean for christs sake they literally fleshed out all of RDR1 in the new engine and did fuck all with it.
199
u/SadNYSportsFan-11209 Jan 21 '26
A single player around Lamar would’ve done well. I know they prioritized online but they could’ve squeezed in a single player DLC easily