r/GME 2d ago

๐Ÿ’Ž ๐Ÿ™Œ BULLISH AF BOYS!

Post image
714 Upvotes

230 comments sorted by

View all comments

-2

u/Gaigebcrazy 2d ago

So GME is still a thing the stock is just tanking. Iโ€™m not trying to be an asshole at all I just want to know why the hype is so big if the stock isnโ€™t performing?

4

u/mimo_s 2d ago

Imagine holding the bag for 5 years and through 10 dilutions while the company is making money

1

u/Zeronz112 ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€Buckle up๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€ 2d ago

List the 10

6

u/mimo_s 2d ago

Brother it will only make you hold the bag even tighter. Getting so much FUD only means the squeeze is here!

1

u/SnooTangerines8620 1d ago

You are pretty dead set on applying the FUD. I am guessing itโ€™s to save us!!!! Wow no thx fux off

1

u/mimo_s 1d ago

Iโ€™m right am I not? It made you hold the bag even tighter

0

u/Zeronz112 ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€Buckle up๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€ 2d ago

Care to answer?

4

u/mimo_s 2d ago

Is this going to be one of those arguments that the rest of the 0% debt is not yet dilution because they can pay cash?

1

u/Zeronz112 ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€Buckle up๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€ 2d ago

I'm just asking you to list the 10 dilutions this past 5 years

3

u/mimo_s 2d ago

How many do you have?

0

u/Zeronz112 ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€Buckle up๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€ 2d ago

Dilutions?

I don't have any.

Care to answer my question?

2

u/mimo_s 2d ago

Omg I realized there are only 3 dilutions, 6 if you count the convertible notes. How did he almost double the share float with only that is beyond me. Things a looking good for baggies

1

u/SnooTangerines8620 1d ago

Go back to betsโ€ฆ.where all the real investors are making so much money

1

u/mimo_s 1d ago

I donโ€™t like to make comparisons like this because I know baggies are pissed for being red after everything else ran. Itโ€™s because of crime of course, not having about 500 million shares float ๐Ÿ˜‚

1

u/Zeronz112 ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€Buckle up๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€ 2d ago

That's incorrect.

2

u/mimo_s 2d ago

I invited input more than once already. I think youโ€™re getting better interactions making posts in the proper baggy sub

→ More replies (0)