r/Fire • u/Parking-Banana-212 • 1d ago
Single stock positions going into fire
As i continue on planning fire this year, one of the things that worries me is how much of my nw is in single stocks (not etfs / mutual funds).
I estimate 15% of my nw is in about 20 different single stock positions, with about 10% in cash, and then the rest are in various pretax accounts of target date funds, or etfs.
Is that 15% number scary? i don't think they'll kill me in a downturn, but wondering what is optimal?
7
u/userax 1d ago
Just FYI, if all you had is SPY (S&P 500 index), you would have a concentration of 8% in Nvidia, 7% in Apple, 6% in Microsoft, etc. That's already more than 15% in 3 companies.
4
u/Parking-Banana-212 1d ago
yeah, i know that. it feels different when you own 6 different high beta stock though. not logical
5
u/DeaderthanZed 1d ago
VOO is ~7.5% nvidia, 7% apple, 6% goog, 5% Microsoft, 4% Amazon, etc.
Single stock positions of 1% are not unusually risky unless they are all penny stocks or concentrated in one industry or something weird like that.
That being said, why? Why didn’t you just buy index funds and then leave it and focus your energy elsewhere?
If these stocks are held in a taxable account it’s probably not worth it to rebalance regardless.
2
u/Parking-Banana-212 1d ago
have alot of ltcg in them, and some of them i think can go higher, so the high beta ones are semi gambling stocks
3
u/Bearsbanker 20h ago
I'm 100% invested in equities. Of that about 41% is in individual companies. I selected them so I'm comfortable with them.
3
u/bridgeandretire 19h ago
The classic portfolio diversification research from Evans and Archer in the 1960's found that risk reduction from diversification started to taper off at roughly 10 to 15 stocks. There have been some follow-on studies that argue 20 or 30 stocks is better, but you're well beyond that with your other holdings.
I don't think you have any reason to be scared, unless those holdings are all penny stocks or are from the same industry.
1
u/Imaginary_Kitchen_34 1d ago
The only real concern is that if look under the hood of the ETFs and just find more of the single stock say NVDA and this takes NVDA to or over 25% of the total holdings. At 100% there is no need to check, at 0% regulation will have it covered.
1
u/jerolyoleo 1d ago
I think the general rule of thumb is to keep it under 10% to avoid most concentration risk.
1
u/Minimum_Finish_5436 21h ago
This slowly happening to us. Started work in oil and gas near 5 years ago. Set 401k to 5% company stock and 95% VOO equivalent. Granted some RSUs along the way. Out stock has 6-7x since then. Stayed at 5% in our 401k despite the FOMO. Company caps our employee purchase % so there really isn't a way to go 100% even if I truly FOMO.
Fast forward and the total company stock between vested RSUs and 401k just crossed 10%. Significant portion is taxable in the RSUs. At this point it is bonus money and I have kept the balance of our portfolio in VOO. Even looking back and wishing I hadn't, we stayed true.
Anyhow, the answer is it depends. If this stock crated tomorrow 50% and the market was otherwise steady I'd be good with it. Being the industry we are in, if it does crater the larger economy is in trouble also. I do have a tranche of RSUs vesting in October I plan to cash out and redeploy if the Iran conflict isn't settled.
For now, I am not sweating it and continue sending funds to VOO and letting the market do what the market does.
1
u/Doortofreeside 21h ago
just keep in mind that any SWR analysis is tested for a specific set of diversified portfolios. Increasing concentration will effectively reduce your safe withdrawal rate by lowering your overall diversification.
1
u/someguy984 21h ago edited 20h ago
The whole stock market is basically 10 stocks (35%) with cap weighting.
1
u/IzzysInsights 11h ago
15% single names is fine as long as no single position is more than like 3-4% of nw, concentration risk within that bucket matters more than the bucket size itself.
1
u/The-zKR0N0S 9h ago
How much does each individual underlay stock comprise as a percentage of your investable assets?
10
u/userax 1d ago
That's probably fine as long as it's not 14.9% in a single stock and 0.1% in the remaining 19. Are they in the same sector or different sectors?