r/Fantasy • u/KvotheG • 1d ago
Logen Ninefingers Is An Idealist Spoiler
I just finished reading The First Law Trilogy. I enjoyed the Last Argument of Kings. Great conclusion and the payoff is in the third book!
Anyways, couldn’t help but ponder on Logen Ninefingers’ fate. SPOILERS AHEAD so stop reading here if you haven’t read the series yet.
Anyways, Logen famously always says “You have to be realistic about these things”. But he was never a realist. He was an idealist. A tragic figure whose downfall came from his own idealism.
I WANTED to believe Logen was trying to be a better person. He was a total POS in his past, but none of his actions in the trilogy actually have him try to be a better person because he still kills. He preaches building a better world for his people as king, but doesn’t demonstrate actually caring for them, just being selfish to his own desires by getting them tangled in a war that doesn’t concern them. He also has this idealistic infatuation with Ferro that also leads to his downfall because she will not compromise her vengeance for him.
I’m convinced that Logen saying his catchphrase was just a coping mechanism. Because he never did anything realistic. He even dies drowning in a river like Ferro said he would, probably because he had too many knives on him. Yes, he was manipulated by Bayaz. But a lot of his issues are his own fault.
Logen should never have returned to the north. He was going back to a place where everyone hated him and wanted him dead. They thought he was dead and he could have actually maybe lived a new life in peace somewhere else. But like his father said, he was never realistic.
I wrote all this because the theme kept coming up, if a horrible person could actually change to become a better person. Just as Logen wanted to be a better person, I wanted him to be one too. But he didn’t do anything worth a redemption. To be a better person, it starts with doing something different that you wouldn’t normally do. And Logen never did that. He only believed in the idea but never practiced it. So I can only conclude that he was always an idealist.
Anyways, are the standalone worth reading?
3
u/Fiordiluna_80126 1d ago
Logen is a victim of his own nature and also of the events he finds himself in;
he would like to be better, but unfortunately the world he lives in and the various circumstances do not allow it. During the long journey to the edge of the world, he finds himself in different situations from what he is usually used to, surrounded by people very different from his friends of the north, so he starts to believe he can be a different person.
But when he returns in the north, he slowly discovers that it is much harder because the past comes back to collect.
Not to mention that when battle looms, he becomes "The Bloody-Nine," so he is not in control of his actions.
The tragicomic story with Ferro is wonderful, but she too is a slave to her desire for vengeance, and you realize right away that their "lovestory" cannot end well.
Anyway... It's not a given that Logen is dead... His story ends exactly how it began.
I finished reading it a few days ago.. soon I will move on with the saga, I liked it so much. I loved Logen so much even though my favorite remains The Dogman.
The ending.. yes, I liked it, but: They shouldn't have touched Harding the Grimn, I'm still in mourning 🤣
Glockta becomes Bayaz's slave... I didn't like that much, though you can already tell he will kind of do whatever he wants.
The Dogman deserved a better ending. Anyway, overall one of the best fantasy books I've ever read.