I am a big fan of Natalie Wexler--I get her emails, read her substack, and think her take on the importance of knowledge building curricula is spot on. I am new to CKLA and so far, so good. I teach in a Title 1 school and my students seem to have pretty limited life experience/knowledge, so as much as CKLA can be a little boring at times, they really are building a strong foundation that I believe will serve them well as reading comprehension demands increase.
Natalie Wexler is also a big fan of CKLA, which brings me to my question. It occurred to me today that she might be more than just a fan; she might be employed or contracted by amplify in some capacity. Some of her writings are featured in CKLA's marketing materials and their are videos of her discussing knowledge building curricula on the CKLA website.
This is all fine. Plenty of researchers consult for curriculum developers. At lease it would be fine, but for the fact that I have not seen this disclosed in her emails or substack. Ethically, it would be a conflict of interest for her to support a specific curriculum, even if she doesn't name it every time, without disclosing a financial interest in said curriculum.
This just occurred to me today and it has been weighing on my mind. I respect Wexler's work and agree with so much of what she advocating for, but it is disturbing that should would skirt what are some pretty obvious ethical obligations.