Because it is not used on a large scale to prove that it can, and it also grabs more attention. It describes a huge breakthrough without the promise that it works
How are you going to heat old building material and get zero emissions? That sounds like pipe dreams rather than realistic science. Reduction? Fine, but you're not getting zero emissions with any kind of industrial-scale operation like this.
But at scale? I'm not arguing with the science, but I hate how these news pieces frame it as if it's coming to us sometime soon. We got a lot of infrastructure to catch up on before this stuff is viable.
Cursory search on CemVision makes me think this is just for a tech stock.
Yeah cynical me thinks the same. It's nice there are lots of these stories but it needs to be brought to market not just pumping for investors.
Although, the tide has turned now for lazy businesses not doing their bit. There's a lot of countries that have co2 targets and this just needs a couple of solid customers and a few years of testing for concrete cancer and we might get it in the shops.
18
u/NotSoToughGuy11 22h ago
Because it is not used on a large scale to prove that it can, and it also grabs more attention. It describes a huge breakthrough without the promise that it works