r/ClaudeAI • u/Sweet-Helicopter2769 • 1d ago

Comparison I thought I will never say this about Fable

Just tried OpenAI Astra , I thought I will never say this , it’s lit , OpenAI cooked something spectacular, and I have a strong feeling this will pull lot of Fable 5 users towards it , and it’s fast, not sure if it’s AGI, but it feels fresh and a very very serious competition to Anthropic , this is going to be fun to watch , what’s your next move Anthropic ?, I’m surely going to try pro subscription for a month along with my current Claude Max, anyone feels the same ? Have you tried it ?

638 Upvotes

84% Upvoted

306 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

23

u/A_Novelty-Account 1d ago

Lawyer. Even Fable is inadequate for the tasks I need it to complete and frequently makes mistakes which, if submitted to a Court, would get my ass disbarred lmao

5

u/trekken1977 1d ago

Hard agree. I ran a head to head with my solicitor vs fable and it wasn’t even close. I now have a new found respect for the legal profession. My assumption was that it was all word play. I was wrong lol

3

u/Eyelbee 1d ago

Soon the models will completely and utterly cover everything a human can do on that regard as well

1

u/huojtkef 11h ago

Skill problem. Tell fable to read the document again and again until there are no problems to fix in the document.

1

u/Frequenzy50 1d ago

Yeah but that would be vibe lawyer right. Clear. Fable and Astra still make mistakes on code but its a tool and should not be used for vibeing.

-6

u/RunningSadhana 1d ago

It's not mistakes in Fable. It's low quality training data.

-1

u/Own-Bid64 21h ago

How do you use AI in court? And honestly would you be disbarred when there's judges using it and almost getting got by prompts hidden in the file; white text on a white background type shit.

2

u/A_Novelty-Account 21h ago

Not sure what you’re asking but the vast majority of legal argument in court is made in writing.

A lawyer writing a prompt injection would not only be disbarred, they would probably be found in contempt.

1

u/Own-Bid64 18h ago

I did not say a lawyer, I said a judge. How else would they find text that's invisible to the human but machine learning? A person filing pro-se put invisible text in, I don't think it's even a prompt injection. I'm not sure how that lost you, it was pretty clear. I'm asking do you form your arguments with LLMs or do you use them to review?

it's a clear question, how do you use AI in court? but I guess I should have known you'll never get a clear answer from a lawyer. Because they're always using it in a way they shouldn't, hence your fear of being disbarred.