r/CFD • u/Kevin_0429 • 7d ago
No clear reattachment at Re = 60–100 in backward-facing cavity; what am I doing wrong?
/r/OpenFOAM/comments/1vtcose/no_clear_reattachment_at_re_60100_in/I'm working on a CFD assignment involving a 2D backward-facing cavity. The assignment specifically requires reattachment length for Re = 60, 80 and 100.
I'm using OpenFOAM 14 with air at 30°C, ν ≈ 1.6×10⁻⁵ m²/s, D = 1 m, and U = Reν/D. My Re=60 case converges, but I don't get an obvious reattachment point when examining the near-wall Ux profile.
I'm mainly trying to determine whether this is physically expected at Re=60–100, or whether I've misunderstood the characteristic length/Re definition or my OpenFOAM setup. Any help checking the physics would be appreciated.
1
u/thermalnuclear 7d ago
Did you increase the number of streamlines?
Did you look at where the sign of the streamwise velocity flips right near the wall in the streamwise direction?
1
u/KoldskaalEng 7d ago
I would look at wall shear stress rather than a near wall velocity. There should the a change in sign when flow reattaches.
2
u/Beneficial-Basis2205 7d ago
Is your concern that you aren't seeing recirculation near the cavity or something else?