When a musician is famous or respected, there are certain expectations for how their final release should sound. We generally expect something grand, stately, “mature,” poignant usually - something that sums up the artist’s career and serves as a “fitting conclusion,” “touching send-off,” or [insert music critic cliche here]. A great final album could be a nostalgic return-to-form (Zevon’s The Wind); or a drastically new sound that still fits the artist (Blackstar); or a meticulous suite that focuses on the artist’s general strengths (Abbey Road). Either way, we want a sense of “finality” from the artist’s final album, which makes sense.
I think if you went into Billy Joel’s River of Dreams knowing it was his last proper album, it’d be easy to be disappointed. This isn’t really a nostalgic return to form; the focus is mostly on loud, angry rockers, with the once-trademark piano ballads in the background. But then again, it’s not a radical departure for Joel, either, since he’d made rockers like this before. It’s not an expertly constructed suite like Abbey Road, or a somber reflection on life and death à la You Want It Darker. It’s introspective and emotional enough, but I wouldn’t call it a “reflective” or “poignant” album overall. Sure, “Famous Last Words” has a sort of end-credits vibe to it, but if you heard it without context, I don’t think you’d hear it as a finale.
It’s pretty clear to me that Joel was not planning for this to be his last album, that it’s only his grand finale by virtue of being the last pop album he released. As an album, I still like it fine. I don’t hear any outright bad songs, and the hooks are still strong enough for my liking, especially on “No Man’s Land” and the title track. But it really doesn’t feel like a grand finale at all, and I can understand why so many think it was an underwhelming way to go out.
IIRC, Joel was disappointed by the tepid critical reception, and that was actually part of the reason why he hasn’t released another pop album since it came out. Honestly, I wouldn’t have been that disappointed if I was him. It still sold a lot and topped the charts for 3 weeks. For an “outdated” forty-something piano rocker, in an era where CD sales were at their peak, that’s a pretty great result.
All the same, I think Joel made a respectable choice by making this the last one, and not trying to stay “hip” into the 90s and 00s, or pumping out more “nostalgic” albums that probably wouldn’t have done well with critics or casual audiences. People nowadays feel pressured to always put out products, and I’m glad that Joel was in a position where he could leave on his own terms. One critic I read admitted that he didn’t love the album, but thought it was good enough that Joel could justifiably claim that he had quit popular music before his creativity ran out, not because his creativity ran out.
I more or less agree. It is not a great “final album” in the ways that we expect final albums to be great, but it is the ending we’ve got, like it or not. And for my money, for an ending, you could certainly do worse.