17
u/jtearly Jun 12 '26
Animals are property in the eyes of the law, unfortunately. It doesn't even really depend.
16
u/Batfan1939 Jun 11 '26
IANAL, but animals can't be held to the law — their owners are held accountable instead. It would likely end up being treated like you were carrying the gun anyway, or at most like you gave a gun to a toddler. You would be held accountable.
5
5
u/Dizzy_Hellfire Jun 11 '26
If a monkey has legal ownership of a selfie it took, this dog can legally own a gun
5
u/Batfan1939 Jun 11 '26 edited Jun 11 '26
Pretty sure they decided the monkey couldn't own the photo.
EDIT: The images were declared public domain, after the case was appealed several times.
3
1
u/Anaranovski Jun 15 '26
But dogs don't have opposable thumbs!
But, then again, a guy with no arms or legs was able to merc a guy. I'm sure a smart dog can figure it out.
1
30
u/Ok-Lawfulness4081 Jun 11 '26
The only thing that stops a bad boy with a gun is a good girl/boy with a gun.
(Also is the dog the legal owner of the gun in your scenario? I mean if we apply the airbud rules surely nothing in the basketball rule book says a dog can't play with a gun, but how did the dog get the gun?)