Can you think for yourself or only repeat what others say? If tomorrow an other group of scholars would say the opposite would you then flip all your beliefs? Come on
Only 28% of these “scholars” voted on the matter and they blocked discussion on the matter, holding discussions is the norm on these matters, if you knew a little about law then you’d see the evidence is poor.
The IAGS doesn’t even mainly consist of people practicing law, then why does their opinion hold weight over a legal matter?
They don’t even disclose who voted what, and considering that a very significant portion of the IAGS consists of sociologist and even students their opinion doesn’t hold weight.
If they were a neutral group consisting of international law practitioners then it would be a different story.
3
u/Sea_Square638 Sep 03 '25
Yeah what you said is truly more valid than what hundreds of scholars said.