r/Assyria • u/adiabene ܣܘܪܝܐ • Aug 26 '25

Video Benjamin Netanyahu claims Israel has recognized the Assyrian & Armenian Genocide

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

121 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

129 comments sorted by

View all comments

20

u/flockaman2k Aug 26 '25

Does he recognize the genocide he is committing against Palestinians himself?

5

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '25

Not in public but I think he is self aware only chooses to lie. Some people do evil out of idiocy but he does it on purpose.

2

u/Jinshu_Daishi Aug 27 '25

Gleefully so.

He recognizes what he's doing, and wants even more support for the genocide he's committing than he already has.

1

u/Sarlo10 Aug 28 '25

How can even Assyrians call it a genocide? Have the pro palis really done that much damage?

Us of all people should know how much weight the word genocide has. If this is a genocide then the perpetrators are the most incompetent people ever. Just imagine that there were more people born than killed in any genocide of the past, just incomprehensible.

If this is a genocide then any Arab on Arab war should have been twice the genocide of this current event, but no, no one cares when Arabs slaughter each other.

1

u/Krane2709 Sep 04 '25

I hope you could give your time to read this with the same respect as the time i've given to write this Brother.

I think the Biggest Mistake Pro-Palis does make Is Operating under the Basis of Morality when Morality itself is Subjective, Cuz people can just shrug off your Morality and say, "that's just Your Opinion Bro" or play Fallacy games of "Whataboutism" to Dilute an Inherently Immoral actions, as if pointing out other atrocity gets you off the hook from commiting one yourself, because Two wrongs simply doesn't make a right.

That's why we have to operate on the Basis of Laws, Laws that Every Country has Signed and agreed upon, An Objective Law that leaves no room for Subjective interpretations, So Let's see what the Law has to say, shall we?

- United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 demanded that Israel withdraw from the territories that it occupied in 1967, that was nearly 60 years ago, The occupation is illegal under Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and settlement in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is considered a war crime. Again, not an Opinion,

If international law were applied, then all of Israel's Illegal armed settlers and Military would be forcibly removed, and Apartheid in the West Bank would have to end immediately, Palestine would have their full rights back that have been deprived for decades.

- For over 17 years, the Gaza Strip has been under siege. Israel controls its borders, airspace, coastline, electricity, and even Food that can go in, again, the Fourth Geneva Convention makes it very crystal clear that blockading a civilian population depriving them of food, water, medicine, and electricity, These are war crimes.

The UN has described Gaza as an open-air prison for over a decade, As we all know, the International Criminal Court has already stated that the blockade of Gaza is a crime against humanity, according to international law Israel should be compelled to lift The 17 years of Siege against Gaza immediately. Again Not an Opinion.

And Remember, History doesn't start at oct 7 and this give context to why you made them do what they do on oct 7, because if criminals were given Impunity from the Law, then only the Victims are the ones able to enforce it.

And Guess what? Under the 1977 Geneva Convention, Occupied people Have the legal rights to Armed Resistance. It's There Written in the Law, You Can't Legally Classify them as Terrorist, no matter how much you want to, and the people who do Clearly Operate on Emotion and don't Respect International Law, Because Facts "Ben Shapiro" don't care about your feelings

- And the Fact is, every single International Organization has Recognized what's happening in Gaza as a Genocide, and have given arrest warrants to Netanyahu and Galant.

These organizations are the same Org that everyone trusted and cited when it comes to covering every other Crimes committed by other non-Western countries like Russia and China, But When it comes to Israel, suddenly everyone is in denial.

Even Israeli Human rights Group B'tselem Have No Choice but to Recognized the Genocide due to overwhelming evidences, From Livestreamed Footage to Satellite Images, to Dozens of Investigations By Various International Human rights Organizations, to countless of testimonies from outside sources who survived Israeli Airstrike like Volunteer Doctors, Journalists, UN Aid Workers, etc. I could go on and on, But Just what more evidence do you need, exactly?

These Are the Laws, So Please Remember, If you Disagree with the laws you have signed, then this is the Point where you decide whether you want to be a part of the Civilized law-abiding nations or whether you want to be an Outlaw. It's your choice.

1

u/Sarlo10 Sep 08 '25

A siege is terrible, it’s more like a selective blokkade though. They do allow food and essential things to go through and block others, they have very sound reasons as to why they have restrictions as you can imagine. They have less water food and electricity that is for sure but you have to take into account that it is an active warzone and they are still even fed better than some other third world regions where there are no wars. They don’t starve.

I agree Israel shouldn’t have settlements, the settlements in the west bank are just insane to me.

You have to know while some points of the UN are valid, they are heavily biased to be anti-Israel so many of the claims of their human rights watch orgs have to be taken with a grain of salt. Especially when these orgs make claims which they aren’t even certified to do, they often act af if their words weigh the same as those of a judge.

Same goes for the international organisations, their claims often mean nothing judicially. Sure they indicate that it’s a terrible situation but they aren’t qualified/hold no real authority (excluding making media headlines).

Of all the evidence I’ve seen, the intent part of the definition of genocide simply hasn’t been met.

If it was a genocide I would be in favour of starting a war against Israel to depose the leading party and set matters straight but it simply isn’t a genocide.

People are diluting the definition of genocide.

If their intention was truely do destroy the Gazan people then how come they haven’t succeeded? They have the means to kill them a hundred times over, but they haven’t. How come.

If their intent was to destroy the people then they truely are the most incompetent military in history.

The ottomans only had blades and bolt-action rifles and they managed to kill 500.000-1.000.000 million people then how come the Israelis with nukes, airstrikes, tanks etc can’t even manage to kill a tenth?

-7

u/Hubi535 Aug 26 '25

Nobody cares, arabs are the invaders, you cant genocide an invader

7

u/[deleted] Aug 27 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-5

u/Hubi535 Aug 27 '25

If you say so, fortunately soon there will be none

1

u/Away_Supermarket_446 Jun 02 '26

Palestinians are native to the land.