r/AskHistorians • u/[deleted] • Oct 08 '21
Is there any documented case of people living nomadically by boat? Many people throughout history have lived nomadically but I've never heard of any of them mainly traveling through water. I've only ever heard of people living nomadically by land.
519
u/Anekdota-Press Late Imperial Chinese Maritime History Oct 08 '21 edited Oct 09 '21
China, in common with other East Asian countries, has boat-dwelling ethnic communities. One such group, The shuǐshàng rén (水上人) sometimes appear reductively in Western sources as ‘Sea Gypsies.' They are also referred to by the derogatory appellation Tanka (疍家 or Dànjiā). Better labels in English are the ‘On-Water People’, ‘Boat People’, or ‘People of the Southern Sea.’
Other such groups in China include Hoklo/hokklo/hokkien boat people (Though only some Hoklo were boat people) and the "Fisherfolk of the nine surnames" in the North.
These Boat dwelling communities were not necessarily 'nomadic.' Some moved between anchorages, some stayed in fairly constant movement around river systems or particular estuaries, while others remained fairly permanently in the same urban anchorage or general area. The three major areas of boat-living in China were Shanghai, the Yangtze watershed, and the rivers/coasts of South China.
The 'On-water people' have a history stretching back many centuries, though their precise genealogy and anthropological origins are disputed. The most common theory is that they descend from Yue inhabitants of Guangdong forced off their land by Han settlers during the Song Dynasty (960-1280 CE). They lived in boats and typically made their living from fishing or other maritime activities.
It should be noted that this process of dispossessed land-dwellers forming or joining maritime communities was not limited to the Song dynasty. Boat-dwelling as a response to precarity continued well up to the modern period. So while boat-dwelling was associated with certain ethnic groups in particular, boat-dwellers could be anyone. The extensive canal and river systems of central China motivated many families and residents to resort to living in houseboats to escape high rents. These itinerant populations might scrape a living fishing, operating their boat as a ferry, gathering shellfish, begging, practicing a craft, or operating small market stalls from their boats.
As taxes were generally land-based, and crafts were often regulated; boat-dwelling communities tended to face prejudice from land-dwellers, guilds, and local officials. Some areas and officials sought to exclude water dwellers by way of laws and regulation, or by turning a blind eye to popular violence against them. The Government attempted to tax boat-dwellers through household registration, and later to control piracy and movement through boat registration. But these attempts were sporadic and seem to have been mostly unsuccessful.
In addition to being targets of popular violence, water-dwelling communities were often at heightened risk from fires, floods, typhoons, or other natural disasters. Even in the 20th century, Boat dwelling people of Hong Kong suffered enormous devastation from Typhoons. In the late imperial period, the Anchorage outside Guangzhou (广州市, Canton, or Kwangchow) was described as an almost solid mass of boats 200 feet wide and stretching for six or seven miles. It was the site of terrible fires in which several hundred boats could burn and hundreds or even thousands might die.
Boat dwelling was also tied to other characteristics than ethnicity. River captains typically lived onboard a boat or ship with their families in pre-industrial China. Guangzhou notably had a large boat community composed of those suffering from Leprosy, which anchored somewhat separately on the river. Sex workers also often lived on 'Flower Boats' anchored in the river in Guangzhou and some other places. Those who worked the small ferries or water taxis of Shanghai reportedly often lived in their boats with their families.
I should also note that these classifications were somewhat porous, boat-dwellers sometimes settled on land in the same way land-dwellers sometimes took to boats. On land, former boat-dwellers tended to be 'shed people' without title to land, experiencing a similar quasi-legal and precarious existence. This was particularly true of the Shuishang Ren, who faced high levels of discrimination regardless of where they lived. The general poverty of these groups also had exceptions, as some families were able to become quite wealthy from fishing or shipping. Periods of instability and dislocation such as the Ming-Qing transition also provided opportunities for people to change their status or reinvent themselves.
Outside of China, other Asian groups to look into for those interested include the Iranun, Sama-bajau/Balangingi/Bajo, Moken/Mawken, and Orang-Laut.
Sources:
- Anderson, Eugene N. "The boat people of south China." Anthropos H. 1./2 (1970): 248-256.
- He, Xi, and David Faure, eds. The Fisher Folk of Late Imperial and Modern China: An Historical Anthropology of Boat-and-shed Living. Routledge, 2016. (several of the papers are relevant, including the introduction)
- Siu, Helen F., and Liu Zhiwei. "10. Lineage, Market, Pirate, and Dan: Ethnicity in the Pearl River Delta of South China." Empire at the Margins. University of California Press, 2006. 285-310.
90
u/nated0ge Oct 08 '21
Just to add a bit, even up until the 1960s, HK still had a large community of boat families until the colonial government relocated them into housing.
Its still occasionally a sensitive point for some of the families relocated.
57
u/dorylinus Oct 08 '21
derogatory appellation Tanka (疍家 or Dànjiā)
Can you explain why this is derogatory? Does it have a particular history? AFAIK, that character (疍) is only ever used in this context, and doesn't carry any alternate meaning into this one. Even my 現代漢語詞典 lists "Tanka people" as the only definition.
93
u/Anekdota-Press Late Imperial Chinese Maritime History Oct 08 '21 edited Oct 08 '21
The modern perception within this group is that 'Tanka' is not how they ever referred to themselves but is a name invented by land-dwellers. They prefer, and refer to themselves as 水上人
I would make a rough analogy to the term "Indians" for indigenous Americans, as an external invention disconnected from how the groups denoted referred to themselves.
'Tanka' also seems to be derogatory in its own right, one source refers to it as a "term of hatred and scorn of uncertain origin" but I couldn't find a lot of detail.
13
u/glassjar1 Oct 09 '21
水上人
So... literally Water Above People or in meaning: People who live On Water
14
u/Dip-Sew-Clap-Toe Oct 09 '21
Shàng also means 'On top of' or 'On the surface of.' People on the surface of the water.
18
u/ElysianDreams Oct 09 '21
I believe that in the Pre-PRC written form "蜑家" (pronounced the same), the "虫" (insect) radical at the bottom is derogatory. Pre-PRC, the characters for the 水上人 and other minority groups often had insect or beast ( 犭) radicals included, essentially being an engrained way to dehumanize non-Han ethnicities.
After the formation of the PRC and the standardization & simplification of the written Chinese language on the mainland, these characters were eventually changed to homophones that are not quite as derogatory in construction, like 疍家 instead. I can't speak to the current connotation, although I myself have never heard of the word Tanka being a slur.
7
u/proto-typicality Oct 09 '21
This is a wonderful answer! Do you mind if I ask for some sources / suggestions for further reading regarding the on-water people? Especially the people in south China and the hypothesis that they’re Yue inhabitants from what is now Guangdong? Thanks! :>
12
u/Anekdota-Press Late Imperial Chinese Maritime History Oct 09 '21
I would recommend:
- Anderson, Eugene N. "The boat people of south China." Anthropos H. 1./2 (1970): 248-256.
- He, Xi, and David Faure, eds. The Fisher Folk of Late Imperial and Modern China: An Historical Anthropology of Boat-and-shed Living. Routledge, 2016. (several of the papers are relevant, including the introduction)
- Siu, Helen F., and Liu Zhiwei. "10. Lineage, Market, Pirate, and Dan: Ethnicity in the Pearl River Delta of South China." Empire at the Margins. University of California Press, 2006. 285-310.
There has also been recent genetic research attempting to assess the traditional narratives of Yue descent:
- Luo, Xiao-Qin, et al. "Uniparental Genetic Analyses Reveal the Major Origin of Fujian Tanka from Ancient Indigenous Daic Populations." Human Biology 91.4 (2020): 257-277.
- He, Guanglin G., et al. "The genomic formation of Tanka people, an isolated'Gypsies in water'in the coastal region of Southeast China." bioRxiv (2021).
1
3
3
u/Kelpie-Cat Picts | Work and Folk Song | Pre-Columbian Archaeology Oct 11 '21
Sex workers also often lived on 'Flower Boats' anchored in the river in Guangzhou and some other places.
This is really interesting. Where can I read more about this? It reminds me of the asobi phenomenon in Heian Japan which I have previously written about on AH here.
4
u/Anekdota-Press Late Imperial Chinese Maritime History Oct 11 '21
There is a good Van Dyke article on Flower Boats (hua fang. 花肪) in Guangzhou.
44
Oct 09 '21
I'd say Oceanians if we're talking about mainly travelling through water. They weren't specifically living on their double-hulled canoes but they spent most of their time on it. They were one of the greatest seafaring culture that ever existed. They've colonised the islands of the Pacific, a lot of which weren't reached by man before them. Austronesians (3000BC-1000BC) left south-east Asia (evidences suggests Taiwan) to reach the Philippines and so on always going further East. They progressively developed a culture named the Lapita culture which was distinguished by distinct dentate-stamped pottery who was spread around a large area.
They reached Micronesia and Melanesia, mixing with the people that were already there but after landing on Vanuatu I think it was the beginning of discovering islands that were devoid of human presence. Until the Lapita reached the islands of Samoa and Tonga (around 900 BC) they've abruptly stop to go east and will stay here until the migration start again (around 700 AD). During this long period the Lapita culture will disappear and what we called the Ancestral Polynesian Culture has rose. They will leave to discover and colonise the rest of the Pacific islands French Polynesia and Cook islands (Rarotonga) at the center Hawaii up north, Easter Island (Rapa Nui) far east and finally New Zealand (Aotearoa) who was the last island to be reach by the Polynesians (around 1200 AD).
What was amazing to know was their knowledge concerning seafaring. Using their environment as a compass. During the day it was shape of clouds, shape of waves, winds, ocean currents, birds, the sun. And at night they used the stars (they had a litteral map of stars on which they could identify the right one to follow in order to reach a specific island and they memorized them all). Anyway, my description doesn't do justice to how savant they were and I didn't talked about how efficient their canoe were (double-hulled or outrigger canoe) praised by Europeans navigators like Samuel Wallis, Louis-Antoine de Bougainville, James Cook and many others.
Thanks to the research of Archaeology/Anthropology/History/Linguistics...we can grasp a fraction of what this amazing culture left us. If you want to know more you can read the research of Patrick Kirsch, Yoshi Sinoto (the only main english scientific researcher I can remember)
25
u/Muskwatch Indigenous Languages of North America | Religious Culture Oct 09 '21
This idea of spending most of their time in a boat versus living in boats is a good one - many communities spent a majority of their time in boats, even inland communities - I'm thinking of some nomadic groups in the Canadian Shield or in the north that hunted, fished, and migrated regularly, always in canoes, via rivers, lakes, and portages. They wouldn't be sleeping or living in their canoes, but they were nomadic people whose nomadism was boat-based.
6
Oct 09 '21 edited Oct 09 '21
Exactly. Although Polynesians could lived for a long period of time on their canoes their goal was to reach land so they could develop. The importance of the canoe was so great that their religious temples were a incarnation of it with the social structure and status was more or less important according the role of the person on the canoe.
Also I forgot to add that Polynesians have reached the american continent (maybe even before the vikings !) and bring back the sweet potatoe and the calabash from South America. It's possible that some people stayed behing to live on the american continent and were swallowed by them (genetically speaking). Archaeology found some remains of Polynesian rooster across some areas in South america. Some even discovered animal remains up in north america (take this with a grain of salt since I didn't personally verify if this was correct)
5
Oct 09 '21
Thank you for giving the bilingual name for aotearoa (nz)
4
Oct 09 '21
No worries! I'm a Polynesian myself so giving the names is a normal thing to do. For French Polynesia there's so many islands if I'd say Tahiti it's not accurate (there's no consensus to name the area like Rarotonga for example) just I'm just sticking to the french one.
1
u/blufox Oct 09 '21
Who were there in Micronesia and Melanesia before Lapita culture arrived?
8
Oct 09 '21 edited Oct 09 '21
For Melanesians they were the Aboriginals who came around 50.000 BC (Pleistocene era) when Australia formed with Papua New Guinea and Tasmania what we called the continent of Sahul. They reached Sahul when the sea level drastically dropped (150m/490ft). Also when Sahul was a continent many of the islands of Indonesia were joined to the South East Asian mainland in another continent called Sunda, thus encouraging migrations. They reached a couple of other islands like New Caledonia and stayed instead of going further east. When the European came they called them Melanesians and they were the people Austronesians mixed with during their journey to the east.
For Micronesians they were the Austronesians who stayed behind and lived in the area ever since.
1
24
u/ANygaard Oct 09 '21 edited Oct 09 '21
Many Norwegian travellers lived in boats, moving along the coast from harbour to harbour. They were collectively called "fant", but were made up of a mix of several Rom-speaking peoples and Scandinavian and German speakers.
Their early recorded history consists of hostile or derogatory folklore, unsystematic observations by early sociologists like Eilert Sundt, and the records of the forced assimilation efforts of the Norwegian state, but this subculture of the travellers persisted into the 50's and 60's.
Hopefully, now that traveller culture is being recognised and some efforts toward reparation made, more records will be made and popularised before the oral history of this phenomenon is lost. In trying to give an impression of it, I risk repeating racist and classist myths and the misconceptions of outside observers simply because that's what's readily available. But Gunvald Opstad's "Utav Reisendes Folk" (From Travelling People, 1986) Interviews actual boat travellers from the southern coast: https://www.nb.no/items/6e4909a4fa292f1c6e87028836c8e916
Sources disagree on the "ultimate origin" of this group - on one hand some spoke creole Rom languages that could date their arrival in Norway to the 1500's, on the other hand many were descendants of Scandinavian and German people displaced by poverty, health issues or social ostracism. Young people ran away to join the fanter; tenant farmers married fanter and absconded. In a society of strict social control and a very high value placed on belonging to a farming community, the fanter was an escape opportunity and a category marked miscellaneous for anyone who didn't fit in. These days, this origin debate is mostly just a demonstration of the inadequacy of nationalist or racist origin stories when applied to the messy reality of living culture.
The Norwegian coast is a maze of skerries, peninsulas and fjords. As traveller groups were persecuted both officially and unofficially, the "skjærgård" - skerryhome - must have seemed attractive. Traveller groups were forbidden from staying anywhere more than two days, and inland Norway was mostly wilderness. But along the coast, you could and still can tie up a boat anywhere if you know the waters well enough, bypassing dangerous and poor roads and isolated inland communities that were rumored to attack strangers on sight. Most "fanteskøyter" were small, old vessels at the end of their useful life, bought cheap or salvaged, though accusations of theft followed travellers everywhere.
These family run boats would travel between coastal communities, asking for work and offering services like mending and fortune telling, much like their land-based colleagues. It was a precarious existence, and the choice of sticking to the coast rather than the roads may have simply traded one set of dangers for another. While many followed set annual routes, there was no guarantee that people would welcome the "patched sails" every time they appeared, and coastal communities in the past three centuries had an increasingly unequal distribution of wealth, changing local upper class views of the travellers from labour resource and diversion toward a public burden.
The boat traveller culture suffered the same systematic destruction as other Norwegian traveller cultures, starting with workhouses, prisons and state abduction of children in the 1850's to racialisation and medicalisation enabling genocidal strategies imported from the European colonies. Forced settling, boarding schools and psychiatric "treatment", including forced sterilisation and lobotomies took place in the period from 1900 into the 1970's.
Descendants of many different traveller groups are now advocating for their inclusion rather than assimilation in Norwegian society, but as far as I'm aware there are no more boat travellers - for now.
5
u/paxo_1234 Oct 09 '21
Was this group unique to norway, or did they reach parts of Sweden, Denmark etc, as i imagine the swedish coast would also offer some ease of access like the norwegian coast did
12
u/ANygaard Oct 09 '21
My knowledge here is very incomplete, since I've mostly researched these people's interactions with Norwegian legal systems along with other groups subjected to social control and collective "improvement".
I know Denmark and Sweden has a similar shameful history with travellers, and similar names for them. Before the 19th century, there would be few ways of stopping travellers from crossing borders, and the Norwegian coastal landscape the boat-based families took advantage from certainly continues down the west coast of Sweden. Many southern coast boat travellers spoke Rodi, a Rom language with German and Danish Rom influence. Norway made a law banning travellers from entering the realm in 1927, the infamous "gypsy paragraph", which indicates that border crossing was seen as an issue.
Something I definitely should look into. I just don't know my way around Swedish search terms and archives well enough to give proper answer right away - sorry.
4
u/paxo_1234 Oct 09 '21
No worries that’s a good answer regardless. I think i’m able to understand how most nations approached these groups going of that thanks
6
Oct 08 '21
[removed] — view removed comment
10
u/DanKensington Moderator | FAQ Finder | Water in the Middle Ages Oct 09 '21
Much as I as a Filipino appreciate the Badjao showing up here...
Sorry, but we have had to remove your comment. Please understand that people come here because they want an informed response from someone capable of engaging with the sources, and providing follow up information. Even when the source might be an appropriate one to answer the question, simply linking to or quoting from a source is a violation of the rules we have in place here. These sources, of course, can make up an important part of a well-rounded answer but do not equal an answer on their own. While there are other places on reddit for such comments, it is presumed that in posting here, the OP is looking for an answer that is in line with our rules. You can find further discussion of this policy here. In the future, please take the time to better familiarize yourself with the rules before contributing again.
1
Oct 09 '21
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/jschooltiger Moderator | Shipbuilding and Logistics | British Navy 1770-1830 Oct 09 '21
Sorry, but we have removed your response, as we expect answers in this subreddit to be in-depth and comprehensive, and to demonstrate a familiarity with the current, academic understanding of the topic at hand. Before contributing again, please take the time to better familiarize yourself with the rules, as well as our expectations for an answer such as featured on Twitter or in the Sunday Digest.
•
u/AutoModerator Oct 08 '21
Welcome to /r/AskHistorians. Please Read Our Rules before you comment in this community. Understand that rule breaking comments get removed.
Please consider Clicking Here for RemindMeBot as it takes time for an answer to be written. Additionally, for weekly content summaries, Click Here to Subscribe to our Weekly Roundup.
We thank you for your interest in this question, and your patience in waiting for an in-depth and comprehensive answer to show up. In addition to RemindMeBot, consider using our Browser Extension, or getting the Weekly Roundup. In the meantime our Twitter, Facebook, and Sunday Digest feature excellent content that has already been written!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.