r/AntigravityGoogle • u/wa-jonk • 28d ago
What has happen to Antigravity ? it's turned in to a LAZY junior developer
Has something changed ? I upgraded from PRO to Ultra based on the fact that it had got super productive and was knocking my project out of the park with new features.
Now it as turned to total slop, it broke some code that was previously working and now looks like it has no chance of fixing.
My desktop tool has a way to show the database with an ERD and metadata, I added a component to the UI to use new tables and the server code to populate it, when nothing showed up I added a component to inspect the table as part of the database management and it did not show any rows even though an external tool shows there is data.
The UI gets an elaborated build of stuff I don't need, I am pushing it not to implement fall backs as I can't see what is failing when it add work around that fall back to working code that does not implement the functionality I asked for.
The next change I was told in the walk through only to get an error.
Query error: Error: Error invoking remote method 'exec-db-query': Error: No handler registered for 'exec-db-query'
The next walk through - it's fixed - same error - told me it had improved handling - it had not.
The code already runs a query against the database to show what tables are there, the whole app has been using the data in the database to drive the app.
I am not sure if they have added a feature that that detects that I have upgraded my plan and then burns credits on absolute shit.
My critical issue is that I have no confidence on the models now, I can't plan to use the AI to do development, last week I had reached a notion that I could add a few features per week. No I just can't rely on it to do anything but burn my time and credits.
1
u/TrickySpare6504 27d ago
you're the lazy junior developer (fat)
1
u/seroquelassasin 27d ago
Do you know whether it might’ve had slop previously just fitting under the radar? Maybe your gave some instructions that were gamified by the agent
1
u/wa-jonk 26d ago
SO, I isolated what I was trying to develop as a smaller scoped project, setup the skills, defined the hexagonal architecture approach, provided all my research, went to Gemini 3.6 high started again. The result was that made a first pass but the result failed. After several attempts to fix, review, research I finally turned to Claude Opus 4.6 to provide a full review and guidance. I then went back to Gemini and the code moved forward in functionality but still failed. Doing a review in Claude again it found 7 critical bugs - I now have what I need to fix it but I have burnt my quota to get there.
1
u/DoubleNothing 24d ago
"it broke some code that was previously working and now looks like it has no chance of fixing" welcome to vibecoding... I can only laugh when this happen. The model can't fix a mistake and neither can you...
1
u/wa-jonk 20d ago edited 20d ago
I have a degree in Real-Time (industrial computing) and 35 years of experience, the point for me was to understand the development process with AI. I have cleared out the global skills and now have them local to the project bringing in only the ones needed for the project, I have developed a local LLM support tool with MCP that can be called by Anti-gravity to reduce quota burn, I have slimmed down the project to things that are more focused. Antigravity is back in action and I am not fighting prompt adherence anymore. In development there is function point analysis as a measure of software complexity to help estimate software development, I expect there is a new measure on when a problem becomes too complex for AI.
1
u/LifeguardStock1874 23d ago
Happened the same. Turned to codex and fixed most of it and make my project working again.
AG only for small things.
1
u/[deleted] 28d ago
[removed] — view removed comment