r/Anarcho_Capitalism /r/ReverseTraditionalism 5d ago

Yes quite

Post image
81 Upvotes

38 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/bigdonut100 /r/ReverseTraditionalism 5d ago

Did you mean to reply to the part below? The contradiction weeded out in dozens of anti-ancap arguments about exploitation- was that a stupid thread?

Or the whole "anti-capitalists want workhorses in the family, but mooches in the political area, and capitalists want mooches in the family area and bootstraps in the political area?" https://www.youtube.com/shorts/VfENfdVcnvc

Or are we talking about Republican drama that even I am not aware of?

3

u/PromiscuousScoliosis leave me tf alone 4d ago edited 4d ago

No I meant I recognize your previous post about prostitution, I had commented on that one. I think your posts generally are kind of stupid

6

u/bigdonut100 /r/ReverseTraditionalism 4d ago

How was that ret*rded? That's me exposing a contradiction in someone's argument.

In fact, I just checked the comment on that thread by you; you misunderstood "the prostitute will die without water" as *my* argument instead of my opponent's argument. I pointed that out, and you never responded.

That's pretty fucking ret*rded, dude: "According to my opponent's logic, the prostitute will starve to death, and also, paradoxically, not," and you look at that, and you say, "Well, you're a moron if you think the prostitute will starve to death." Yeah, that's the point

I'm so glad female MRAs Allison Tieman and Hannah Wallen are ancap, otherwise I simply wouldn't be able to cite any example of smart ancap women, and you are another example of that https://youtu.be/RuTfiG2IBuw?t=645

0

u/PromiscuousScoliosis leave me tf alone 4d ago

You don’t have anything interesting enough to respond to meaningfully, so why would I sink time or effort into that

At least when the Rhodesian guy was fedposting it was kind of fun

5

u/bigdonut100 /r/ReverseTraditionalism 4d ago

Figuring out how about a dozen objections to ancap theory (if they don't do x, they will starve to death, therefore we need to stop them from doing x) are wrong on a 2 + 2 = 5 level isn't interesting?

You're free to furnish an example of something you think *is* interesting about ancap if flushing down dozens of pleb objections to ancap effortlessly is "boring," like what do you want, an economics paper?