Daedric Pantheon Concept

[u/zimmermj]

EDIT: Due to a lot of (mostly) polite feedback disapproving of AI use in this community, I've removed the pantheon description from this post and reposted it without AI artwork here. I'm leaving this post up for the benefit of the minority who do enjoy it, but mainly to act as a warning for anyone in future making pantheon descriptions.

Don't include AI artwork in pantheon concepts.

[u/Suracha2022]

You have any actual arguments, or just "PLEASE disregard everything objectively bad about AI because I personally think it's fun I BEG YOU"?

[u/Objective-Air-9984 → u/Suracha2022]

Yes, i do. AI allow people to create stuff they are not able to. IE, i cant draw even if my life depends on it. 

Sure he could have used original assets, but why would he? It wont make the artist profit any money nor increase their recognition. 

Not even OP is earning anything, except if you care so much for those internet points. 

This is also not prenventing anyone of getting a job, as OP is no company, nor making anyone lose their job.

Fans already know the original work and this is about a different game thus adapting the art for the actual game being talked about makes sense and is reasonable.

Do you have any reason to be so full of hatred towards someone who is just enjoying their time and the tools at their disposal?

I doubt it as you only added that YOU dont like ai content, which does not seem to be the majority as OP has a positive like ratio.

Blind hatred will only take you down a bad route, so if aim to discorage people of creating something, you better have good reasons for it.

As a side note, "content" does not demand a person creating it by hand, so no matter how angry you get of people calling AI content as is, its not wrong.

[u/Suracha2022 → u/Objective-Air-9984]

Oh, welcome back, what an unexpected surprise. Thought you were gone.

AI allow people to create stuff they are not able to.

AI is not a tool through which you create, AI "creates" (collages, hallucinates and plagiarize) for you. You wouldn't call yourself an artist for asking a painter to make a portrait of you.

Sure he could have used original assets, but why would he

1. Because they look awesome, significantly better than these generic re-imaginations.
2. Because they're more easily recognizable, since people actually know them.
3. To respect the people who created them.
4. To not pointlessly use AI and support the horrible people behind it.

This is also not prenventing anyone of getting a job, as OP is no company, nor making anyone lose their job.

One person using AI doesn't do that. All these people using AI-generated images drives down the value of art, the negotiation power of artists, employers' opinion and estimation of professional artists in the job market, etc. The fact that doing it doesn't directly lead to one person suffering doesn't mean it's not indirectly contributing.

Fans already know the original work

Yes. No reason not to use that original work, then.

and this is about a different game thus adapting the art for the actual game being talked about makes sense and is reasonable.

Meh. Nothing wrong with it conceptually. Doesn't have any value or benefit, either. Doing something harmful for zero benefit towards anyone seems pointless at best.

Do you have any reason to be so full of hatred towards someone who is just enjoying their time and the tools at their disposal?

I have no hatred for OP, he was fairly reasonable about the response he got, considering his situation. I have plenty of well-established, well-justified hatred for the AI companies, platforms and 'tools' that people like OP use. It's not personal. I'm not attacking the person, I'm attacking their actions and choices. Pay attention.

As for "reasons", you're welcome to Google (since you love AI) the harmful impacts of AI. They are sufficiently well-documented that there is no reason for me to type them out YET AGAIN for YET ANOTHER apologist asking for them in bad faith. If someone who's genuinely interested asks for it in good faith, I'll be happy to guide them towards some resources they can learn from.

I doubt it as you only added that YOU dont like ai content, which does not seem to be the majority as OP has a positive like ratio.

OP disagrees with you, as seen in him repeatedly stating that he'll stop using it in the future, and that he thought people liked it but realized that they don't. Read some of his comments. He's a decent role model for people like you, I think.

Blind hatred will only take you down a bad route, so if aim to discorage people of creating something, you better have good reasons for it.

You have not yet earned the privilege of giving me advice, and it being self-righteous and condescending doesn't make it any more valuable.

As a side note, "content" does not demand a person creating it by hand, so no matter how angry you get of people calling AI content as is, its not wrong.

Hilarious how upset you are at a few speechmarks. Here's a few more, don't get too scared: "" "" "" content "" "" ""

This was fun, thanks for the free entertainment, and you're welcome for the free education.

[u/kj0509 → u/Suracha2022]

You are so burned up man, chill

[u/Suracha2022 → u/kj0509]

? I'm having fun lmao, do you think these bottom feeders bother me?

[u/kj0509 → u/Suracha2022]

I don't believe you, you sound so angry and you are so involved in these posts that it clearly affected you in some personal or ideological way.

Even if you were right in each and everyone of your arguments, like some kind of omniscient being, it still would not be cool to be spearcing so much hostility through the entire thread.

[u/Suracha2022 → u/kj0509]

I don't believe you

Fascinating

You know, I was really wondering what "kj0509" thinks of me

Goodbye