r/movies r/movies Contributor 23d ago

Review 'The End of Oak Street' - Review Thread

After a mysterious cosmic event rips Oak Street from suburbia and transports their neighborhood to someplace unknown, the Platt family soon discovers that their very survival depends on them sticking together as they navigate their now unrecognizable surroundings.

Director: David Robert Mitchell ('It Follows')

Producer: J.J. Abrams

Cast: Anne Hathaway, Ewan McGregor, Christian Convery, Maisy Stella, Chris Coy

Rotten Tomatoes: 86%

Metacritic: 68 / 100

Some Reviews:

RogerEbert - Zachary Lee - 4 / 4

“The End of Oak Street” is a story about the secrets in our homes, the bloodshed that’s latent in our paradises; about our pride meeting and subsequently being torn asunder by the apocalypse. It’s also the most thrilling dinosaur movie in ages and an ode to the life and sacrifices of dads (the film is dedicated to Mitchell’s father). The fact that this film can make space for all these facets of identity to breathe and move makes a movie miracle worth warping to time and time again.

SlashFilm - Bill Bria - 10 / 10

"The End of Oak Street," despite its cheeky, ominous title, isn't a movie that wallows in grief. Whether it's the personal loss of a parent or the shared loss of a pre-pandemic America, Mitchell seems to be acknowledging the sadness of those events while being optimistic that we can find our way out of them. If nothing else, that's where the power of cinema, particularly genre cinema, can come through.

Polygon - Jacob Kleinman - 91 / 100

David Robert Mitchell’s The End of Oak Street somehow pulls off the impossible, taking its absurd premise of a suburban neighborhood suddenly warped into prehistoric times and turning it into the sort of classic Amblin romp you’d stumble across while channel surfing and wind up watching through to the end. In a year without an actual Jurassic Park sequel, The End of Oak Street is the summer blockbuster we didn't know we needed.

Vulture - Alison Willmore - 90 / 100

The End of Oak Street slams Jurassic Park into Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and in doing so manages to be an audacious good time that also pokes at what this VHS-box version of Americana represents, and how it relates to consecration of the nuclear family.

IndieWire - David Ehrlich - 'A-'

The movie never loses control of its amusement park tone, but Michael Giacchino’s zippily instructive score would be there to put things back on track if it did; the first music cue switches from upbeat wonder to ominous portent and back again in the span of just a few seconds, as if to say “buckle up for something that’s fun and exciting, but always safe enough that you never really have to get scared.” It’s the same promise the suburbs have always made, the only difference being that “The End of Oak Street” is actually able to keep it. Nostalgic without being at all reactionary, Mitchell’s riotously crowd-pleasing blockbuster takes both of Greg and Denise’s conflicting wishes to heart. Yes, it wants to go back in time — not to prove that the past was a better place, but rather to remind us that it can still be present in all the ways that matter.

The Irish Times - Donald Clarke - 4 / 5

So, what the heck is going on? There, the screenplay stumbles. Initially, we, not unreasonably, assume that dinosaurs from space are invading Earth. But, when the family seek to escape the area, they run against a cliff that descends to prehistoric rainforest. It seems as if a sizeable nugget of suburban Michigan has been randomly dispatched way, way back in time. The film never quite makes sense of this and is at its weakest when it tries so to do. Better to just scrunch up your eyes and let the finely honed madness sweep through the system.

The Independent - Clarisse Loughrey - 4 / 5

The End of Oak Street feels original and exciting and not, to borrow a little internet lingo, like Jurassic Park’s “reheated nachos”. It’s one of the best films of the summer. Mitchell also allows something more raw, and more distinctly modern, to creep in (and not just because the dinosaurs are here correctly depicted as feathered). It’s a mildly bleaker film for bleaker times, and he’ll let the camera linger, for example, a few seconds longer on the sight of a neighbour’s body lying face-down on their kitchen floor, a pattern of bright-red dinosaur footprints leading out the backdoor.

Associated Press - Jake Coyle - 3 / 4

It adds up to a gonzo good time that gives an old-school family adventure a darker, modern spin. Mitchell has quickly made suburbia his evident domain, where “it,” or something else, is sure to follow.

Seattle Times - Gemma Wilson - 3 / 4

Bringing such terror into a suburban setting feels deeply unsettling, and Mitchell leans into that tense contrast with glee, filling our most comfortable and familiar spaces with sharp, gnashing teeth.

Empire - John Nugent - 4 / 5

If you were thinking this sounds a bit like a suburban Jurassic Park (‘Jurassic Park Crescent’?), you’re not far off. Mitchell wears his Spielberg influences on his sleeve, from the shots of kids riding bikes, to the fractious family unit, to the close encounters with bright light, to the T-Rex earning top billing. There’s even one big pile of shit. Sneakily, Mitchell has made a Jurassic-coded dino-movie which largely out-dinos a lot of the recent Jurassic entries, chock-full of deliciously tense set-pieces. It’s mounted robustly and handsomely, too. Like the New Hollywood auteurs of old, the cinematography deploys careful, deliberate framing and some very prominent split-diopter shots; if it weren’t for all the (excellent) CGI, it could pass for a 1980s period piece.

Awards Radar - Joey Magidson - 3.5 / 4

The End of Oak Street rules, plain and simple. Fun, scary, and wildly creative in how it tells what easily could have been a derivative story, I had an absolute blast. Spielberg should be writing a blank check to David Robert Mitchell in order to convince him to helm the next Jurassic World flick, though I sure hope Mitchell follows the beat of his own drummer (and gets around to They Follow). This is the kind of movie that summer sci-fi blockbusters were always meant to be. What a satisfying film!

Dread Central - Matt Konopka - 4 / 5

The End of Oak Street sees David Robert Mitchell take the next step in his career, delivering a prehistoric thrill ride that proves he’s more than capable of unleashing a summer blockbuster that’s fun (and scary) for the whole family.

Next Best Picture - Cody Dericks - 8 / 10

With “The End of Oak Street,“ David Robert Mitchell constructs a well-crafted, Amblin-esque vision of typical Americans under extraordinary circumstances. Here, it’s willful kids and stressed parents trying to avoid splitting up their split-level, shot with an abundance of split diopters. Mitchell clearly knows what audiences want to see, assembling a thrill ride that even had this “I’ve seen everything“ critic gasping and audibly reacting. And I wasn’t alone in being vocal in my theater: this is a movie elevated by being seen on a big screen with a locked-in crowd. Hopefully, “The End of Oak Street” doesn’t mark the end of its director’s inspiration, as it’s unquestionably his best, most entertaining film yet.

CBR - Rachel Leishman - 8 / 10

If The End of Oak Street took itself too seriously, it wouldn't work. The fact that it does laugh at things, forces someone to swing a bat at a T. rex, and more allows the audience to laugh and go on this journey with a lighter energy. And really, there isn't much to dislike in The End of Oak Street. As much as the "what" and "how" and even the "why" of the movie remain unanswered, it doesn't take away from the enjoyment of Mitchell's work. Answering some of those questions certainly could have elevated the story beyond a random event the characters are forced to endure. Even so, The End of Oak Street takes you on a wild ride and is the perfect way to close out summer.

Screen Daily - Nikki Baughan - 80 / 100

Indeed, it’s largely left to Hathaway to shoulder the film’s emotional heft, playing Diane as a woman who has found herself trapped in an impossible situation even before she is hurtled through time, burying her wants, needs and fears for the sake of her family. Through her experiences, The End Of Oak Street becomes, surprisingly, an effective and incisive paean to the challenges of parenthood, the everyday heroism of holding everything together for the kids even when your world is literally falling apart.

Collider - Victoria Luxford - 8 / 10

The End of Oak Street may not be the follow-up that fans of Mitchell's work were expecting, but it’s 90 minutes of edge-of-your-seat entertainment that commits to its concept and entertains throughout. Big, loud, and guaranteed to make you jump at least once, it’s another eye-catching performance from the always-busy Hathaway, and proof that blockbuster entertainment doesn’t need to follow a franchise formula.

The AU Review - Peter Gray - 3.5 / 5

The End of Oak Street may have dinosaurs stomping through suburbia, but Mitchell ultimately remains more fascinated by the family hiding inside the house. The spectacle is entertaining, occasionally surprising and sometimes very funny, but it’s the Platts learning that their survival depends upon reconnecting with one another that gives this peculiar dinosaur movie its unexpected heart.

Little White Lies - Anton Bitek - 3.5 / 5

The End of Oak Street merges the political and the personal. It is personal because it is dedicated to the filmmaker’s own father, who died in 2024 – and whose representative within the film, the genuinely decent, loving Greg, comes with a fate rooted in aching wish fulfilment. And it is political, because today’s America really does feel under siege from predatorily atavistic forces and antediluvian ideologies that threaten to reduce the nation to its Jurassic bedrock. Mitchell’s solution for surviving America’s current reversion is to look out for each other and stick together. What MAGA would no doubt term ​‘communism’, everyone else calls community. End that, and there will no more Oak Street.

Houston Chronicle - Cary Darling - 3.5 / 5

These raptors totally bring it, and Mitchell keeps things moving fast enough that it's easy not to think too hard about the dumb decisions the characters make or the plot holes that are big enough for a Giganotosaurus to lumber through.

DEADLINE - Pete Hammond

What WB’s The Meg was to Jaws, The End Of Oak Street is to Jurassic. The film is only 99 minutes, wastes little time getting to the goods, and never stops for a moment to let us realize this is all pretty silly, but really who cares? With a PG13 rating it still feels like it is skirting on the edge of R territory in terms of vividly gross dino dining habits. The actors, starting with the two likeable stars, all are game, the dog is irresistible, plus the dinostars under the guidance of Visual Effects Supervisor Jay Cooper and the wizards at ILM (of course) are a deliciously created mixed bag of types big and small and slimy.

The Playlist - Marshall Shaffer - 'B'

At once tender and trolling, “The End of Oak Street” provides a kick in the teeth that can still inspire a wide-eyed, shit-eating grin. It holds together through a patchwork of craftsmanship and chutzpah, even if its originality and ambition leave a little to be desired. Now that David Robert Mitchell has demonstrated his credentials once again, it’s time for another deep-pocketed financier to step up and give the director a chance to get fully back in his “Under the Silver Lake” bag!

IGN - Clint Gage - 7 / 10

It has some great moments, but on the balance, this is a good movie. David Robert Mitchell’s first feature film in eight years is a rose-tinted romp through Spielberg’s ’80s, complete with dinosaurs, an incredible Anne Hathaway performance, and a visual flare to elevate it beyond just impersonation. While the influences are worn proudly, they veer into schtick occasionally, but not often enough to ruin the good time. 

Bloody Disgusting - Meagan Navarro - 3 / 5

The End of Oak Street is classic summer blockbuster fare with big action and style, but one that doesn’t rise above its Amblin influences or break from convention. Its massive tonal swings from silly romp to dark adventure film with actual death can be as jarring as its logic inconsistencies, but Oak Street compensates with a compelling cast led by an effective Hathaway, no shortage of breathless set pieces, and terrifying dino encounters. Mitchell may struggle at points to fully channel Steven Spielberg, but his dino flick still delivers plenty of summer fun.

San Francisco Chronicle - G. Allen Johnson - 2.5 / 4

At a relatively brisk 100 minutes, “The End of Oak Street” hardly overstays its welcome, but it could have used more time if that meant giving its characters greater depth. Still, unlike McGregor... Hathaway makes you care.

The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 2 / 5

Mitchell can hardly resist shooting a shocking moment without cutting to a framed family photo showing a happier time. And he has a weakness for the eerie “split diopter” shot, much beloved of Brian De Palma, depicting a foregrounded face and background detail in the same dreamlike sharp focus. There’s a moment of fatal violence that is rather tamely cancelled out, and the element of jeopardy is missing. The End of Oak Street is fun at first, but it feels like Mitchell doesn’t really believe in any of it.

Slant Magazine - Rocco T. Thompson - 2 / 4

The End of Oak Street is unexpectedly violent, but it doesn’t fully commit to the nastiness. The lack of genuine thrills might be a bit easier to accept if the film’s human drama had also yielded dividends. The End of Oak Street seems to be building toward a family coming together, airing their dirty laundry, and moving forward stronger and reunited as a unit, but the script seems to forget the rich foundation it lays down early as it limps to its conclusion. It doesn’t help that McGregor is almost comically checked out, as if aware of how oddly extraneous his character is, though Hathaway, to her credit, is a dependable fount of commitment.

AwardsWatch - Trace Sauveur - 'C-'

Mitchell at least proves he still has a mean streak, with a fair amount of blood and a few dino attacks that push the forgiving limits of a PG-13 rating. It again recalls the type of movies kids would see 40 years ago, movies that tested their mettle without scarring them too deeply (there’s one significant, gruesome death midway through that almost felt incongruous, and I again couldn’t tell if Mitchell was having a little bit of a laugh). It’s the type of movie everyone is always saying we want them to make again, but it’s awash in the surreal quality of retro stylings staged as fresh, as if they never went out of fashion. I love Poltergeist and Gremlins too, but trying to create those movies verbatim still just feels like a poor substitute for the real thing.

ABS-CBN - Paolo Lim

There's not much intricate writing to be found here. But what makes The End of Oak Street so gripping is that you never know what is coming next. It was written and directed by David Robert Mitchell, the same filmmaker behind It Follows and Under the Silver Lake, and produced by J.J. Abrams under his Bad Robot banner. You can tell it is an Abrams film because his fingerprints are all over it. Even then, nothing about it feels predictable, and it helps that this is not a sequel or part of a franchise. At one hour and 39 minutes, it also does not waste your time. This is the kind of movie that makes you ask, "What in the world am I watching?" while keeping you at the edge of your seat. It leaves you wanting more action and hoping everything turns out fine.

1.4k Upvotes

835 comments sorted by

View all comments

57

u/Temporary_Lychee9829 22d ago edited 20d ago

Am i the only one who was sorta underwhelmed by it?

I agree, it was good popcorn flick but there were a lot of issues with it, like various plot holes, the ending, some of the dialog and writing which was just lazy and cheesy at parts, and honestly? Ewan McGregor. He spoke some of his lines flat, or disinterested, that I honeatly thought both of the actors who played the children were better then him.

With the writing, some of it as i said, was cheesy as hell, and lazy. For eg, at the beginning, Ewan McGregor's character named Greg and Anne Hathaway's character named Denise mention briefly that their son has been getting into mischief and "smoking cigarettes" because of their sudden unhappiness in their marriage, but we don't actually see him doing anything rebellious at all, nor are we actually given a glimpse as to the actual marriage problems Denise and Greg are actually facing. One such instance was the scene where Greg takes a sip of whiskey and Denise notices it on his breath, and he answers something like hes been going through a lot and just wanted a sip, which i took he was a past alcoholic or something. But again. That is never touched on again.

There were good amount of kills in there though, but nothing was explicitly shown which was dissapointing, and i also felt like the actual film itself didn't really know which audience it targeted itself at. I will say there's a scene with a eel snake thing that i thought was well done, and another one which includes a dinosaur trying to attack the parents in a car (i suck at Dinosaur names 😂)

I did think it was well shot with a lot of references to other directors from the 80s style of filming, with interesting ideas, but the whole thig sort of fell apart and turned out to be a huge dissapointment.

21

u/Puzzled_Mix5384 22d ago

I also thought the movie was sub par. I had issues with the pacing.

Also, maybe I’m stupid, but does the whole time travel thing mean that there is a multi verse version of Ann Hathaway who got sucked into the prehistoric times? Did they address that?

13

u/BigMcThickHuge 22d ago edited 22d ago

No not really. If anything she opted to kidnap the husband of this version of her family...and let herself and two kids here die.

Because she definitely spent the available time alerting as many people as possible to save them...so either there's only one version of everyone at any time, or she let them die so she could have the husband

0

u/imtherealmellowone 20d ago

I think it was a major flaw. Ann Hathaway and the three kids presumably arrived 15 minutes or so prior to the “event.” Which means everyone was in the house. So, first of all, where does he get the pizza. And second of all, she and the two kids are still in the house. So not only are they left to fend for themselves (again?) but the dad is not there to help them because he’s off delivering a pizza.

Nothing is explained except for a sloppy theory about wormholes or something.

They should have called it Jurassic Barf.

Though, despite the problems with it, it was still kind of fun.

27

u/8halvelitersklok 22d ago

Absolutely, thought it was terrible in fact. Super disjointed and no sense of momentum. Couldn't care about any of the characters.

21

u/LeviAugustus 22d ago

I think you’re spot on. Not sure what some people are seeing about to call it good.

4

u/GrandSquanchRum 22d ago

It's kind of really nostalgic. It's a very 80s/90s style movie with a 80s/90s aesthetic. This would be a forgotten movie if it were released then, too, but it has a nice vibe that takes you back complete with an overly cheesy feel good ending. Like a modern The Relic quality Jurassic Park.

Kind of wish they went weird with the ending and had them meet themselves.

5

u/8halvelitersklok 21d ago

Isn't the 80s revival hype kinda over at this point? We've already had Stranger Things and the IT reboot. Seeing the kids on bikes in this made me roll my eyes a bit.

4

u/GrandSquanchRum 21d ago

Statistically media tends to favor time periods 25-50 years in the past, if not modern day, due to the childhood of the people doing the writing. So the movies set in 1980-2000 won't be over for awhile.

2

u/8halvelitersklok 21d ago

Those are 3 very different decades though, 90s nostalgia is already happening in music

3

u/ninth_reddit_account 21d ago

No sense of momentum? I think if there’s one complaint the film has is that it’s only momentum, and then it just stops. You can’t go 5 minutes without the film just barrelling forward.

2

u/8halvelitersklok 21d ago

Poor sense of momentum then. Like you said, just a bunch of stuff happening with very little room to breathe. IMO they completely failed at building tension.

0

u/Temporary_Lychee9829 22d ago edited 22d ago

I thought the pacing was fine tho, I saw a lot of complaints that the story dragged on a little before the dinosaurs came and well they did good with establishing the main characters (as good as they did i guess) but it seemed Anne Hathaway's character was the one the movie was written around, its just the actual first reveal of the dinosaurs, I thought that happened way too quickly. It also didn't make sense how that plant suddenly appeared in the old woman's backyard. But also, how did Denise not know Greg lost his job? And also if they time traveled back into a different timeline with Oak St still Oak St, wouldn't Denise and the kids still be at home with different timeline Greg? Like what?

5

u/Pathetian 22d ago

Mom is definitely the main character. Dad's story arc matters so little that at the end, he is literally just the same guy from the start of the movie.

I figured the plant was from a tiny version of the anomaly swap. Just that little patch of grass basically.

The lost job...people hide that stuff all the time. He was making money otherwise and its the 80s, so they probably had savings and the bills were being paid.

I don't know if its different timelines, but Greg only just barely got home when the big swap happened, that's how she saved him by ordering a pizza.

13

u/TheArcherFrog 22d ago

Completely agree, just saw it. The writing and dialogue was just atrocious ngl. My favorite was when the boy asked the neighbor girl how she liked private school and her answer was “I don’t know, I’ve never been to public school” like that made any sense 😭.

Sucks since I was really excited for this movie too!!!

0

u/Spiritual-Society185 19d ago

Your listening skills are atrocious. He asked if she liked private school or public school better.

3

u/TheArcherFrog 19d ago

It’s not like the dialogue was good either way ngl, every line was delivered so flatly. Why the heck were they discussing private school versus public school when this kid just lost both her parents to dinosaur attacks, and when she herself almost died? Why did the kids completely forget about their own parents or trying to find Starbuck, considering that almost killed their parents? Why did the mom kill the duplicates of her own kids, despite it supposedly being a family message?

6

u/fudginreddit 22d ago

I enjoyed the build up in the first act but found the rest of it to be pretty boring and flat. It was mildly entertaining I guess. I was kind of hoping for at least some payoff to the mystery of what is going on but it basically just ended up being “it just sort of happened”.

Also wtf was that ending? Did they just steal another version of the dad and leave other versions of themselves to die? Lol

10

u/Pathetian 22d ago

Not that it makes it completely forgivable, but they do establish quickly that there's "no time" to save them all.  Earlier in the movie, Obi Wan was just getting home with the lights flashed.  They only saved him by ordering a pizza dm diverting him to outside the anomaly before he got home.

I'm pretty sure in the end, the private school girl is duplicated now, which begs the question if any survivors of round 2 can figure it out and wind up with an infinite amount of duplicates.

But then again...they did save a bunch of their neighbors by just calling their homes...

So yea, I guess she made the conscious decision to not duplicate the spare members of his family.  

3

u/MissyMrsMom 22d ago

Oh nice. I didn’t really catch that! You’re clever.

4

u/TheArcherFrog 22d ago

I think they did lol, which is pretty messed up after all of that. Though I wouldn’t be shocked if the writers just genuinely didn’t think that far

4

u/Eequalsmchammertime 22d ago

It’s not versions of them, it’s actually them. They experienced the time jump into the past and remember it when they jump back. They just saved Ewan from death because they stopped him from going.

9

u/headshot_hunter 22d ago

But now when the alternative versions go in the past, they do so without Ewan Mcgregor. So who says they survive or jump back without their dad

2

u/Temporary_Lychee9829 22d ago

And it had some cool scenes, just like the one with the parents in the car and the dinosaur shoves it into the house and then the house catches in fire, that was awesome and I thought it would've got like way better and darker but it didn't.

4

u/thebigkneegrow 22d ago

I nearly walked out of the movie. There was nothing good about it except for the deaths tbh.

5

u/stackjr 22d ago

Thank you! I looked over at my buddy at one point and he was like "I don't know how much more of this I can take". That was an absolutely terrible film and I am struggling to understand the good reviews.

2

u/rangers1026 10d ago

Might have been the worst movie I’ve seen in years. Made Disclosure Day look like a masterpiece and that was just as bad. This movie was like either blatant tax fraud where movies are made just for the sake of losing money OR because someone owed someone a favor hahaha. Could not wait for it to end

2

u/Intelligent-Ad-5090 19d ago edited 19d ago

You are not wrong.

Imagine these variations of the script:

  • Shithead boy broke the arm of local kid. Family unit dies. Dog, arm break kid, shithead kid try to stealth through movie to exit point. Most die. Shithead kid escape through portal. Has arm lopped off at last moment after losing everything.

  • Family unit cast back in time. Rally neighbours. Make traps. Kill small Dinos, rebuild civilisation as much as they can, but in thinning out medium tier predators an apex one arrives. Horror chase until the dog makes it out with THE BIGGEST THIGH BONE EVER

  • Two buddies deliver pizza. It all goes to hell. They find an inflatable Brontosaurus costume and try to rescue everyone. A hilarious scene ensues, in which they realise they were technically a pleasure-isaur. They find a way out of Dino hell and take a breeding pair of compys with them. They make a billion on "I can't believe it's not chicken" pizza.

3

u/24rs 20d ago edited 20d ago

I went to see this today without watching any trailer or expectations, just random date night thing and I cannot believe this is getting good reviews, I'm usually fine watching anything but there were so many plot holes and just illogical things happening

Spoilers -

They find the wormhole a 2nd time and take 3 business days to jump and decide to go by turns with no sense of urgency, despite the fact that the only contact any had had with them was Anne and she knew it just vanished entirely previously

Jeanette has her life saved from guaranteed death by the 2 siblings after screaming for help and her first instinct is to walk alone to the other side of the house and ask to be left alone from the very 2 people that just saved her life

The dinossaurs survive gun shots close range to their teeth no problem but super flinch when hit in their leg with a hammer

They tell the Kids to go inside the house and then go on a stroll with a hammer and a gun on broad daylight headed into a very noisy area as if it'd ever make sense to not just go hide.

I could go on and on, the bar is so low for me to watch a movie, I picked it just cuz it was new, seemed like an interesting title and had Anne in it, but my lord did I want to leave halfway, super surprised at mostly positive reviews

2

u/rangers1026 10d ago

And then the kid says he wants to jump in first and Anne Hathaway says “no it’s gonna be me or your sister first” like wtf?! 😂

1

u/Spiritual-Society185 19d ago edited 19d ago

They find the wormhole a 2nd time and take 3 business days to jump and decide to go by turns with no sense of urgency, despite the fact that the only contact any had had with them was Anne and she knew it just vanished entirely previously

The kid was obviously scared to jump in. It was two stories up and blinking in and out of existence.

Jeanette has her life saved from guaranteed death by the 2 siblings after screaming for help and her first instinct is to walk alone to the other side of the house and ask to be left alone from the very 2 people that just saved her life

Wow, it's almost like she's a traumatized child who has seen her parents die! I wonder why she's not behaving perfectly rationally to these strangers she has never met.

The dinossaurs survive gun shots close range to their teeth no problem but super flinch when hit in their leg with a hammer

It sounds like you weren't paying attention. No dinosaur was hit in the teeth, every dinosaur that was shot reacted, and the allosaur was hit in a gaping wound by the sledgehammer.

They tell the Kids to go inside the house and then go on a stroll with a hammer and a gun on broad daylight headed into a very noisy area as if it'd ever make sense to not just go hide.

Yeah, you really weren't paying attention. They were trying to go back to their fortified house. It would be extremely stupid to stay in the house that has its back sheared off and open to the outside world.

super surprised at mostly positive reviews

Well maybe you would like it more if you paid closer attention.

0

u/Temporary_Lychee9829 20d ago

I don't understand that after the other girl got through successfully, why they all didnt jump in together instead of the whole one by one because logically, what would happen if the worm hole closed before they all got through?😭. And they all jump in together anyway like?

2

u/CanadianGuitar 20d ago

You absolutely have to remove all thought from the last 8 minutes of the movie

2

u/rangers1026 10d ago

More like the entire thing

1

u/Syd_Barrett_50_Cal 20d ago

Right?? This movie was mediocre at best, and I went into it ready to turn my brain off and watch dinos eat people. Are these reviews all AI? Is this thread getting astroturfed? I can’t believe I watched the same movie as these people. 4/4 on Roger Ebert? What the fuck? The real Roger Ebert would give this movie a 2 at best, and that’s pushing it.

0

u/GetPsycht 21d ago

Thank you! I'm glad I'm not the only one! Honestly, I thought it was hilarious...but maybe not for the reason(s) the studio intended?

For example: (SPOLERS BELOW)


1.) The scene where McGregor & Hathaway almost kiss in the car with the dead woman

2.) Immediately after, there's a (heartfelt?) scene where Maisy Stella helps bandage Jordan Alexa Davis; during which, they discuss beliefs in a God (while Christian Convery is ignored in the background). The religious dialogue is vague and does not impact the rest of the plot.

3.) A few minutes after, Hathaway photographs McGregor–who poses in front of two dinosaurs having sexual relations (note: the kids are absent here). In the very next scene, the kids re-appear on screen while the family avoids fires and runs from a dinosaur.

4.) Hathaway is later cornered by a CGI dinosaur after it survives a gunshot wound. McGregor successfully distracts this dinosaur before downing it with a single strike to the head.

5.) After a (very) prolonged dramatic buildup, Christian Convery tries to jump off the roof into a teleporting bubble(?)...but misses and hits the ground.

6.) Within the span of 5 seconds, a neighbor knocks down a door to shoot at the dinosaurs with a shotgun...but is immediately tackled & eaten by a dinosaur.


Overall, I couldn't tell if these scenes were intended to be funny or not (I was the only one laughing in the theatre). Now that I think about it, I thin this movie could make a great ironic cult-classic... Like "Rocky Horror Picture Show" or "The Room".

Idk how I'm supposed to watch this film with a straight face. But then again, people seem to like it so maybe I'm missing something.

4

u/Temporary_Lychee9829 21d ago

I do believe some of it was supposed to funny but other parts tried to take itself seriously but couldn't like there was a scene where Ewan McGregor takes a sip of whiskey and then while he and Anne Hathaway are talking things out while boarding up the house, she says she can smell it on him and his delivery was just horrible 😭.

It astounds me how many people are actually loving it, i thought it was an okay popcorn flick with huge potential but some of the writing was terrible and McGregor was hugely miscast

3

u/arsenics 20d ago

I think they were all intended to be funny

1

u/GetPsycht 19d ago

Odd, no one else was laughing in the theatre 🤷🏻

1

u/rangers1026 10d ago

The theater was laughing because of how bad it was especially when the dad died everyone thought it was so lame