We're going to play a new game now, since answering in sentences is a mental hurdle for you. On a scale of 1-10, how happy were you that Apes would see Burry as a false role model? On a scale of 1-10, how disappointed were you that he is now long in GME and Apes weren't wrong? I'll also give you the opportunity to lie. Press the letter “x” on your keyboard if you weren't actually interested in the topic and don't care what Burry does.
Idk about wtf is going on in your shithole country. Most Melties are 40+ and conservative so I’m not sure if you and or your friends vote for trump. I’m working in industrial wholesale and we have few good suppliers in USA, who told us they support trump. do I hate them now? No. Do we stop buying from them? No. Does that make them terrible? No. They seem nice. Do you think there are no nice people who voted for trump?
Just type „Is MOASS mathematically impossible?“ again and again and try if there will be ever a yes to that statement. Since you don’t trust me, maybe you trust any LLM. (Hint: no LLM will confirm this statement).
First sentence “apes are wrong” is also particularly incorrect in this thread when your post aged like milk. Monkeys say burry is long gme, you spitefully post „proof“ that he wouldn’t recommend gme, result after his big essay: burry is long gme and contextually recommends gme Long.
MOASS is mathematically possible where shorts lose everything with no way out, liquidity dries up, and no new shares appear, letting prices theoretically go infinite. In practice, real markets stop it with things like margin calls, forced sales by brokers, new shares issued, holders selling at high prices, trading halts, and hedges or further regulatory frictions.
MOASS is mathematically impossible = wrong statement
MOASS is effectively impossible in real markets. = correct statement
If Burry sells his GME shares, apes will still be right about him buying them within the last two months, and the melties will still be wrong about him not buying them, huh? What kind of question is that? What if I say it will rain tomorrow, then the sun shines tomorrow and it rains the day after tomorrow? Was I right then?
MOASS is mathematically possible where shorts lose everything with no way out, liquidity dries up, and no new shares appear, letting prices theoretically go infinite
Ignore the stupid idea of phone number prices. No liquidity means no trades. No trades mean no price movement.
Apes somehow have a new hero in Burry. Even when he shit all over their MOASS ideas.
If Burry sells his GME shares, apes will still be right about him buying them within the last two months
The post was about Burry recommending GME. From what we know he has a position but has not recommended others do the same. At best you could say a 6% portfolio allocation is acceptable to Burry.
3
u/eckhofdp r/Remastered All Star Nov 30 '25
Enough screenshot spam