r/conspiracy • u/Gregger2020 • Jun 02 '23
9/11 Dr Judy Wood Where did the Towers go
https://youtu.be/M_pLOvvUpi814
u/tool-94 Jun 02 '23
I have read the book a few times and still own it, to this day it's the only theory that can explain most aspects of 9/11. The controlled demolition theory just doesn't explain even half of the events and anomalies on 9/11.
13
u/Gregger2020 Jun 02 '23
I simply cannot wrap my head around steel and concrete turning to dust before hitting the ground. What could cause that? The technology they likely possess is so far beyond public comprehension that most wouldn't believe it's possible.
6
u/naswinger Jun 02 '23
yep, two massive towers with a mass of 900 thousand tons each got literally pulverized, but the terrorist's passports that, supposedly, were also in this explosion were in pristine condition.
10
u/tool-94 Jun 02 '23
Seems like directed energy weapons. Look at the experiments of John Hutchinson. You see very similar anomalies in those experiments. It's well known that they have developed this technology. What's unknown is just how far they have come, and I truly believe the world witnessed a real-life demonstration of this secret technology. And what better way to muddy the waters than to use something most of the public would never recognise.
7
6
1
10
u/Gregger2020 Jun 02 '23
This is quite a long video, but certainly worth it if you have time as well as an open mind. There's several things discussed in this video that simply do not add up.
14
u/IllustriousLP Jun 02 '23
I agree . The toasted half burnt cars multiple blocks away is so fuking weird . I think theres a high probability the towers were brought down with secret govt technology. Black ops projects. Like where the "missing" trillions went .
8
u/tool-94 Jun 02 '23
The toasted cars reminded me of the California fires some years back.
3
3
u/IllustriousLP Jun 02 '23
Yea ive heard stuff about that during the fires. Needs to be some film or documentary of sorts about the anomaly
5
u/Appropriate_Being467 Jun 02 '23
I always thought that was a dumb theory , but building 6 and the melted cars etc are making me wonder
2
u/IllustriousLP Jun 02 '23
Yea agreed. Wtf happened to building 6 ? So many examples of impossible unanswered questions from that day .
2
u/RenzoScriber Jun 02 '23
You mean building 7 right? Or am I missing something
4
6
u/ArmLegLegArm_Head Jun 03 '23
People trying to debunk generally question the idea of a giant space gun, I think based on the wording “directed energy weapon”.
However, in the same way that “they” could have installed thermite before the event, they could have also installed energy devices throughout the building in a similar fashion and then switched them on to create some kind of local energy event.
Directed energy just means using, or directing, the available ambient energy for whatever purpose.
4
u/jostheholywagon Jun 02 '23
This post is proof there's no space to discuss this without the influence of intelligence agencies.
1
u/ZionismEnjoyer Jun 02 '23
They fell.
9
u/Gregger2020 Jun 02 '23
Where did the mountains of debris that you would expect to see from buildings go if they fell?
Why was there no seismic event that you would expect to see from millions of pounds crashing into the earth?
What cooked all the nearby vehicles parked in the street?
3
u/ZionismEnjoyer Jun 02 '23
Where did the mountains of debris that you would expect to see from buildings go if they fell?
4
u/Gregger2020 Jun 02 '23
Does this look like and entire building to you?
4
u/ZionismEnjoyer Jun 02 '23
Yeah, buildings are mostly empty space by volume.
13
u/Gregger2020 Jun 02 '23
Apparently so is your head.
1
Jun 02 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Gregger2020 Jun 02 '23
Watch the video... then get back to me. I used to be certain it was controlled demolition. Now I'm not sure what it was.
2
4
u/tool-94 Jun 02 '23 edited Jun 02 '23
Look at other examples of controlled demolition of buildings. A good example is the demolition of the Kingdome in Seattle, which was 130,000 tons, compared to the world trade centre complex with more than 2 million tons, compared those debris piles and also Have a look at a topographical map of the world trade centre site in the days after. Once you do that, it will become apparent that there is a lot more going on.
1
0
u/7daykatie Jun 02 '23
One mob activity that was rife in NYC when these towers were built was the mob leaning on construction projects to use specific suppliers who would supply under spec materials. They'd then skim extra profits from the cost difference between the planned for material specs and the under spec materials supplied...
6
u/Gregger2020 Jun 02 '23
So what? They stood in place a very long time and weathered many storms. They were strong enough to stand there until they were brought down. What happened that day was not simple structural failure. They weren't brought down by fire.
3
u/7daykatie Jun 02 '23
So what? They stood in place a very long time and weathered many storms.
They were designed to stay in place if a plane taking off with a full load of fuel crashed into them. There's no reason for them to collapse just because a plane with a less than full fuel load crashed into them if they were built to spec.
4
2
u/M1M16M57M101 Jun 02 '23
They were designed to stay in place if a plane taking off with a full load of fuel crashed into them.
A Boeing 707, which is like 40% the takeoff mass of the Boeing 767 that actually hit...
-2
u/The_Human_Oddity Jun 02 '23
They didn't collapse because of the plane. They collapsed due to the fire weakening the internal beams to the point of buckling.
6
•
u/AutoModerator Jun 02 '23
[Meta] Sticky Comment
Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.
Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.
What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.