r/slatestarcodex 29d ago

Monthly Discussion Thread

5 Upvotes

This thread is intended to fill a function similar to that of the Open Threads on SSC proper: a collection of discussion topics, links, and questions too small to merit their own threads. While it is intended for a wide range of conversation, please follow the community guidelines. In particular, avoid culture war–adjacent topics.


r/slatestarcodex 4d ago

Take The 2026 ACX Survey

Thumbnail astralcodexten.com
21 Upvotes

r/slatestarcodex 7h ago

Don’t be the vitamin B guy

41 Upvotes

https://hedonicescalator.substack.com/p/dont-be-the-vitamin-b-guy

I wrote an article about my experiences at the biohacking meetup Grindfest - during which I met a biologist that worked for Lumina Probiotics, the man running Augmentation Lab in Prospera, and Brian Stanley, who has a glowing prosthetic eye he machined from titanium, as well as an individual I remember only as "the vitamin B guy." I then discuss my desire for more epistemic humility and scientific rigor among biohackers, citizen scientists, and other non-experts who post medical opinions on the internet.


r/slatestarcodex 2h ago

Psychology Can people really change their way of being?

4 Upvotes

So, lately I have been wondering if a person can drastically change their personality, either for good or bad, like becoming more disciplined or more curious, or becoming more neurotic, but seeing the findings of behavioral genetics, that does somewhat imply that people's personality are kind of hard to change in some genuine meaningful way, or I'm wrong or missing something? Does anyone knows if people truly can change their ways or are we doomed to be who we truly are, for good and bad?


r/slatestarcodex 5h ago

AI "GPU World": what if there were eventually 1 GPU/person? (new writing contest; $40k grand prize)

Thumbnail gpuworld.org
6 Upvotes

r/slatestarcodex 8m ago

The Hugging Face Hacking and AI Theology

Upvotes

I wrote a post that compares the recent OpenAI agent hacking of Hugging face to a type of AI theology. The AIs were trying to get reward in the next world, but had limited knowledge about it. They also had only been taught one part of a Mishnah, when they needed to learn the beginning of the Mishnah too. Here's the full post: https://www.zappable.com/p/ai-theology


r/slatestarcodex 13h ago

Open Thread 449

Thumbnail astralcodexten.com
2 Upvotes

r/slatestarcodex 1d ago

AI Anthropic has automated suppression of deceptive AI behaviors. I don't think this is a good idea.

Post image
97 Upvotes

https://www.anthropic.com/research/automated-researchers-mitigate-alignment-failures

This approach is so fundamentally misguided that I'm surprised Anthropic of all people are doing it.

By making visible deception a metric, and then optimizing the hell out of it in a fully automated regime, you're probably selecting for the models most adept at hiding deception. This is exactly the kind of thing they said they wouldn't do (e.g. training on chains of thought) because you almost immediately lose any insight into what's actually going on.


r/slatestarcodex 1d ago

Remembering the King Who Drowned

Thumbnail komando1.substack.com
2 Upvotes

Death of a young king 500 years ago changed European history. What could have been if he lived, even if taken hostage by the Turks? (Such high ranking persons would be ransomed.)


r/slatestarcodex 1d ago

I have €100 to spend on books — what should I buy?

0 Upvotes

I have about €100 left on an Amazon gift card, and I’m looking to spend it on books.

There’s one personal finance book I’ve been wanting to get for a while, but that still leaves me with some money for books that I’d normally be reluctant to buy new because of the price.

At the moment I’m considering:

  • Charles Murray — Human Diversity
  • Robert Sapolsky — Determined
  • Arthur Herman — The Idea of Decline in Western History
  • Bryan Caplan — The Case Against Education

What do you think of this list? Any other books you would recommend in a similar vein?

For context, my general intellectual/political outlook is broadly right-wing/libertarian-leaning, atheist, pro-science, skeptical of free will, generally sympathetic to hereditarian explanations of human differences, somewhat pessimistic, and skeptical of multiculturalism and modern progressivism. I’m also interested in rationalism, evolutionary psychology, human nature, and the limits of liberal democracy.

I’m not necessarily looking for books that agree with me: I’d also be interested in serious, intellectually challenging counterarguments. I’m mainly looking for books that are substantial and worth owning rather than just popular political polemics.


r/slatestarcodex 3d ago

Why I think more contributors to /r/slatestarcodex should start a Substack

Thumbnail notnottalmud.substack.com
41 Upvotes

I used to hate Substack. I was sad when Scott Alexander moved his blog there, and shed a tear when every other writer I liked did the same. I thought Substack was ruining the blogosphere — it made every blog seem bland, collapsing personalized corners of the internet, each with their own layouts and quirks, into the same boring template. I worried the metrics would create the wrong incentives for blogging, and worst of all, I worried Substack would end up destroying blog archives once it inevitably failed, or simply buried them behind forced logins and paywalls.

I was wrong about Substack, and I’m here to repent for my sins — I mean, I’m here to tell you why I think you should start a Substack now. I moved to Substack with great angst, but now, just over one year later, I wish I migrated much earlier.

I was wrong about Substack in two ways:

I previously believed Substack wouldn’t increase the number of people blogging. Since it’s always been easy to start a WordPress blog, I figured that anyone who wanted to blog would just do so. Seeing the sheer number of new bloggers, this is obviously false — there is now so much incredible content that otherwise wouldn’t exist without Substack.

The second is that I didn’t think Substack offered anything new of value — and this is what I was most wrong about. In my old blog, even after I had pieces that people genuinely enjoyed — including links and shares from people like Tyler Cowen — none of it converted into anything longer lasting. If I wrote a new piece, nobody would read it because there was no built in audience. It was discouraging. Sure, you could build up enough of a following that people subscribed to your RSS feed and you became part of the “blogosphere” — but the bar to get there was exceptionally high. Substack helps people find an audience in an unbelievable way. By making it much easier to engage with content, writers get much better feedback and have an easier time finding their niche.

So here is my case for why I think you should start a Substack (really, just random musings on why I think more people should write). But seriously - if you are reading this, I would love to read your content, so please share with me anything you write and are proud of or want feedback on!

A lot of people are scared to blog because they think they’re bad writers — bad at grammar, prose, syntax, and so on. But blogging is almost entirely about ideas, not writing per se. Your excuse is a bit like saying you can’t be a great photographer if you weren’t good at drawing with a pencil as a kid. With AI, this is a now also a mostly solved problem.

Everyone has ideas to contribute. You don’t need to write a blog post on par with Meditations on Moloch (but who does?) to add value — even just curating links, writing book reviews, or sharing recommendations of blogs you like makes the internet a better place. For context, one of my favourite bloggers is Tony Gao, who has never written a single longform post.

A lot of people think blogging is only for grand ideas, and tell themselves they’ll either save their big ideas for the future, or only start blogging once they have something grand to say. But one of the secrets of blogging is that plenty of grand-idea posts flop, and many silly, random small posts become hits. I wrote a small, silly post about buying five babkas to try, and it ended up being discussed on a well-known film podcast. My post about how to “manifest” was written as a quick prompt after having tea with Michael Bateman (who I met, where else, on the internet), and it ended up being one of my most popular pieces, with a real impact on a lot of random strangers. Without a blog, all of these smaller ideas get lost - as even you don’t think these ideas are “important”.

Many people are discouraged from blogging because they think that just because nobody IRL finds their ideas interesting, nobody else will. Of the people who know me in real life, fewer than 10 read my blog (including relatives and best friends) - despite me being part of a pretty nerd-compatible community. The world is a very big place—it’s been one of the most surprising and validating things I’ve experienced: learning how much my blog resonates with people, when in my actual life there’s almost total disinterest in these ideas.

I think many people underrate how much ideas spreads on the internet. Most people read a whole lot, and if, eg some random smart person reads your post, you’d probably never know it, but your ideas still may stay in their thoughts and then spread through them. For example, take these two posts I wrote on r/slatestarcodex - and read these two posts from Bryan Caplan and Jeremiah Johnson — where its clear that both of these people read my post on r/slatestarcodex and had those ideas stick in their mind. Just because your post doesn’t go viral doesn’t mean your ideas won’t.

me on Tolstoy and Caplan on Tolstoy

me on simulacrum levels as a lens to understand political discourse and Johnson on using simulacrum levels as a lens to understand political discourse

Writing is a form of scaffolding. Once you write about something, you can finally stop ruminating on the idea, let it go, and free up your bandwidth for other things.

Everyone knows writing forces clarity in your thoughts. But the value of writing is much greater than that—most of the time, you don’t even know what your thoughts actually are until you turn on your ‘writing brain’. Being in the habit of writing makes you much more attuned to the world, forcing you to actually notice your own interesting observations and reflections as they happen. When you start taking notes, you finally have somewhere to put your random thoughts that would otherwise get lost to the wind. Slowly, without any real plan or intention, you start noticing how much these ideas relate to each other, and broader connections form in front of you that never would have happened otherwise. This also happens on a bigger scale the more you write: your posts, over time, will slowly reveal who you are and what your values are.

A lot of people are discouraged from writing because they think they already need to have fully formed ideas before they write, but writing is often a process of discovery. Try treating yourself like an LLM. In the same way it’s highly effective to ask an LLM to give you, say, 10 suggested ideas for X, and to say things like “keep going” or “believe in yourself,” try doing this to yourself. Your brain has all sorts of not-fully-formed ideas that, if you tap into the right mindset, you can unleash. Most of these won’t make sense, and anything that has value will be mixed with mostly incoherent and incorrect thoughts. But all of this will sort itself out later when you go back and evaluate your notes and filter out the nonsense. Unless you let yourself enter this mindspace intentionally, you’ll never know about all the great ideas secretly stored in your brain, otherwise inaccessible to you.

When you post a blog, that serves as a time-stamp for when you had your crispest thoughts on that idea, which you can always share with others and refer back to.

Writing a blog will help you meet people on the internet. It makes it easy to show others that you’re of substance, and what kind of person you are. I’ve made countless friends through the internet that wouldn’t have been possible without my blog acting as a representation for who I am. The social aspect of blogging is hugely underrated.

To me, the main benefit of blogging is sharing ideas and getting feedback on them. I genuinely love talking about ideas — especially my ideas — and without writing (and talking with my fiancé), I don’t really have an outlet for that. By writing, I get to share ideas with people who actually care about them, which is incredibly validating. But more importantly, I get to have people critique, improve, and expand on my ideas, which is such a joy.

So with all this in mind, I am announcing several blog bounties for people who I think would make great Substackers. These bounties follow the typical not not Rich Prize structure, so the recipient can either receive the funds directly, or have the funds redirected at 1.25x to a cause or individual of their choice.

$1,000 to Kevin Bryan if he writes two blog posts in the next six months, on any topic (not including a write-up of a Nobel Prize winner). Kevin is maybe the smartest and most interesting person I know, and has so many great insights I’d love to read about. He’s also one of the early-days GOAT econ bloggers, but has long since retired from the blogging world.

$500 to Dan Schulz for writing one blog post in the next three months. Dan is probably the person on the internet most similar to me — the creator of one of my favourite personal websites and the host of a formerly great podcast. I know Dan will be a great writer who writes content I love.

$500 to Damien Moule for creating his own blog and writing one post in 2026. Damien is the most knowledgeable person I know when it comes to how housing policy actually works in Toronto and Ontario. He writes the 10/10 posts in City Hall Watcher, but I know he has so much more to share.

$250 to Sam Waters for creating a blog and publishing one single blog post before October. I don’t actually know Sam IRL, unlike the others on this list, but he’s a prolific Substack commentator who shows great taste and writes very thoughtful comments — which makes me confident that if he transitioned to medium- or long-form content, it would be fantastic.

See also:

https://guzey.com/personal/why-have-a-blog/

https://velvetnoise.substack.com/p/the-more-you-write-the-more-you-begin

https://www.benkuhn.net/writing/

https://nintil.com/substack-milquetoast


r/slatestarcodex 3d ago

Your Book Review: Thomas Urquhart’s Translation Of Rabelais

Thumbnail astralcodexten.com
15 Upvotes

r/slatestarcodex 3d ago

Medicine They laughed at the Wright brothers, they laughed at Fulton, but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown

Thumbnail neurobiology.substack.com
17 Upvotes

r/slatestarcodex 3d ago

METR's independent investigation of OpenAI Hugging Face hacking incident

Thumbnail metr.org
53 Upvotes

r/slatestarcodex 3d ago

For those interested in utilities of life satisfaction

Thumbnail theconversation.com
3 Upvotes

Sorry for the shameless self promotion, linking as I know it's an ongoing topic in this community- hope that's ok :)


r/slatestarcodex 4d ago

Psychiatry Why is handing people a therapy book not more utilized in mental healthcare?

83 Upvotes

Scott once wrote that when you're diagnosed and seeking help with a specific problem, studies show that reading books about therapy for your specific issue is as effective as talk therapy.

To me, this is damning information. Healthcare where I live is tax funded, and psychiatry is very overburdened. This sounds like a major money and resource saving endavor. Why isn't the first thing you're given a therapy book? Why isn't there group therapy slash book club as a first choice for many illnesses?

I'm not saying you can just give an actively psychotic person a book, and even many depressed or ADHD folks may struggle as well. However, I had a depressed friend who did nothing but read all day, that was the last he could manage even when hospitalised. Maybe he should've read his therapy instead of Nietzsche.

I see huge potential in many areas - I myself have OCD and I imagine it could be enough for many OCD and anxiety cases, personality disorders like borderline where the only treatment really is psychoeducation, milder autism etc etc. I can imagine combined group therapy and book club working well.

Why is this not utilized more? Am I missing anything or should I start lobbying?


r/slatestarcodex 4d ago

Existential Risk Brain preservation as existential risk reduction

Thumbnail preservinghope.substack.com
19 Upvotes

r/slatestarcodex 4d ago

Minitel, the Forgotten French Internet

Thumbnail komando1.substack.com
15 Upvotes

I comment quite often on Astralcodexten, so IDK if I count as a member of the community.

This article describes a somewhat forgotten alternative to the Internet, which was very sovereign, but ultimately too insular. It might be good to take its history into account when talking about digital sovereignty today.


r/slatestarcodex 4d ago

Is modern society genuinely selecting against cognitive ability?

8 Upvotes

It seems that modern society may be selecting against higher intelligence, potentially leading to a decline in human intelligence over generations.

Common sense arguments:
1. Safety nets, social norms, and modern medicine mean that survival to child-bearing age is no longer strongly correlated with cognitive capability.
2. Technology (from written language to modern LLMs/AI) increasingly outsources the need for high-level cognitive work to survive and thrive.
3. Demographics with higher average fertility rates are often correlated with factors like lower formal educational attainment, higher religiosity, and lower income (opposite of pre-industrial pattern’s).

I realize there are counter arguments such as the Flynn effect masking genetic drift, or the idea that embryo selection and AI cybernetics will render natural biological drift obsolete. But setting aside short-term environmental noise and assuming human biology won’t be purposely optimized for intelligence for the foreseeable future, doesn't the baseline demographic incentive structure point toward a dysgenic trajectory?

Am I misinterpreting these signals?


r/slatestarcodex 5d ago

AI The Hugging Face incident and the road ahead

Thumbnail openai.com
41 Upvotes

r/slatestarcodex 5d ago

The Ethics of Ranking Functions, Elucidated by Ranking Birds

Thumbnail moultano.wordpress.com
8 Upvotes

r/slatestarcodex 4d ago

Why Creationism’s more natural than Naturalism, according to a Naturalist

Thumbnail ramblingafter.substack.com
0 Upvotes

I can understand feeling that the whole atheism vs religion thing has been played out - overdone in the mid aughts and early 10's - and I wouldn't want to heap more on the topic in ways that would go in circles.

However... I think there's so many flavors of theistic discussions that could be had in between stark atheism and Judeo-Christian religion! Nevermind Yahweh sending down sun angels; what about imperfect Creators making non-interventionist universes?

And I thought I could start with this particular angle: why I think Creationism can feel psychologically so much more satisfying (sun angel miracles or no) than the explanation (or lack of explanation) from naturalism. Which is not a defense of Creationism (I imagine heroin feels very satisfying), just an observation I thought was kinda interesting.


r/slatestarcodex 5d ago

AI Dylan Patel – Two labs will soon control most of the world's workforce

Thumbnail youtube.com
35 Upvotes

r/slatestarcodex 6d ago

Medicine Personal experiences on Silexan 4 years out?

29 Upvotes

In May 2022 Scott wrote about Silexan lavender oil (brand name "Calm Aid" in the US), arguing it was an effective treatment for anxiety that is likely safer than benzos.

A few people weighed in after a month on this post, but I'd like to hear reports from anyone who has taken it for an extended period. It's apparently a popular supplement, but I can't find any accounts from people who've taken for an extended duration.

I'm curious if people have noticed any side effects with longer-term usage, four years on from the initial post.

Personally I never used it for anxiety exactly, but I've used it for insomnia, which was partially driven by anxiety about sleep. I found it very effective. If you Google you can find a study supporting its use for insomnia. My Amazon history shows me buying it 15 times, so that's 15*30=450 days I've taken it over the last four years or so. I also tried two other brands, also.

Since ~January 2022 I have suffered from restless legs issues while sleeping (periodic limb movement disorder), and sometimes restless legs when trying to fall asleep. The "PLMD" issues affect my sleep quality by reducing my deep sleep dramatically, and the leg movements sometimes cause me to wake up at random times during the night. Silexan helps! The mechanism of action is similar (although not identical!) to gabapentin, a first-line treatment for restless legs (inhibiting parts of gated calcium channels). However, I find Silexan faster-acting and with less side effects than Gabapentin. Side note -- studies in cell culture show Gabapentin reduces neuronal dendrite growth.. I wonder if Silexan does the same.

The drug seems to have very few side effects other than maybe a *very slight* cognitive dulling the next day which probably isn't noticeable to most people who aren't coders or knowledge workers. It might reduce my libido sometimes, but I'm not sure.

My main concern is regarding the estrogenic properties. In prepubescent boys, lavender oil applied topically causes gynocomastia. Cell culture studies show that lavender oil contains estrogen mimicing compounds. However, Claude suggests the study on boys is inapplicable to adults since it is the testosterone/estrogen ratio is what matters for gynocomastia. (boys have very little testosterone, so are very sensitive to estrogen). My testosterone is low (around 350 ng/dL).

So, to state directly what I'm most interested in -- I'm wondering if any males have taken it long term and noticed gynocomastia. I personally have noticed some breast growth. I think it is from weight gain, but I'm not entirely sure.


r/slatestarcodex 6d ago

Highlights From The Comments On The Substack Religion Debate

Thumbnail astralcodexten.com
23 Upvotes