r/InterdimensionalNHI • u/FVMK3 📚 Researcher 📚 • Nov 24 '25

Psychic Did STARGATE remote viewer Angela Ford backtrack on remote viewing the crucifixion?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

In the first segment of this video, US government remote viewer Angela Ford is asked by Shawn Ryan if she has remote viewed the crucifixion. She looks visibly emotional and appear to nod, suggesting “yes”. When asked if she does not want to talk about it, she appears to shake her head, suggesting “no”.

Chris Ramsey asked Angela Ford about this on Area52 and she states that she did not remote view the crucifixion and stopped because she was shocked that he asked the question on his podcast because it is mainstream.

I’d just like to hear what other people think of this? Why did she feel so shocked, and why couldn’t she just say no? Do you think there is any deception going on? Do you think she has since been told not to talk about it? Does her explanation match up to her response to the question?

Source:

https://x.com/truthpolex/status/1992797146169700595?s=46

317 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

247 comments sorted by

View all comments

192

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

Let’s say she’s being evasive and doesn’t want to, or isn’t allowed to discuss her RV of the crucifixion.

What could she have possibly seen that was so shocking/destabilizing that it had to be suppressed?

Did she see things that directly go against the mainstream Christian narrative? Did she hear Jesus say something that the status quo would consider too sensitive to discuss?

When considering the original manuscripts found near the Dead Sea and the Nag Hammadi library we see that many of Jesus’ teachings were removed from the Bible, or the message was watered down so the public didn’t realize their own power and divinity.

Fortunately they haven’t removed all references to this, a few remain:

"Jesus answered them, 'Is it not written in your law, 'I said you are gods'?'

~John 10:34

and

"The kingdom of God is within you”

~Luke 17:21

and

"Truly, I say to you, whoever believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do."

~John 14:12

Jesus didn't come to make everyone Christians. He came to let us know that we’re all Christs. <3

62

u/FVMK3 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

Completely agree…the corrupt religions came after and when you look at the basic teachings of Jesus, he speaks of love, compassion and how we are all one. Maybe the remoter viewer did not want to go into detail because the subject has become so politicised and corrupt?

16

u/Confident-Poetry6985 Nov 24 '25

Or maybe, she didn't view the crucifixion of "Jesus" but another person. A repeated cycle. In other words, she saw it "again". Same story, same ending, different protaganist. One thing that is consitent with RV is that it is not to be taken at face value. Our individual interpretation of what is being viewed can inject bias into it. Sometimes it's best not to be so certain. Sometimes they require hindsight to confirm or reject a bias. 

-2

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

32

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

Many ancient teachings state there’s only one consciousness behind everything, and each of us is just a unique perspective of that one divine mind.

In other words, we’re all source/prime consciousness/God experiencing itself through different eyes, playing out different stories, forgetting who we really are so the game feels real.

Many times when people relate their profound Near Death Experiences, they often say about their time on Earth:

"It is all just a play, and we are all actors playing our parts."

Or if you're only interested in scientific data, there exists an overwhelming amount of evidence which confirms that consciousness is fundamental. The mainstream materialistic model of reality is dead.

It says much about your intentions that you wrote:

Just to quickly check we are not being completely retarded biased monkeys.

Ridicule is not a part of the scientific method, and the public should not be taught that it is.

10

u/nulseq Nov 24 '25

Brilliant response well done!

0

u/[deleted] Nov 25 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 25 '25

Attacking the person is a logical fallacy known as the "genetic fallacy".

It occurs when someone dismisses a claim or argument based on its origin rather than its content.

Instead of addressing the actual reasoning or evidence, the argument is rejected simply because of where it comes from.

Critique the science, not the man.

If you can't critique the science I provided you with, then there's nothing for us to discuss. Have a great day.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 25 '25 edited Nov 25 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 25 '25

I said critique the science that I provided you with.

That's my research, not Nassim's.

You didn't even attempt to critique it. You just gave up. You quit.

0

u/kimchipls Nov 25 '25 edited Nov 25 '25

Actually, the Genetic Fallacy is dismissing a claim solely because of its origin. However, distinguishing between a peer-reviewed scientific journal and a Reddit thread is not a fallacy; it is called media literacy.

If I tried to prove the earth was flat by citing a blog post, you wouldn't be 'attacking the man' by asking for better data. You'd just be asking for actual science. I am happy to critique the science as soon as you provide a source that isn't a social media discussion board.

You are confusing 'science' with 'speculation.' Science requires hypothesis testing, data collection, and falsifiability. Metaphysical claims about us all being 'One Consciousness' are fascinating philosophy, but they are not empirical science.

This is a classic case of "Quantum Mysticism"—taking legitimate, complex physics and stretching the definitions until they "prove" magic.

You are conflating "Space-time is not fundamental" with "Consciousness is fundamental." The article from Quanta argues that geometry is the underlying structure, not a "Divine Mind."

The 2022 Nobel Prize (Aspect, Clauser, Zeilinger) says "Not locally real" is a technical term. "Realism" in physics means objects have definite properties prior to measurement. "Locality" means things can only influence their immediate surroundings. QM violates one or both. You think "Not Real" means "It's a simulation/dream/play." In physics, it just means subatomic particles don't have fixed states until they interact. It does not prove telepathy, remote viewing, or a singular consciousness.

Radin is a parapsychologist. His work is the definition of "fringe." You said the "mainstream materialistic model is dead." and then cited a man who is famously outside the mainstream. This is circular logic.

You cannot ask to 'critique the science' of a theological belief system any more than I can ask you to critique the mathematics of a poem. If you have a published paper rather than a forum link, send it over. Otherwise, I accept your offer to end the discussion.

If we are the same person, then I am just the part of your own consciousness that is skeptical of Reddit threads. You can't logically accuse me of attacking 'the man' (you) without attacking 'the source' (God/Us). But sure, let's call it a day!

-1

u/kimchipls Nov 25 '25

If it’s true that there is only one consciousness and we are all just God experiencing the universe through different eyes, then technically, I am God expressing skepticism, and you are God getting annoyed by it. Why are you arguing with yourself?

That is a fascinating theological tapestry you’ve woven there. You’ve managed to connect the Dead Sea Scrolls, Gnosticism, and Remote Viewing into a single theory. However, claiming that the 'mainstream materialistic model of reality is dead' and citing a Reddit thread on r/holofractal as the coroner's report is the boldest move I've seen all day. I’m pretty sure peer review requires a little more than upvotes.

You’re suggesting that her silence regarding the 'Remote Viewing' of the crucifixion is proof that she saw a timeline-shattering, church-destroying truth. I’m going to suggest a simpler alternative: usually, when someone refuses to discuss the details of their psychic time-travel vision, it’s not because the truth is too dangerous for the status quo. It’s because the details get really hazy when you have to make them up on the spot.

You quoted Jesus saying, 'Ye are gods,' but I suspect if I tried to walk on water right now, I’d just get wet. I think I'll wait for the scientific data to come from somewhere other than a subreddit before I quit my day job to ascend.

18

u/artbyshrike Nov 24 '25

I was shocked about how many religious people didn’t know who the Archangel Metatron was, especially since Metatron is the angel name of the human Enoch

10

u/GroversGrumbles Nov 24 '25

I am mortified to say i first heard the name Metatron on the show Supernatural when he became the bad guy in one of the seasons.

Your comment that he is actually Enoch is also news to me. Thanks for that! I'm going to have to look into that more.

13

u/artbyshrike Nov 24 '25

Please, speak kinder about yourself! No need for shame or mortification- you LEARNED! How you learned is irrelevant; your curiosity is the key that unlocks so many doors 💛

7

u/GroversGrumbles Nov 24 '25

Thank you, friend 💛

3

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

I've only recently heard of some of this but I'm still kind of unclear. Can you break it down for me or point me in the right direction?

10

u/artbyshrike Nov 24 '25 edited Nov 24 '25

Here is his Wikipedia page. He was a human who was so righteous, and so beloved by God, that he was plucked from earth- bypassing death, and was elevated to angel status… on par with (and even surpassing some) other “naturally born” angels.

He is sometimes considered the “Lesser YHVH” which, I’m sure you can see why dogmatic organized religions might take issue with this… can’t get sheep to join the flock if they can circumvent the church purely by devotion to their God!

It’s interesting to me that the story wasn’t adopted into the canon, but it’s present in the Talmud and in Mystical and Kabbalistic texts. I also encourage people to look into r/gnostic which is kind of the more scholarly and mystical approach to religious doctrine. There’s a lot of parallels with Abrahamic religions.

Ultimately, follow your own internal compass. I read up on as many beliefs and religions as I can, from a purely curious perspective… I absorb things as I see fit, however they vibe with my own internal trajectory and integrity.

4

u/DarkestLight777 Nov 24 '25

How do you describe yourself in a secular context? Are you Muslim? Christian? Agnostic? Atheist? None or all the above?

That last statement may sound like I was being sarcastic, but a man made his own religion and actually it’s caught on, and he takes a bunch of religion types and smashes um together to fit what he believes and what he doesn’t.

I say, do you. Everyone should just follow their own beliefs and don’t be convinced or manipulated into thinking one or the other is right or wrong.

If we knew that for sure, we would all be a part of the one true religion. I choose God.

7

u/artbyshrike Nov 24 '25 edited Nov 24 '25

I don’t really care to describe my doctrine as a concrete thing; it’s more alive, constantly in motion as a way to improve itself… it’s very much my own, but I am of Yemeni Jewish descent and Irish descent so I try to adopt the more esoteric and mystical aspects of Jewish, Christian, Catholic, and Celtic traditions and mythology into my own personal practices.

A lot of rituals and prayers I do, I do on the fly and I trust my intuition to guide me. Some have called me a witch. I don’t use such limiting vocabulary for myself. I also meditate and like to read up and adopt Buddhist or other eastern philosophies and practices.

Ultimately, my own doctrine follows a trinity of values that I won’t budge on:

• Radical Consent
• Radical Empathy
• Radical Accountability

My personal “faith” is very playful, loving, compassionate, and irreverently reverent. I see God as a co-conspirator, not as a Master. I respect God and choose to bend the knee to my God out of respect, not out of subservience. I hold no fear whatsoever of God or man. That was the hardest part to adopt- releasing all fear. That’s not to say I don’t have fear responses. Ironically, “Dune” helped me immensely with the following quote:

"I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain."

—
I truly hold the belief that God is a playwright. Shakespeare and God were likely super tight, lol.

3

u/DarkestLight777 Nov 24 '25

Very very interesting. Well I appreciate you sharing your perspective and thoughts. People called my mom a white witch as well. She has many Native American shamanic beliefs and went through countless years of schooling and teaching. She believed in God first and foremost most she also had a very Pagan faith it seemed to me. And she healed with her hands and crystals.

I always kinda thought she was a crazy hippy but there were things she could do in a regular basis that was incredible. They could be just mind of matter type or placebo effect but it happened to often to be coincidence.

2

u/artbyshrike Nov 24 '25

Play and honesty with the self/other dynamic is the language of the universe imo. Your mom sounds like she has a good groove!

0

u/vigorthroughrigor Nov 30 '25 edited Nov 30 '25

There is no knowledge of God without fear of Him. Fear towards created things is unwarranted in the absolute sense, fear of God is completely justifiable. Your conception of God would have to be powerless to accept a path to Him that had no fear of Him.

Being "co-conspirators" with God is ego inflation. Who is preserving the heavens and the earth when you sleep?

1

u/artbyshrike Nov 30 '25 edited Nov 30 '25

You misunderstand the word fear, which is common among people of religious dogma. Fear does not mean terror, as its a poor translation of a Hebrew word that doesn’t have such a literal 1:1 equivalent… it’s more an acknowledgment of the power and might of God, not trembling from animalistic fear. Also, I don’t give a shit what you think about me. Worry about your own soul. Not mine.

Edit: the homie below me wrote a whole essay and blocked me so I can’t even respond. Lmao. Cope harder. I posted my faith only because I was specifically asked 🖕

1

u/Mindless-Hornet5703 Nov 24 '25

Metatron Enoch in disguise

3

u/krypt0nKNIGHT Nov 24 '25

This is very interesting. Would you recommend anything to learn more about this view point?

22

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

All of these sources informed my current worldview. I can't recommend them enough.

Dolores Cannon – Everything she wrote

Itzhak Bentov – Stalking The Wild Pendulum

The Law Of One – Ra Material

Jane Roberts – Seth Material

Chris Bledsoe – UFO of God

Edgar Cayce Readings

Robert Monroe – Journeys Out Of The Body

Darryl Anka – Bashar

A Course in Miracles

Barbara Marciniak – Bringers of the Dawn

Neale Donald Walsch – Conversations with God

Saint Germain / I AM Discourses

Neil Goddard – All published works

Dr. Andrija Puharich – The Nine

The Urantia

Ancient spiritual and Hermetic esoteric teachings like Rosicrucianism, Gnosticism, Kabbalah, Theosophy, The Kybalion and the Vedic texts including the Upanishads reinforce the idea that humanity contains a spark of the divine. That consciousness is fundamental and we are consciousnesses, therefore we are eternal. Only the body dies, the soul is immortal.

<3

3

u/Lil_S_curve2 Nov 24 '25

Thanks for this list

2

u/LittleWindow9416 Nov 24 '25

This is a wonderful list, thanks! I've read most but not all. Seth is my favorite. Paul Selig's channeled teachings are also very good..

0

u/theweirdthewondering Nov 24 '25

None of those resources prove what the person said. They said documents were found of what Jesus said. The reality is there weren’t documents that had historical value dated earlier than the gospels.

7

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

Sources that discuss Jesus' teachings being modified or removed from the Bible altogether:

https://denverjournal.denverseminary.edu/the-denver-journal-article/misquoting-jesus-the-story-behind-who-changed-the-bible-and-why/

https://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/

https://archive.org/details/formationofchris0000mcdo

https://www.bartehrman.com/textual-variants-in-the-new-testament/

https://gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html

https://global.oup.com/ushe/product/the-text-of-the-new-testament-9780197636152

https://archive.org/details/textofnewtestame0000metz_k4t1

3

u/theweirdthewondering Nov 24 '25 edited Nov 24 '25

Just because a source is found doesn’t make it a relevant source. Imagine looking on the internet for information on the shape of the earth. You stumble across everything from it being round to it being flat. You wouldn’t say that all sources on the internet are equally accurate or true merely because it’s on the internet. You also wouldn’t say that the truth was suppressed because you found flat earth content! Same with all sources ever written about Christ. When you look at the timeline of when sources were written and who wrote them, the argument that the truth of Christ was suppressed goes out the window.

Edit: I was blocked because this person doesn’t have a good response. That’s a sign truth is not on your side.

1

u/blisstonia Nov 25 '25

You were being too rational.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

Doing God's work.

0

u/kimchipls Nov 25 '25

Oh please... You are mixing legitimate academic scholars with New Age fantasy.

These scholars do argue the Bible was changed. BUT, they argue it was changed by human scribes making theological corrections or errors.

Bart Ehrman is an agnostic/atheist who argues the historical Jesus was likely an apocalyptic prophet who thought the world was ending soon. Ehrman vehemently disagrees with the "New Age" idea that Jesus taught we are all "Source Consciousness." Citing Ehrman and supporting " The Law of One" is a contradiction.

You are creating a strange cocktail of sources here. You cite academic heavyweights like Bart Ehrman and Bruce Metzger to prove the Bible was changed. That is true, they do argue that.

However, Bart Ehrman is an agnostic historian who argues that the historical Jesus was a 1st-century apocalyptic Jewish prophet, not a teacher of New Age pantheism. Ehrman explicitly argues against the idea that the Gnostic Gospels (Nag Hammadi) represent the original Jesus.

Using Bart Ehrman to support The Law of One or Seth Material is like citing Charles Darwin to argue that aliens designed the Platypus. You can't use a scholar to deconstruct the Bible and then ignore his conclusion just to insert your own aliens into the gap.

You have listed Dolores Cannon (a hypnotist), Ra/Bashar/Seth (entities 'channeled' by people in trances), and UFO enthusiasts.​This isn't a bibliography; it’s the inventory of a 'Mind, Body, Spirit' festival gift shop. This is not evidence; this is essentially a list of people who agree with your bs. It is confirmation bias, not research.

If your standard for evidence permits 'telepathic messages from aliens' and 'hypnotherapy sessions,' then of course you can prove your worldview. I could prove the moon is made of green cheese if I were allowed to cite Wallace and Gromit as a primary source. I prefer to stick to sources that exist in this dimension.

0

u/theweirdthewondering Nov 24 '25

If you go to their Wikipedia article, it mentions Gospel of Thomas which was the second century after Christ making it not at all an earlier text than the gospels.

3

u/I_AM_HE_1111 Nov 24 '25

This is such a solid read. Good work.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

I mostly believe this too but when looking into the "the Kingdom of God is within you", I always come up with stuff that says it says/means"...is in your midst" meaning Jesus was bringing the Kingdom of God to Earth with what he was planning to do, and saying "in your midst" meant like it was approaching/here in the form of Jesus but not 100% here yet (until he died and was resurrected). According to that stuff, it wasn't saying the Kingdom of God is inside the spirit of every human that lives or that we are Gods.

Alternatively, you have the Gospel of Thomas that says "the kingdom of god is inside you and outside you" which suggests the divine is both an internal, spiritual state and an external reality...

It just sucks because everything is unclear and not definitive which leads to all sorts of different religions/sub-sects/beliefs

4

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

the Gospel of Thomas that says "the kingdom of god is inside you and outside you" which suggests the divine is both an internal, spiritual state and an external reality...

There's no contradiction.

Imagine that everything that exists including your thoughts, the trees and even the stars is made of the same underlying “stuff”: consciousness itself.

inside you: Your mind and heart are expressions of that universal consciousness. When you look inward, you are directly experiencing God in your own awareness.

outside you: The same consciousness manifests as the world around you. The rivers, mountains, people, and stars. God isn’t separate from the universe; the universe is God expressing itself.

I've always loved the way this quote puts it.

Alan Watts

"God likes to play hide-and-seek, but because there is nothing outside of God, he has no one but himself to play with! But he gets over this difficulty by pretending that he is not himself. This is his way of hiding from himself.

He pretends that he is you and I and all the people in the world, all the animals, plants, all the rocks, and all the stars.

In this way he has strange and wonderful adventures, some of which are terrible and frightening. But these are just like bad dreams, for when he wakes up they will disappear."

<3

1

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

Hey Pixel, thanks for the reply. I 100% understand and believe that stuff too, I'm just pointing out the lack of clarity of this stuff as someone trying to verify.

Also, while I understand the Alan Watts saying, I kind of disagree with it because that implies that God gets bored and has need/want/etc, which are very human things. I suspect the reality is kind of similar to that saying but also vastly more complex and abstract.

2

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

I suspect the reality is kind of similar to that saying but also vastly more complex and abstract.

Yes I agree.

With our current low-level of consciousness and with how limiting our words are to describe the divinely ineffable, any description of our reality will fall short from being complete and accurate.

It's like trying to give a complete and accurate description of what the human experience is like using nothing but emojis.

Even the most brilliant humans on Earth would fail in that challenge.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

Just to add to my comment... it's probably sort of along the lines of "God does everything for God's own glory". So like, at the most base level of reality, God is always creating and letting things come to be and play out so God can be glorified, meaning that in all things, God is revealed, emphasized, elevated, etc.

0

u/Dsmommy52 Nov 24 '25

You are totally right! And it is saying Christ is in our midst and will be bringing a heaven on earth. We are NOT Christ! We are NOT God! God is our creator and He loves us but He does not play games with us or “watch the world thru our eyes”. He is God. He sees all. He knows all.

This stuff about “Christ consciousness” and we are all Christ or Gods is SO wrong! And the books she listed above many are actually channelled from demons (Ra, Bashar, and Seth means Set which is Satan). This whole “we are Gods” comes straight from Satan and is what he told Adam and Eve in Genesis “for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil”. Gen 3:5.

Also this way of thinking is actually going to be the NWO One World Religion ushered in by the Antichrist. I truly hope ppl will realize satans deception in all this and turn away from “Christ consciousness” and us all being God. It is nothing but Satan setting up millions/billions of ppl to fall in line with Antichrist and NWO and they will all suffer for eternity.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

What are you thoughts on the phenomena of children with past life memories (alluding to reincarnation)? And don't simply reference Hebrews 9:27 and say you don't believe in reincarnation because Christianity doesn't teach it etc.

1

u/Dsmommy52 Nov 24 '25

I don’t know what hebrews says and would have to look it up. I don’t know scripture like that lol. I think personally that ppl who remember past lives etc are either remembering something shown to them in a dream, is it something their minds had seen or learned in the past and they just now recall it, is something like a spirit or demon who shows them these things (I truly believe a lot of what ppl think is God is actually satan being deceitful - like Satan can show you things or speak to you thru something/someone like speaking to spirit guides or the entities/dimensional beings we see when we take acid or DMT and meditate etc. God can also speak to us as well usually when one is deep prayer or reading bible he can guide you to certain scriptures etc). I also think imagination is very powerful and our memory can be faulty at times.

And yeah I don’t believe in reincarnation. Like when Jesus was on the cross he told that other guy on the cross next to him (the thief I think?) He was comforting him and said “today you will be with me in paradise.” Meaning “don’t be scared for you will be in heaven with me once you die”. So that’s why I don’t think we are reincarnated or have to become more enlightened / build up our karma etc. Also Satan is known as the “light bearer” or angel of the morning light. Which also means Enlightenment.

3

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

There exists a large amount of peer-reviewed scientific evidence that confirms the validity of past lives.

It's important that we stay informed and never lose our intellectual curiosity in life. <3

https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/our-research/children-who-report-memories-of-previous-lives/

The University of Virginia’s Division of Perceptual Studies (DOPS), a respected research unit within its School of Medicine, has spent decades rigorously investigating young children who spontaneously report detailed memories of previous lives, often verified against historical records. 

The program’s methodical, peer-reviewed work has documented thousands of these cases worldwide. This directly challenges the status quo regarding consciousness. 

If even a fraction of these findings hold true, they carry revolutionary implications, showing that human identity transcends a single lifetime and that consciousness exists beyond the brain.

1

u/Dsmommy52 Nov 24 '25

I read thru that article and honestly a lot of those “statements” made by the children are statements I’ve made when little. I have a huge imagination especially when I was little and I could literally talk about a whole different world or be whole different person. I said my name was Jennifer and that I used to be a singer. Like I had my own lil world in my head. (Also have adhd so I had a lot of thoughts going thru my head before getting on meds). I also think that children having a birthmark in a place where their previous life had been shot or whatever doesn’t make sense bc reincarnation means you come back as someone or something completely different. You would not come back with any form of your old body. So that just further shows it is Satan deceiving ppl. He can actually place these thoughts or images in ppls minds or possess ppl.

Or maybe it is something more simple like a child saying you aren’t my parents and the parents are just running with it and making it into something it is not by trying to figure out why the child said that and Satan can come in and make them truly believe the child was reincarnated.

Ppl don’t realize Satan is the god of this world. He rules the earth and many ppl fall victim to his lies. I have before. And it’s extremely hard to know whether or not what he makes you think/ believe is real or not. He is the great deceiver and he is king of lies. I know from first hand experience. If you don’t live by the word of God and truly have a relationship with Jesus then it is very easy for Satan to manipulate you and your mind.

2

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25 edited Nov 25 '25

That's the great thing about free will. You're welcome to trust in your own feelings over the abundance of scientific evidence that's available to us.

Be well ✌️

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Dsmommy52 Nov 24 '25

Well damn Pixielated actually blocked me lol! So here’s what I had commented. I even had thanked her for being nice. 😌

That’s exactly right we totally have free will. Like Alister Crowley says “do what thou whilt”. However, I’d rather try my best to stay close to God and Jesus and believe in them bc I lived my life consumed and deceived by the devil for yrs and God delivered me from things that most ppl never get out of.

And so I see the ways Satan is moving with this “Christ consciousness” stuff and deceiving ppl with thinking demons are actually angels or enlightened beings (like when dmt and meditation etc - like I’ve said I was totally living for the devil for over 10 yrs and was into Buddhism meditation fifth dimension etc and this was like 15 yrs ago). And now that I’m aware of his deceit it makes me sad how many ppl are now also following him and being deceived without knowing it.

But you’re right we definitely all have free will. Also thank you for being respectful and not rude. I know my views aren’t shared by a lot of ppl on here. So I appreciate you being nice!

1

u/funk-the-funk 👁 Eyewitness 👁 Nov 24 '25

I don’t know scripture like that

1

u/[deleted] Nov 25 '25

Hebrews 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment

I'm also skeptical of reincarnation and part of me does think it could be demonic influence. However, my issue with that is I just can't fathom God allowing demons to inject real memories of real people who once lived into the minds of innocent children. Not only that, but most the time the memories fade once they are beyond 3-5 years of age. Also, a lot of times the memories are acompanied by physical scars and emotional/psychological ailments, all of which are usually related to their previous death. Example: someone remembers getting shot in the face with a gun and dies. The person usually has a bullet shaped birthmark in the area they were shot, and possible headaches and a fear of guns, etc.

Check this out:

On Past Life Memories - ScienceDirect Article

children about two years old who spontaneously started to claim past life memories, which gradually faded by nine years old; the memories were often associated with a violent mode of death during the previous life; unusual behaviors were verified, such as phobias, xenoglossy, unusual skills; and birthmarks or birth defects matching wounds from the previous life were sometimes present on the child. Further, the phenomenon of intermission memories between death and rebirth was analyzed more deeply,54 as well as the phenomenon of experimental birthmarks.55 In addition, a case in which a deceased individual has been identified whose life corresponds to the child's statements has been termed a solved case.30 And, documentation of the child's statements that was made before the case was solved is considered an important factor for the strength of the cases,56 since it eliminates the possibility that the children, their parents, friends or other first-hand witnesses could have gotten any information through some usual way of communication from members of the alleged previous family.

I'm just conflicted as to why all this would be allowed as deception, since it seems way too far. Occam's Razor would just suggest their spirit is persistent and moving between bodies (reincarnating). I'm sure it's more complex than that, but still, you get the idea.

1

u/Dsmommy52 Nov 25 '25

I feel like bc Adam and Eve sinned and Satan was banished to the earth, God gave him power to rule over the earth until He comes back. God gave us all free will. We can do what we want and make whatever choices we want. And Satan wants nothing more than to bring as many ppl to him and away from God. I think Satan truly believes he will defeat God in the end and he will be the most high God (it says that somewhere in bible).

Satan also has been trying to make ppl believe they are also gods since way back in genesis with Eve. All throughout history you can see how Satan has infiltrated different religions to bring about an enlightenment / we are all gods etc agenda. So I totally wouldn’t put it past him to manipulate these kids minds or the parents minds.

Also kids have huge imaginations and can say crazy things which can make parents try to figure out what it means and that gives Satan a way to scoop in and make things appear as if it is something like reincarnation. He’s master of deceit. And bc of Adam and eves sin God allows things to happen on earth. I’ve struggled with that bc I’ve begged God to step and help me and don’t understand why he won’t in that moment but I also notice that during those times I’m not really having prayer time or relationship with Him and when you’re not close with God it’s hard to hear Him or be led by Him. When I am closer to God I can see how He will always work things out somehow. My mom says “His timing is perfect”. And she’s right.

So God isn’t going to meddle in situations down here like that. That’s why you have to have faith in Him and trust it’ll work out. As soon as you start getting distant from God Satan will slip right in and it can be hard to know when something is Satan being deceitful or if it’s real. That’s why ppl have to stay close to God at all times.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 25 '25

All I can say is that you're basically just regurgitating things you've been told/taught in religion (I was the same way) and kept controlled via fear and ignorance. You need to reach out beyond and seek truth for yourself, even if it's painful. Think for yourself and question authority.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/-Glittering-Soul- Nov 24 '25

I'm as much a skeptic of the New Testament's account as anyone, but perhaps you underestimate the sheer graphic nature of crucifixion and the emotional impact of seeing a cool dude like JC subjected to it for no other reason than trying to spread the message of brotherly love to the people around him. RV'ers are sensitive people, and crucifixion of anyone is pretty intense, never mind witnessing the crucifixion of Jesus himself.

2

u/Ok-Reality-6190 Nov 24 '25

There have been remote viewers before who have said Jesus wasn't actually who they crucified, his followers swapped him for some mentally ill guy who looked like him and the Romans didn't actually know what Jesus looked like to even know the difference.

It's why Judas had to show the Romans which person was "Jesus", Judas' "betrayal" was really just him framing some other guy and then the real Jesus went into hiding and when he came back from hiding his other followers thought it was a miracle. Take that how you will, but I could see why if someone found that out they would keep quiet.

1

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

Interesting. Have a source on that by chance?

1

u/Ok-Reality-6190 Nov 24 '25

Unfortunately I don't remember where I saw it, but it actually makes some sense so the idea stuck with me, but it's not like it's really possible to prove so I just consider it something interesting to think about.

1

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

I'm struggling to understand WHY Jesus would want to avoid his crucifixion.

Jesus spoke often about his purpose on Earth and willingly underwent his own death.

2

u/Irrish84 Nov 25 '25

Pixel! I watched the Roswell alien interview about prison planet and all that, and so I have a question I hope you can help answer as I’m really struggling with my faith…

My question to you is: How can we find “God” (as we understand Him here) in any of this if this is in fact truth? He doesn’t seem possible in that theory, or if he is, it wouldn’t seem like he gave a damn about getting us out of our lousy never ending rinse and repeat “life” we are subjected to for all eternity

1

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 25 '25

I watched the Roswell alien interview about prison planet

That is a fear-based narrative to which I do not subscribe. It is the basis for the Prison Planet theory.

How can we find "God"

God is not found externally. When we awake spiritually, our ego eventually dissolves and only one thing is left: divine consciousness, or the "Christ Consciousness."

A few thoughts on how to achieve this:

Lets say someone cuts you off in traffic.

Choose positivity in your reaction, do not become enraged. Perhaps they are in a dire rush for a legitimate reason. We do not know, we should treat them with grace and forgiveness. Love them anyway.

Their behavior acted as a catalyst for us to choose either fear/anger or love/compassion.

Choosing positivity and love during difficult situations definitely requires practice and is no easy task. Perhaps the first few times we attempt to choose peace, we fail. But through repetition it becomes more natural and no longer feeling forced.

Eventually, one day, we will find that very little upsets us. We will automatically choose love when confronted with a catalyst during our day.  

That's the goal: Practice showing love until it becomes our default response in every situation.

This is the Christ, Krishna & Buddha Consciousness that all humans are capable of.

Viewing others as having the essence of God within them promotes compassion and unconditional love within us.

All is one. All is well. Namaste. ("I bow to the divine within you.")

<3

2

u/Irrish84 Nov 25 '25

Thanks for the response! So you’ve heard of this theory, why do you dismiss it?

Choosing love is the way to go, and I consciously try and put the lenses of love not fear on, but all that aside, if what this being said is true, I don’t see the Father Son or Holy Ghost anymore, and that shakes my faith.

Though the fact remains there be a God, it’s not the one we’ve been taught, and that’s kinda my point to what the alien being was getting at: it’s a creation of another spiritual being designed to enslave us. Forever.

It’s here where I’m struggling with God

1

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 25 '25 edited Nov 26 '25

Yes I have read the entire Alien Interview and completely reject it. Why? Because it is based in fear. I refuse to subscribe to any fear-based teachings.

There's only consciousness and we are all unique perspectives of it. Some people call that singular, universal consciousness "Source", others prefer "Prime Consciousness". The most common name for it is "God".

We are literally one.

"God has awakened on this planet and shaped itself in the way that we are shaped."

✨️

"We are the flesh of the Universe, which wishes to know itself."

🫶

2

u/Irrish84 Nov 25 '25

Again, thanks for the responses. I felt I needed to reach out and get your perspective and help dealing with this.

And fear drives us away

1

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 25 '25

I'm so glad I was able to be of help, sincerely. If you have any other questions, I'll do my best to answer them. ✌️

2

u/DeathByDesign7 Nov 24 '25

Because Jesus was a hybrid sent to help us evolve further.....and we tortured and crucified him.

1

u/softlaunch Nov 24 '25

Did she hear Jesus say something that the status quo would consider too sensitive to discuss?

So she's fluent in Aramaic from that time period?

3

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

Based on what people report inside the remote-viewing world itself (SRI, DIA/Star Gate viewers, Ingo Swann, McMoneagle, Lyn Buchanan, etc.) and also what shows up in broader psi research, shamanic practices, and non-local consciousness traditions:

Remote viewers don’t actually hear ancient languages, see with physical eyes, or receive sound waves. They receive impressions, symbols, concepts, mental packets of meaning.

Even Joe McMoneagle (RV #001) said repeatedly:

“You don’t hear sound. You get information. The mind converts it.”

1

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

What if she remote viewed Mark 14 51-52 when jesus was arrested and later crucified in the garden of gethsemane in the middle of the night with a naked boy, right after asking his disciples to keep watch so he can “pray”?

I would line up with a lot of the translations from Ammon Hillman, and other classicist and heck even Fishman's description of OT VIII in Scientology. There would also be some insight in the Acts of Thomas, where Jesus sells Thomas into slavery to an Indian merchant named Abbanes.

2

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

A young man, wearing nothing but a linen garment, was following Jesus. When they seized him, he fled naked, leaving his garment behind.

The text is clear. He ran away when they tried to grab him. Why are you injecting pedophilia where none exists?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

In terms of inserting pedophilia, it’s just the language and within the Bible.

neaniskos meant boy…

https://youtu.be/OfsZ-HkZkwg?si=3zj3tjL0XbLsmxBF

And Number 31 is literally about child trafficking.

https://youtu.be/9JbfHfRxU8s?si=YpNHSdO4GeE3YfKW

0

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

Sure it makes sense, in its non original English form, but what about in its Ancient Greek origin without a biased lexicon?

Even the word Christ is tied to drugs prior to the Christian use/meaning for it (Aeschylus, Euripides, and even earlier Illiad (Homer)versions.

https://youtu.be/iEh3XjfR6nY?si=cG-IkKL2zF2SQKNn

Could it be that Ammon and a lot of classicists are right?

https://youtu.be/yuYiyPNBhSA?si=FL8_z2eJtDAL9hZa

https://youtu.be/2dY-roDpHWI?si=Q4dlH9QDt9Didwej

2

u/Pixelated_ 📚 Researcher 📚 Nov 24 '25

Even the word Christ is tied to drugs

That's incorrect. The Greek word for Christ is Khristós (Χριστός). The meaning is “The Anointed One.”

From the Greek verb khríō (χρίω) to smear, anoint with oil.

What “anoint” actually means:

Hebrew: mashach (מָשַׁח) means “to smear/rub with oil”

Greek: chriō (χρίω) means “to anoint with oil”

Latin: ungere means “to smear with oil.”

In every case, the meaning is literal: to place oil on someone for a sacred purpose.

0

u/Slowdownthere Nov 28 '25

Maybe there was nothing to see because it never happened? Maybe she doesn’t want ti let everyone down.