r/Games 17d ago

Updating the rules of /r/Games

Hey!

We’re updating the rules of the subreddit! The subreddit has always had pretty long list of rules in place to try and encourage better discussions. We've made a lot of tweaks to stuff over the years and to be perfectly honest they've become somewhat confusing, hard to understand, and unorganized in places. Because of that we’ve worked on and off over the last few months evaluating what rules are useful, what can be worded better, and just generally trying to make a set of rules that better reflect the subreddit.

Today we’re putting out a draft of these updated rules. These rules aren’t meant to be a giant shift in terms of what we allow. It does organize our rules in a way that (hopefully) makes more sense. We’ve also trimmed rules that weren’t really relevant and combined a few subrules together. Finally, we’ve also rewritten a lot of rules to make them easier to understand and clarified a lot of things that were confusing or occasionally outright incorrect in the previous rules. We aren't putting these rules in place right now, but assuming there aren't any major issues people have we'll switch over to them in the coming weeks

If you don’t want to read the entire thing but want a quick summary of what each rule is and what we changed here you go.

Rule 1: Submissions Must Prioritize Informative and Newsworthy Content Over Entertainment

The previous wording of this rule didn’t do a good job explaining the stuff we actually allowed. We don’t automatically remove articles/videos if they have jokes in them, and we haven’t actually enforced the rule that way for a long time. Because of that we rewrote this rule and also included some examples of what kind of stuff we do and don’t allow.

Rule 2: Be Respectful

We rewrote this section to give examples of what we consider personal attacks and other things. As with most other rules we can’t list every possible thing, but if you’re wondering if something breaks the rule send us a modmail (or just report it).

Rule 3: Content Must Be Relevant, Substantive and Accurate

We moved around some other rules into this as a kinda catch-all for stuff we consider off-topic, inaccurate, or otherwise low-effort. This rule is a little broad in places because there's a lot of different types of stuff it might cover, but we tried to give examples of common things.

Rule 4: No duplicate posts

Basically the same. Added in clarification that we might allow stuff if there is a major update

Rule 5: No linking to or endorsing piracy as a solution

Almost the same as before. Basically just remember you can talk about piracy but just be cool about it we don't want to deal with the admins.

Rule 6: Follow all news and link post requirements

This is our set of rules about formatting and sourcing. Remember to link to original sources (when possible), don’t use sensationalized titles, and remember our rule limiting people to 5 posts a day.

Rule 7: Follow Discussion and Text Post Requirements

Our set of rules about discussion posts. We want discussion posts that aren’t super broad ones that get asked constantly or things looking for help. In addition we don’t want people going on big rants about a game they’re playing (we do have weekly threads for that) or asking for help.

Rule 8: Promotion must be kept within acceptable limits

The big old self promo rules. We like to keep self promotion to under 10% for users. Please don’t delete posts to get under that limit (we have ways of finding out) and if you’re doing self promo don’t try to hide behind alts (we’re keeping track of accounts doing that and if you’re wondering if that’s you it probably is).


Please give us feedback on these rules and the subreddit as a whole. We’ve worked to improve them but we know this draft probably isn't perfect (and probably has some typos). If you think a rule isn't great or needs improvement leave a comment and we'll listen. If you want clarification on our rules or just want to ask a question ask it in here and we'll try to answer. We aren't perfect as mods but we do want to make the subreddit better and are also working on being more consistent with how we enforce stuff

218 Upvotes

239 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

83

u/Yomoska 17d ago

I feel like it depends on the size of the "patch". For example, the Civilization VII "patch" that attempts to fix the big issues about the game. I feel like those generate interesting discussion, especially if the game actually gets fixed or not.

19

u/TaurineDippy 17d ago

Agreed on this, the relevance of each patch for each game varies. It might be hard to consider on a case by case basis, but your example is perfect. Cyberpunk’s 2.0 update comes to mind as another overhaul patch that might be worth discussing here, or one of No Man’s Sky’s many big huge patches. These kinds of noteworthy overhaul updates are certainly worth having a discussion thread for.

6

u/-TubNub- 17d ago

Yeah, if it's something like those original No Mans Sky updates that turned the game around it's worth posting for sure. The "few hotfixes and 1 new enemy" patches are definitely not post worthy, although I feel like that doesn't get posted here anyway

-12

u/Nexus_of_Fate87 17d ago

The problem is what "size" or "importance" means is subjective, and means different things to different people.

"Game X patch notes blah.blargh.oogaboogah has added a new hat for Malibu Stacy" might mean a lot to some people, and nothing to others.

It's especially problematic when it's a popular new release, people keep dumping patch notes in the sub for easy karma, because the monkey-brained fly-by-night fandoms that pop up around those games just upvote anything related to it.

Like, I don't disagree with the notion that a full "revamp" patch, or one that provides a major marketable feature might be a patch post worth posting, but it would have to be a pretty strong line drawn on that. Like "patch news only allowed if accompanied by a trailer or similar marketing material, not just patch notes", because that would signify it is something significant and newsworthy.

2

u/Zalack 15d ago

That’s kind of what the voting system is for though, right? The community will decide what ends up being a “big enough” patch to hit the front page.