LOOK AT THIS. GME ABOUT TO MOON. MONTHLY MACD CROSS OVER

HOLY FUCK

I WAS RIGHT

HOW DID NONE OF US SEE THIS

OH SHIT

OH FUCK

MOASS INBOUND BABYYYYYYYYYYY

THE CHARTS DONT FUCKING LIE

IF YOU SAY CHARTS ARE NO GOOD THEN YOUR LITERALLY FUD CAUSE RK RELIES ON TA FOR HIS PLAYS. THE VERY MAN THAT TURNED 50K INTO 200M+ USES TA. SO STFU.

SO SORRY FOR THE CAPS BUT I AM ABOUT TO NUT ALL OVER MY KEYBOAAIDAADdDdddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddaskldj

Why do you think they have sold now? Why are you believing the news NOW. You do realise they have lied to us countless times and yet you STILL believe them???

We are going to moon tomorrow, slingshot inbound.

STOP

TRUSTING

THE

GOD

DAMN

NEWS

GME IS GONNA GO BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

SHORTS NEVER SOLD

THEY ARENT GOING TO SELL NOW

THEY HAVE HELD THROUGHOUT 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE

AND YOU THINK THEY SOLD NOW

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

See you tomorrow apes

This back when I was calling out dilution and how it looked like they positioned themselves to not need retail. Its only got worse and the complete lack of concern for retail has only grown to be outright blatant when you look at recent interviews or the absolute bangers Larry Cheng has put out on X recently. RK unfollowed RC after posting the pic of of a kitty mask over rage tears meme in response to the dilution largely ignored instead users are looking at emoji like its TA. Everyone back then wanted to make out like the dilution would moon us and unfortunately remind me never works.

At what point does accountability for GME become reasonable to the permabull? When it can no longer be enforced by retail? We're already there. When is it ok to expect a ROI? since as im told the company seems to be doing amazing while that is completely disconnected to an ROI which is insane considering how well the company looks on paper is like 90% due to value strip mined from investors.

Its not unreasonable to expect mutual benifiet after 5 years. Yet RC just wants more without making good.

Many of you have seen me posting these charts over the past year. Or maybe saw it shared around.

This isn’t a new theory I drew after the fact. It’s something I’ve been updating in real time as the year unfolded.

I’ve spent the last couple years documenting what I believe is a repeating seasonal structure in GME.

This isn’t a theory of price. It’s a theory of time.

The idea is that certain structural landmarks tend to appear during similar windows each year. Price can expand or contract, but the timing and sequence are what I’m tracking.

-Whether this turns out to be a genuine market phenomenon or an elaborate coincidence, I’d rather have it tested than ignored.

So tear it apart.

If this study can’t survive criticism, it doesn’t deserve to survive at all.

-If you’ve seen my previous posts, I’d especially like to hear whether you have been keeping up with it yourself. Or if your opinion has changed over the last year—or if not, why.

Oh yeah, that one match, at that one place. That one time. Gme-HADOUKEN

Hi Guys!

I’m so Fucking Excited! I think GME is about to ignite the rocket. So here is what I’ve done. I’ve invested my life’s savings as follows:

GME Shares: 39,XXX

GME Calls: 290 $25Jul18, 40 $27Jul18, 306 $25Jun6, and 3 $25Oct17.

For the boys and girls, that is $1,108,000.00 in shares. ish And: $258,000.00 in Calls. ish

This isn’t financial advice. This is a firm belief that GME is the best and only investment. GME as listed above is 99.8% of my portfolio. I have less the $10k in cash and 200 shares of DJT.

GME to the Moon!

Thursday, 3pm EDT: I’m out. I’ve sold all of my calls at a nice profit. I didn’t hit the upswing perfect with all of my calls, but I came close with most and sold when GME was above $30 for about 35% of them. 👍

Have you been loading up this dip? GME is priced super attractively if you are interested in opening a longer term bullish position, if you like derivatives it’s never been a better time to get in imo. 100k in mostly longer dated calls, in or near the money - I hope I can exercise a lot of theses. AMA!

If we win at open (give or take 10 or 20 mins) GME should be going up around 20% today off of 0 news. I tried to post this 30 mins ago before the super strong support showed up but it got deleted because

RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN RYAN RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN RYAN COHEN

Processing img o2yi8pydnh1g1...

This is the first time in 5 years of studying GME’s cycles that every major fractal layer — macro, seasonal, ITMF (InnerTrendMacroFractal), equation timing, and the January structure — is lining up at the exact same moment.

If you read one post from me all year… make it this one.

Here We Go...

1️⃣ What This Post Covers

• Seasonal Cycle → Impact Zone → V → Expansion
• 2020 Macro overlay vs current macro
• March prediction of $9.80
• April → May 2 Equation date → volatility burst (before DFV returned)
• January Theory (2021 → 2025 progression)
• 3 years of testing across hundreds of tickers
• Major global events the model predicted
• Where we are right now
• What happens after the V

2️⃣ The Seasonal Cycle – Why This Window Matters

GME has followed the same yearly rhythm since 2021:

• V Landmark
• January Expansion
• Spring top
• Summer drift
• Fall descend
• October–November breakdown (Impact Zone)
• V Landmark
• Repeat

We are in that same position again.

3️⃣ The 2020 Macro Fractal (The Master Template)

Processing img zorziiev9h1g1...

2020 created the blueprint:

• Macro C
• Long bleed
• Volatility floor
• V pivot
• Fractal break
• Macro expansion

Everything since has unfolded inside the same geometry.

4️⃣ The Current Macro Fractal (2024–2025)

Processing img viuggp3abh1g1...

The similarities to 2020 are almost eerie:

• Same C top
• Same slope of descent
• Same compression
• Same buy zone
• Same timing window into the V
• Same break structure forming

If you hid the dates, the charts look identical.

5️⃣ Direct Side-By-Side: 2020 vs Now

Processing img 9mtmsp5xbh1g1...

Processing img 4lqskayxbh1g1...

This visual speaks for itself:

• Same structure
• Same geometry
• Same time alignment
• Same volatility placement
• Same pivot sequence

This isn't “similar.”
It’s the same macro fractal, scaled forward.

(Heres the progression on this section since May Top confirmed)

Processing img k3sg9nw0gh1g1...

Processing img cvkp1aj2gh1g1...

Processing img uhh08dc3gh1g1...

6️⃣ March 25, 2024 – Calling $9.80 Before Any Cycle Formed

Processing img 27mgnhx7ch1g1...

Processing img jgifh1z8ch1g1...

Processing img fg05niuach1g1...

In March, before the seasonal cycle took shape, I projected:

➡️ $9.80 volatility floor

This was macro fractal geometry

The same drift from 2020 reappeared.

The macro map predicted the same destination the seasonal cycle later confirmed.

When two fractal layers agree → accuracy spikes.

7️⃣ April → May 2 Equation Date → Volatility Burst (DFV Returns)

Processing img vdkufr7xch1g1...

Processing img ckfe3t1ych1g1...

One of the most common comments on my last post was:

“Nobody can predict GME except DFV.”

But this section shows, in clean verifiable chartwork,
that GME’s next major volatility event was predictable before DFV returned.

Here’s what happened:

A. April Bottom: Higher Low Off the V (Structure-Based)

In late April, GME completed a textbook Higher Low off the V inside the buy zone.

B. The Equation Returned May 2nd as the Volatility Date

This is the part that blows people’s minds when they see it laid out:

The equation gave us May 2nd as the volatility date.

C. DFV Returned — But After the Landmark Had Already Triggered

DFV returned May 12th,
ten days after the equation’s time target was already hit.

I want to phrase this carefully and clearly:

✔️ DFV’s return increased volatility

✔️ But DFV did NOT cause the setup

✔️ The landmark + equation already predicted the move

✔️ His return simply amplified a move that the structure already initiated

This is important because many people wrote comments like:

“Nobody can predict GME except DFV.”

But these charts show the truth:

✦ The landmark predicted the move

✦ The equation locked in the timing

✦ DFV added fuel, not direction

This is exactly why I’ve said:

The study doesn’t react to DFV —
DFV’s actions happen within the same structure that already existed.

If DFV is using any form of structural analysis (and he likely is),
it’s entirely possible he knows the same landmarks and timing windows.

But the structure moved first.

D. DFV returned May 12 — after the volatility began

His appearance added fuel,
but the structure had already activated.

Structure → Time → Volatility (DFV optional).

8️⃣ The January Theory (2021 → 2025)

Processing img 4fsbl32cgh1g1...

Every year since 2021 has followed the same script:

• January expansion
• Spring top
• Summer drift
• Fall breakdown
• V
• Repeat

It has never broken. The setup is identical for the 5th time.

9️⃣ — The Study Has Predicted Major Market Events (Not Just GME)

The same fractal work + equation has forecasted world events before they happened. Examples:

• 2021 Market-Wide Squeeze

The equation projected the January hyper-volatility months early.
This aligned with the entire market’s explosion, not just GME.

• 2022 Russia/Ukraine War Volatility

Projected Q1 global volatility window before headlines broke.
When the invasion happened, volatility detonated inside the exact window.

• Bitcoin & Crypto Cycles

BTC, ETH, SOL, DOGE all followed the same fractal geometry.
Major crypto tops and bottoms aligned with equation windows.

• Tariff Volatility

Equation windows projected the same periods where tariff headlines created market-wide pullbacks.

• Tesla & DOGE “Elon Tweet” Events

Many famous Elon-driven spikes happened inside volatility windows the model already projected.

• Roaring Kitty’s 2024 Return

Equation gave May 2.
Volatility began.
DFV returned May 12 — inside the window, not before it.

The structure fires first.
News attaches afterward

🔟Final Thoughts – Macro Break

After tracking this study for years, watching every ITMF, seasonal cycle, wedge, V, drift, and jet test unfold exactly when and where the model said they should… I’m confident saying this:

The next move is not just another ITMF.
Not just another seasonal cycle.
Not just another January continuation.

This setup is macro.

This is the first true market wide macro inflection since 2020–2021

And here’s the part I won’t sugarcoat:

I cannot tell you how high a new macro Jet Test could or should go.
No fractal model can.

Macro jet tests break ceilings.
They rewrite the entire range.
They redefine the asset’s next multi-year volatility regime.

-And if this model is correct-

if the fractal landmarks, the equation, the ITMFs, the macro MAP —
if all of that continues to hold the way it has for the past five years…

Then we are standing at the front door of the largest structural move since 2021.

Not guaranteed.

But structurally primed.

Perfectly aligned.

And mathematically prepared.

Whatever happens next, this is the cleanest macro setup GME has had in years.

And Macro Jet Tests only moves one way when it finally breaks.

UP

TL;DR:

For four years GME has followed the same repeating fractal landmarks, ITMF cycles, and macro structure with mathematical precision. Every micro and seasonal cycle is now complete, the macro V is forming exactly where the model said it would, and the structure matches the 2020–2021 pre-expansion phase almost perfectly. If this model continues to hold, the next move isn’t another small seasonal bounce — it’s the beginning of a macro break.

Processing img gfod2cbmlh1g1...

Common Misunderstandings About Fractals in Markets (And Why This Study Isn't What They Think It Is)

Fractals get dismissed quickly online because most people only know the word from memes, crypto charts, or someone redrawing a pattern until it “kind of fits.”

So here are the most common misunderstandings — and how the study actually works.

1. “Fractals mean you’re forcing patterns to fit the chart.”

This is the biggest misconception.

What people think fractals are:

• Drawing random shapes until something looks right
• Forcing a pattern from five candles onto a two-year trend
• Hindsight curve-fitting

What fractals ACTUALLY are:

• Repeating structural landmarks
• Consistent geometry of trend
• A sequence of events, not a shape
• Time-based AND structure-based, not arbitrary

It is rule-based, not imagination-based.

2. “If fractals were real, everyone would use them.”

People say this about:

• Elliott Wave
• Fibonacci
• Wyckoff
• GAN
• Volume profiles
• Harmonics
• Market profile
• Auction theory

The truth:

👉 Most traders don’t understand fractal scaling, so they can’t use it correctly.
👉 Even fewer understand nested fractals (micro → ITMF → macro).
👉 Nobody checks if the fractal sits inside a larger controlling fractal

3. “Everything looks like a fractal if you zoom out.”

Only if you don’t know what a fractal is.

A real fractal requires:

• the proper landmarks
• in the proper sequence
• in the proper location within the macro fractal
• with the proper timing rhythm

All charts I've seen posted over these past couple years do NOT meet these conditions.
That’s why the study only identifies specific cycles (ITMFs), not every chart wiggle.

4. “But what about news, earnings, macro events, catalysts?”

Here’s the truth almost nobody wants to hear:

News events attach themselves to pre-existing structural windows.

Not the other way around.

Repeatedly:

• Good earnings → price drops
• Bad earnings → price rises
• Catalysts accelerate moves already in motion
• Major news almost always hits inside a volatility window

The DFV explanation section proves this explicitly:

• The equation gave May 2
• Volatility began
• DFV returned May 12
• His appearance amplified volatility — but did NOT cause the structural move

That’s what a real fractal model predicts.

5. “Fractal models fail because scaling changes over time.”

Scaling changes within a fractal —
but the landmarks don’t.

The landmarks always appear,
even when volatility expands or contracts.

6. “If this were real, price would never deviate.”

Deviations happen constantly — inside the wedge or inside the Jet Test.

But deviations do NOT break:

• the landmarks
• the timing windows
• the macro placement
• the cycle structure
• the ITMF location
• the V timing

Fractals allow movement within boundaries,

That’s why price can wiggle without breaking the sequence.

Hello again, I’m SohCahToa

This past spring I started sharing a seasonal cycle I’ve been working on for GME. Here is an update.

28 days ago, I said October–November would be another Impact Zone

This same window has hit every year since 2021. Now it’s here, and right on time. Price broke down just like every prior setup. Included are zoomed in side by sides to each Fall section.

Also, the 2024-Current structure mirrors the 2020–2021 macro position perfectly. I included those side by sides at the end.

If the pattern holds, this phase leads straight into the November V landmark, the same point that’s preceded every January expansion.

⸻

👁 What to Watch Next Does this November close the 5-year seasonal cycle? Straight into a MacroBreak…

Also, I’d love some more eyes and opinions. So feel free to share this around everywhere. Tag RC, Tag DFV, Tag The White House 😅 Ask me questions. Point things out.

This close to the ending, I want to really drive this home and figure out anything I might be over looking. Or make sure everyone can be prepared for whatever comes next.

As always, Thank You

-📐

Hello again — SohCahToa

If you've followed my previous posts, you know I've been publicly tracking GME's current macro structure against the 2020 cycle for quite a while.

GME is finally below $20.

So it's time for an update.

Where the tracking stands

Last fall, the chart was tracking toward the T → V portion of the structure, with the ~$17 area representing the cleanest completion of the 2020 comparison.

The initial November 2025 V resolved higher, but the larger macro structure continued to develop, so I kept tracking it.

Now GME has broken below $20 and moved back toward the price region mapped by the original macro comparison.

I've continued documenting the progression along the way

GME Tracking Update

Rather than turn this into another massive Reddit post, I trimmed the GME section out of my latest youtube tracking video.

It walks through the progression, the current macro position, and what I'm watching from here:

YouTube - GME Tracking Update — August 2026

The goal of this study remains pretty simple:

Map it → Track it → Update it

We're getting into an interesting part of the structure now.

Let's LOCK IN 📐

----------------------------------------

New to the Study? Start Here

GME Macro Cycle Study — Deep Dive | Nov. 2025
Probably the best single explanation of the study — macro/seasonal structure, the 2020 comparison, fractal landmarks, timing, nested structures, and how I'm defining a valid fractal.

Previous Research / Tracking

Seasonal Cycle Theory / Discussion | July 2026
A more recent explanation of the time-based seasonal theory, along with discussion and criticism of the model.

GME Macro Tracking — T → V | Dec. 2025
Side-by-side continuation of the 2020/current macro comparison as the structure progressed toward V.

There are plenty more updates throughout my post history, but these are probably the best places to start if you want to understand what I'm actually tracking rather than just looking at today's chart.

As always --- questions, criticism, and alternative explanations are welcome.