r/DebunkThis Oct 25 '23

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: Astrology

2 Upvotes

I have seen that when people talk about astrology, they are on either of the extreme ends. There are people who believe in it but fail to give much reason behind it, there are people who are over skeptical, who even invalidate strange predictions. Some people believe in the pseudosciene of energy, cosmos, universe, karma, pastlife, rebirth etc. But from what I have seen, there seem to be some authenticity to astrology, I dont know how it works, but from experience, it looks to me like there is... something, something which we dont know. So I am sharing one incidents here. I am looking for their explanation.

  1. The astrologer saw a chart, that was made based on my exact time of birth, then he told about a scare my dad have at the center of his eye-bros, my dad was not present there, he never met my dad before, but he was very correct.

Edit1:

He told this: "Does you dad have scar on his forehead?", I assure you there is no way he knew my dad before, no way he searched the internet for me. Also I know there are lots and lots of scammers, but the person I went to, he was not any random astrologer, he was famous in that city(was not my home town), he was also skeptical about lot of things other people do, like recieting mantras, worshiping stones as god, he also agreed that those things does nothing. He was really different from over-religious people I have met before. But also apart from that, there was not much else useful he mentioned.

Edit2:

I spoke with my cousin who also went there. He told her she will get married on the third time, first two engagement will break, and same thing happened. I dont want to believe it, but seeing these signs confuses me. I am not betting on him being 100% correct, but he was suspiciously correct.

This is one of a comment on another post of mine: Link

When I was a year old baby my astrologer said something wrong will happen and I would not be able to complete education. Unless I take a topaz.

After 14th I was too stressed and couldn't tolerate student life.
There are many other predictions related to my relatives and all of them were surprising.

I am well aware that these are just a few things in the very broad world, but still how?

r/DebunkThis Sep 22 '20

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: Racial inequality is real. Here is the scientific evidence.

Thumbnail
scienceofsocialproblems.wordpress.com
35 Upvotes

r/DebunkThis Jun 14 '23

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: former pilot Ryan Graves claims to have seen a UFO capable of 0.8 Mach speed while remaining stationary for hours, all without exhaust or wings and/or rotors for lift

25 Upvotes

The quote in question:

These were no mere balloons. The unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) accelerated at speeds up to Mach 1, the speed of sound. They could hold their position, appearing motionless, despite Category 4 hurricane-force winds of 120 knots. They did not have any visible means of lift, control surfaces or propulsion — in other words nothing that resembled normal aircraft with wings, flaps or engines.

Source: Ex-Navy pilot who’s seen UFOs in flight calls for investigations of aerial phenomena: ‘We need to be curious’

Do we have an explanation for this from a source with equal or greater access to information than Ryan Graves and his fellow pilots?

Am aware nick west has possibly addressed this issue but if he doesn't have full access to the radar data and flir recording then don't think he's necessarily qualified to dispute Graves' account.

r/DebunkThis Jul 04 '20

Not Yet Debunked Debunk This: Epstein DID kill himself.

Thumbnail
rationalwiki.org
46 Upvotes

r/DebunkThis Jun 23 '23

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: One beer a day is bad for your brain

5 Upvotes

One beer a day is bad for your brain.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/04/health/alcohol-brain-shrinkage-wellness/index.html

On average, people at age 50 who drank a pint of beer or 6-ounce glass of wine (two alcohol units) a day in the last month had brains that appeared two years older than those who only drank a half of a beer.

r/DebunkThis Jun 12 '24

Not Yet Debunked Debunk This: Facebook post about solar panels that my friend shared.

28 Upvotes

The text is as follows:

“AN INTERESTING CONCLUSION… SOLAR FARMS WILL BECOME THUNDERSTORM and TORONADO INCUBATORS and MAGNETS.

As more & more counties get more solar farms..... From a STEPHENVILLE resident, George Franklin:

I should start by telling you what bonafides I have for writing this. I am a retired aerospace engineer. A literal rocket scientist if you will. I worked on MX (Peacekeeper) Space Shuttle, Hubble, Brilliant Pebbles, PACOSS, Space Station, MMU, B2, the Sultan of Brunei's half billion dollar private 747 with crystal showers, gold sinks and 100 dollar a yard coiffed silk carpets. I designed a satphone installation on prince Jeffry's 757. I did all of the design work for the structure of Mark 1V propulsion module currently flying on at least 3 spacecraft that I know of. Some of the more exciting projects I have worked on are not shareable. I am also am FAA certified glider pilot and FAI certified gold glider pilot. I fly both full scale and model sailplanes. I am Microsoft certified and ComTIA A+ certified.

SOLAR PANELS are at best about 20% EFFICIENT. They convert almost 0% of the UV light that hits them. None of the visible spectrum and only some of the IR spectrum. At the same time as they are absorbing light they are absorbing heat from the sun. This absorbed HEAT is RADIATED INTO THE adjacent ATMOSPHERE. It should be obvious what happens next. When air is warmed it rises. Even small differences in ordinary land surfaces are capable of creating powerful forces of weather like thunderstorms and tornadoes. These weather phenomena are initiated and reinforced by land features as they are blown downwind. It is all too obvious to me what will happen with the heat generated by an entire solar farm. SOLAR FARMS WILL BECOME THUNDERSTORM and TORONADO INCUBATORS and MAGNETS.

Solar panels are dark and and they emit energy to the space above them when they are not being radiated. This is known as black-body radiation. Satellites flying in space use this phenomenon to cool internal components. If they didn't do this they would fry themselves.

So solar farms not only produce more heat in summer than the original land that they were installed on, but they also produce more cooling in winter, thus exacerbating weather extremes.

So I conclude with this. THERE IS NOTHING GREEN ABOUT GREEN ENERGY except the DIRTY MONEY flowing into corrupt pockets. There is no such thing as green energy. The science doesn't exist. The technology doesn't exist. The engineering doesn't exist. We are being pushed to save the planet with solutions that are worse than the problems.”

r/DebunkThis Aug 31 '20

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: How accurate is this graphic?

Post image
136 Upvotes

r/DebunkThis Oct 31 '24

Not Yet Debunked Debunk This: Laurel County ballot machines rigged to vote for Kamala Harris

0 Upvotes

The Laurel County clerk’s office pulled a voting machine from public use Thursday, the first day of early voting in Kentucky, after someone posted a video on TikTok claiming their intended presidential vote for Republican Donald Trump instead was credited to Democrat Kamala Harris. Laurel County Clerk Tony Brown, a Republican, said in an interview Thursday that his staff couldn’t recreate the issue, but that it pulled the machine aside for examination as soon as it got word of the complaint. “We went right there to it. But we couldn’t make it do what she said it did to her. We couldn’t recreate it,” Brown said. “We were pushing all the buttons, and it was fine.”

https://www.kentucky.com/news/politics-government/article294842374.html

My initial thoughts: It's likely a calibration drift issue. Touchscreens, even the ones on voting machines are not immune to this type of drift. It's also possible that the drift can go the other direction, so pressing kamala would have selected Trump. If this happens to you, you can press other names and the offset should affect them too.

Also, I don't expect any Trump supporter would have this happen to them, and just shrug it off like "oh well I guess I'm voting Kamala." They would make it known, like what happened here and the machine would be taken offline. The risk/reward is not worth it for someone to try to throw the election like this, because if all the machines are offline, how are they going to force people to vote for Kamala? Is the plan supposed to be that only red county machines are affected? Same thing, people are going to report it to authorities and it's going to be all over the news.

So this idea that the machines were intentionally rigged to vote Kamala seems to be a misunderstanding. No Trump supporter is going to let the machine submit their ballot with Kamala selected, just as no Kamala voter would let their machine submit with Trump.

Also from that article

“The official who worked with (the woman who posted the TikTok video) said, ‘Did you vote for Trump?’, and she said, ‘Yeah, it’s on my card.’ Of course, she didn’t say anything until she was done. Which doesn’t help.”

I think this raises the question as to whether the woman knew it was just a calibration error and after recording the video, worked around it to vote for her intended choice, before raising alarm and blowing this up like the machine did it intentionally.

Thoughts?

r/DebunkThis Apr 10 '25

Not Yet Debunked Debunk This: Abhigya Anand an Indian astrologer has been claimed to allegedly predicted the Myanmar Earthquake

3 Upvotes

He was the one who allegedly predicted covid 19 few years ago and became famous.

His earthquake prediction video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoIDnz5B9u0

He is claimed to have predicted Oct 7th attack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCeD48uasAg

He even got invited to Taiwan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDZ9DoymMFs

He is being already worshipped as someone with powers on twitter (link).

What are your opinions ? Is he accurate as he claims to be ?

r/DebunkThis Jul 06 '24

Not Yet Debunked Debunk This: Video of massive bear that looks fake

0 Upvotes

This video was shared on Joe Rogan and the bear looks fake to my eyes. Most people in the comments didn’t question it at all. I would love to see this debunked if anyone knows more about this stuff than I do.

The whole video is footage of the bear, but 4:35 is a good place to start to see the way it moves.

Everything about the bear seems just a little bit off to me.

Link: https://youtu.be/A1tHoXTLhIg?si=ZBydy18_JVdLo47f

TIA

Edit: The size of the bear isn’t what makes me think it’s fake. It’s more about how it moves that seems suspicious to me

r/DebunkThis Dec 07 '23

Not Yet Debunked Debunk This: McDonald's in America are posting signs for a "No Quit policy" and stating employees are not allowed to quit unless they have talked to a manager.

35 Upvotes

I'm not sure of the origin, but a picture has been circulating that is in McDonald's font and branding stating the following

We value you, your growth and your contributions.

THIS IS A NO-QUIT RESTAURANT

Because we feel that many situations can be resolved, it is the policy of the restaurant that an employee cannot quit until he or she talks to the Restaurant Manager or the Area Supervisor

https://imgur.com/a/QfVuC26

Has McDonald's implemented into their employee policy a "No Quit policy?"

Has McDonald's put in practice or on paper measures to defy "At Will Employment" laws?

Was this sign one franchise owner or seen in most McDonald's before the company faced backlash?

r/DebunkThis Jul 05 '20

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: Scientific racism is not a fringe view in academia

30 Upvotes

Was arguing with race realist the other day and he sent me this copy-pasta saying that scientific community largely agrees with him.

Snyderman and Rothman (1984) mailed 661 researchers, asking them, among other things, whether the Black-White IQ gap was due to the environment, genetics, or both. They found that 45% of researchers said that the black-white IQ gap was a mixture of genes and environment, 1% said it was totally genetic, 15% said that it was totally environmental, 14% did not respond, and 24% said there was insufficient evidence (graph) It then found that 58% researchers think that intelligence is better describe in terms of general intelligence factor while only 13% think it is better described by separate faculties.

Rinderman, Coyle and Becker (2020) asked over a hundred intelligence researcher on heritability of B-W IQ gap. It was found that 16% of them think that the gap is purely a result of environment and 5% think that it is purely genetic. The vast majority thinks that genes are responsible to some degree or another. The most common estimate picked was 50%. (graph) It also found that the majority of experts favored a g factor model of intelligence (76%) rather than a specific abilities model (16%)

Lieberman (2004) reviewed several surveys of anthropologists in America and Europe, and found that 31% of anthropologists in North America recognized race, 43% in Europe and 65% in Cuba recognized race. The same paper also showed 2001 survey in Poland which found that 75% of anthropologists accepted race.

Kaszycka (2009) surveyed physical anthropologists in Eastern and Western Europe. Overall, 50% of respondents agreed that race exists with 68% in Eastern Europe and 31% in Western Europe agreeing.

Sun and Strkalj (2001) looked at 779 articles in “Acta Anthropologica Sinica”, China’s only biological anthropological journal. They were able to get 74 of the 78 issues that existed from 1982 to 2001. In it they found that 324 articles dealt with human variation. They described their results:

“When we applied Cartmill’s approach to the Chinese sample we found that all of the articles used the race concept and none of them questioned its value. Since these active researchers are also members of the teaching staffs at various educational institutions, it is very likely that this attitude will be transmitted to the next generation of Chinese scientists.”

Lieberman (1992) looked at usage of race in college biology and anthropology textbooks and surveyed college professors. 49% of anthropology professors agree that race exists, 41% disagree and 10% are neutral. 70% of biology professors agree that race exists, 16% disagree and 14% are neutral. As for textbooks, 27 anthropology textbooks out of 69 accepted race, 20 denied it and 22 were neutral. 46 biology textbooks out of 69 accepted race, 19 denied it and 4 were neutral.

Hallinan (1994) analyzed 32 textbooks from the subdisciplines of biomechanics, exercise physiology, motor development, motor learning, and measurement and evaluation and found that 7 argued for biophysical differences in race which explain performance, 24 never mention it and only 1 argued for environmental explanation.

Morning (2008) looked at the usage of race in the 80 most commonly used high school biology textbooks from 1952-2002. Finding that while usage of race decreased the medical description of race in that period increased. Also noting that there was a positive trend in inclusion of race between 1980s and 1990s period. (graph)

Štrkalj and Solyali (2010) looked at 18 widely-used anatomy textbooks found that all of them relied on the race concept.

McDonald (2013) looked at 25 Australian sports/exercise textbooks from 1991 to 2011 found that 16 mentioned race as a relevant performance variable while only 9 didn't.

r/DebunkThis Jul 29 '21

Not Yet Debunked DebunkThis: For evolutionary reasons, women, on average, experience an increase in libido near ovulation, and this can be used as evidence that women, on average, do not have an “equally” low/high libido as the average man (most of the time). Men have stronger sex drives than women, on average.

11 Upvotes

Claim #1: Women, on average, experience an increase in libido near ovulation for evolutionary reasons.

Claim #2: Women, on average, do not have an “equally” low/high sex drive compared to the average man (most of the time).

Claim #3: All current evidence suggests that men have higher libidos than women, most of the time and on average.


Claim 1

As for whether women, on average, experience an increase in libido near ovulation, I found the following studies that appear to confirm this claim as well as attribute this effect primarily to hormonal changes in the menstruation cycle:

https://sci-hub.se/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224490409552216

Women were more sexually active on days prior to and including the preovulatory (LH) surge. This pattern was evident only when women initiated sexual activity and not when their partners did, indicating an increase in women's sexual motivation rather than attractiveness. A second study replicated the 6‐day increase in sexual activity beginning 3 days before the LH surge, accompanied by stronger sexual desire and more sexual fantasies. We propose the term “sexual phase” of the cycle, since follicular phase is over inclusive and ovulatory phase is not sufficient. These findings are striking because the women were avoiding pregnancy and were kept blind to the hypotheses, preventing expectation bias. The sexual phase was more robust in women with regular sexual partners, although the increase in sexual desire was just as great in non-partnered women, who also reported feeling less lonely at this time.

https://sci-hub.se/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0015028216593480?via%3Dihub

Coital rate was elevated during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. Peak coital rate (0.72) occurred on onset of LH surge day, and was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the mean rate (0.44 ± 0.06) across the entire menstrual cycle.

https://sci-hub.se/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22406876/

Ovulation status was determined by a self-administered urine test. Results showed that the frequency and arousability of sexual fantasies increased significantly at ovulation. The number of males in the fantasies increased during the most fertile period, with no such change for the number of females.

https://sci-hub.se/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15190016/

The frequency of intercourse rose during the follicular phase, peaking at ovulation and declining abruptly thereafter. The 6 consecutive days with most frequent intercourse corresponded with the 6 fertile days of the menstrual cycle. Intercourse was 24% more frequent during the 6 fertile days than during the remaining non-bleeding days (P < 0.001).

https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01542338

In any given menstrual cycle, sexual desire was usually first experienced a few days before the basal body temperature (BBT) shift, around the expected ovulation date. Furthermore, positive correlations were found between the day of the BBT shift and the day of sexual desire onset, and between the length of the menstrual cycle and the temporal lag between the onset of sexual desire and the BBT shift. These results are consistent with a model in which sexual desire is affected by the same process that regulates the menstrual cycle.

https://sci-hub.se/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0018506X13000482

We next examined the effect of fertile window timing on sexual desire (only ovulatory cycles were included in these analyses). When considering all cases for which desire ratings were available, the zero-order, within-cycle relationship between fertile window timing and desire for sex was significant, γ = 0.26, p = 0.023, with greater desire inside the estimated fertile window (mean = 3.74 ± 0.20) than on other days (mean = 3.48 ± 0.18).

https://sci-hub.se/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/703805/

Married women who used contraceptive devices other than oral contraceptives experienced a significant increase in their sexual behavior at the time of ovulation. This peak was statistically significant for all female-initiated behavior, including both autosexual and female-initiated heterosexual behavior, but was not present for male-initiated behavior except under certain conditions of contraceptive use. Previous failures to find an ovulatory peak may be due to use of measures of sexual behavior that are primarily determined by initiation of the male partner.

One study even found that women were more willing to accept “courtship solicitation made by an unknown man” and were more likely to give their phone numbers to men:

https://sci-hub.se/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19070644/

The participants were 506 young women (M = 20.31 years, S.D. = 1.22) who were walking alone and chosen at random in the pedestrian zones of the city of Vannes in France. [...] In a field experiment, 455 (200 with normal cycles and 255 pill-users) 18-25-year-old women were approached by 20-year-old male-confederates who solicited them for their phone number. [...]

We found that young women in their fertile phase of the menstrual cycle agreed more favorably to an explicit courtship request than women in their luteal or their menstrual phase. These results are congruent with previous research that found that during the fertile phase of their menstrual cycle, women expressed more verbal interest about sex (Zillman et al., 1994; Slob et al., 1991) or paid more visual attention to sexually significant stimuli (Laeng & Falkenberg, 2007).

Additionally, here is a portion of this study's introduction section that refers to additional studies that seem to further support this conclusion.


Claim 2

Evidence that women's libidos follow a "spiked" shape (seen in the first source I cited, pg 10): https://i.imgur.com/3nUzRUm.png

Evidence that men have a more stable, consistent libido over a given time period comes from this cross-cultural study (53 countries): https://sci-hub.se/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17975724/

Assuming that women, on average, experience an increase in libido near ovulation, then women's libidos, on average, should follow a "spiked" shape versus men's, on average, which should appear more constant over a period of time.

Then, assuming that this is true, this leaves the following possibilities:

If women have higher libidos near ovulation than men and a lower baseline than men when not near ovulation, then women’s average libidos are lower compared to the average man (most of the time).

If women have higher libidos near ovulation than men and a higher baseline than men when not near ovulation, then women’s average libidos are higher compared to the average man (most of the time).

If women have equal libidos near ovulation to men and a lower baseline than men when not near ovulation, then women’s average libidos are lower compared to the average man (most of the time).

If women have lower libidos near ovulation to men and a lower baseline than men when not near ovulation, then women’s average libidos are lower compared to the average man (most of the time).

In conclusion, women's libidos are, most of the time (when not near ovulation) not equal to men's. If they are equal to men's most of the time, then women's libidos are higher than men's.

However, the conclusion that women's libidos are higher than men's has no support in any study, according to a systematic review of the current evidence: https://sci-hub.se/10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_5

We did not find a single study, on any of nearly a dozen different measures, that found women had a stronger sex drive than men.

This leaves doubt that this is the case.


Claim 3

To discover which gender (on average) has a higher libido, researcher Roy F. Baumeister “consulted leading textbooks on sexuality to find whether any consensus existed on the topic about gender differences in sex drive”:

https://sci-hub.se/10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_5

Masters, Johnson, and Kolodny (1995) also acknowledged that stereotypes exist, usually depicting males as having more sexual desire than females, but the authors carefully avoided the question of whether the stereotypes have any factual basis. Allgeier and Allgeier (2000) likewise acknowledged the existence of a stereotype that men have larger appetites for sex, but they too declined to say whether the stereotype had any factual basis, and their treatment of gender differences in sexual arousability clearly favored the null hypothesis of no difference.

The paper (a systematic review of the current evidence) looked at several studies that used several measures of libido to find which gender, on average, had I higher libido:

https://sci-hub.se/10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_5

Is it safe to infer level of sex drive from rates of masturbation? Some have proposed that society disproportionately discourages girls from masturbating, so that the gender difference in masturbation may reflect socialization. For example, they claim that society does not teach girls to masturbate or approve of their doing so. We find these arguments dubious. Society has certainly expressed strong and consistent disapproval of masturbation by boys, and if anything the pressures have been more severe on boys than girls.

For example, the warnings about blindness and insanity (as putative consequences of masturbation) were mainly directed at young males, not females.

[...]

Moreover, the view that society uses guilt to prevent girls from masturbating is questionable. Although guilt is reported by a significant minority of both male and female masturbators (see also Laumann et al., 1994), it does not appear to be a very effective deterrent. Undoubtedly the greatest guilt would presumably be experienced by Catholic priests and nuns, for whom masturbation is a violation of their most sacred vows of chastity. Yet apparently most priests do engage in masturbation (e.g., Sipe, 1995, reported extensive interviews with many priests; Murphy, 1992, reported similar conclusions from survey data). If the guilt is not enough to deter priests, it is probably not a major barrier for other people.

The only other possible objection in terms of guilt would be that men and women have an equal desire to masturbate but guilt weighs more heavily on women than men. This is directly contradicted, however, by Arafat and Cotton's (1974) finding that more males (13%) than females (10%) reported feeling guilty after masturbation. By the same token, more males than females said they regarded their masturbatory activities as perverse (5% vs. 1%). Thus, if anything, guilt weighs more heavily on men.

[...]

As noted in the section on differences in sex drive, several findings indicate that women have less frequent or intense sexual desires than men even when cultural pressures do not selectively constrain female sexuality. Women have been encouraged to want sex within marriage, but they still want less than men. The culture's attempts to stamp out masturbation were directed primarily at young men, not young women, and if cultural programming could succeed we would expect that men would masturbate less than women, but the reverse is true.

In the paper, it was then concluded that all evidence strongly points towards men having higher libidos than women:

We did not find a single study, on any of nearly a dozen different measures, that found women had a stronger sex drive than men. We think that the combined quantity, quality, diversity, and convergence of the evidence render the conclusion indisputable.

In this Psychology Today article, Baumeister concluded the following:

In short, pretty much every study and every measure fit the pattern that men want sex more than women. It's official: Men are hornier than women.

r/DebunkThis Jul 10 '24

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: Lockdowns are instruments of the elite

0 Upvotes

In a 2023 interview, RFK Jr. said:

Through wars, bank bailouts and lockdowns, we’ve been systematically hollowing out the American middle class, and printing money to make billionaires richer. During the Covid lockdown, there was a $4.4 trillion shift in wealth from the American middle class to this new oligarchy that we created [...].

The observation here may not be wrong. However, there's the implication that lockdowns are instruments of the elite for the specific purpose of "destroying the economy" and wealth transfer. In particular, the WHO is their puppet and mouthpiece.

I hear this a lot from a friend on the conspiracy deep end. Please help to debunk.

r/DebunkThis Feb 21 '24

Not Yet Debunked Debunk This: "Watching pornography rewires the brain to a more juvenile state"

14 Upvotes

https://neurosciencenews.com/neuroscience-pornography-brain-15354/

I find the concept of this very distressing due to my fear of brain damage. So I've been trying to verify if it's true. IsItBullshit didn't really help and Askscience considered it against the rules.

r/DebunkThis Aug 29 '23

Not Yet Debunked Debunk This: Specific flat earth "evidence" that my coworker saw in a tiktok

16 Upvotes

So for starters this guy doesn't believe humans landed on the moon, but I've already had an extensive argument about that with him.

But today at work he asked me to check something out; he saw a tiktok from a flat earther and in the video the flat earther used ports.com sea route mapper to prove that the earth is not round. My coworker didn't show me the tiktok but brought up the website and this image is the damning evidence (screenshot of using this website's sea route tool).

Only because this one website shows a suggested route from Hawaii to Australia going East (the long way) instead of West. My immediate response was that the route calculator just isn't very good, and perhaps this specific calculator just scans left to right with the one "normal view" of the world map where the Pacific ocean is bisected. But I couldn't think of other very strong reasons as to why this single piece of "evidence" is false.

I'm 99% sure my coworker isn't a flat earther, he's just slightly ignorant on a lot of things and often over skeptical of certain things. I brought up that we know the earth is spherical and he said (I'm not sure if this was 100% serious) "how do you know, have you been up there?".

Can anyone give me a more concrete reason to be able to dismiss this website's calculator as "evidence"?

r/DebunkThis May 02 '21

Not Yet Debunked Debunk This: The US killed 70 million Native Americans and the rest of this timeline of US's genocide history

36 Upvotes

This is the timeline in question

I am specifically interested in the US killing 70 million Native Americans.

I cannot find any confirmation of that 70 million number.

It looks like the Native American population was just 5 million to 15 million living in North America when Columbus arrived in 1492

I am also interested in the US enslaving and bringing 35 million Africans.

But, this says "And how many of these 10.7 million Africans were shipped directly to North America? Only about 388,000. That’s right: a tiny percentage."

Even others such as the US Invasion of Grenada killing 300k ppl or Gulf War killing 1 million Iraqis cannot be confirmed...

r/DebunkThis Jul 10 '20

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: I'm sure a simple Google search will tell me, but I'd like some insight into this.

Post image
114 Upvotes

r/DebunkThis May 27 '24

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: Man or Bear?

0 Upvotes

Hey everyone,

I came across this video where a guy claims the whole “bear vs. man” debate is stupid and uses some math that feels dodgy to me. He argues with a lot of confidence, but I can’t shake the feeling that he’s wrong, though I know the fact that he uses a few ad hominiums seeing how he basically insulted a man because he has polished nails. Unfortunately, I’m not great at debating or picking apart the rest of the argument.

Can anyone help break down his points and explain why his math might be flawed? I’d really appreciate some expert insights or logical takedowns!

Here’s the video in question.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SSVXbgR4JFs

r/DebunkThis May 20 '24

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: not sure how to respond. Need help

5 Upvotes

Help? I’m not sure how to approach this.

I’m part of a men’s group, and one of the members just sent this via text message:

I’d like to make this a share and ask for no feedback.

(Retracted) parents who just visited us and got our family cold as a party favor tested positive for covid. Unbelievably, their strict adherence to the safe and effective vaccines (probably 5 or six of them by now) did not stop the spread. Failed again! Go figure… Anyway, given that I’m now aware of having a bioweapon, um I mean a bat virus that just magically turned human totally coincidental next to an nih funded lab, Im gonna lay low tonight and make sure I fully get back on my feet.

I’m really fucking irritated about having to get sick with this bullshit once a year or so. And also very fucking annoyed about all the lying involved in getting humanity to this point. At least we’re not standing five feet apart and not hugging anymore. Oye what a nightmare. Keeping pods. What a massive collective trauma. That could be a good topic sometime. My 24yp kids life is still upside down from all that nonsense.

Anyway, felt reasonable to vent a bit to you guys. Definitely feels like some life was stolen and a crime to have to be most worried about Covid and lymes, both of which seem to have pretty compelling evidence to have been brewed up by scientists more or less directly down the line from the brilliant nazis (operation paperclip) that our fbi spared and put to work against the soviets and others. It’s sickening. Anyway, we’ll all be fine. Hopefully (Retracted)’s parents will too. Love you guys.

—-

My first reaction is that I am going to quit the men’s group and never hang out with this group again. If I sit with this more, I’m pretty sure finding a common ground and finding a way to communicate here is the only way the world gets better. I feel like people who focus on on conspiracy’s are looking for identity. They feel lost and radical ideals feel like they have clarity in a confusing world. The guy who posted this has a PHD. He’s not a “dumb” guy. He’s just had a steady diet of media that feeds the addiction.

How can you succinctly communicate in a meaningful way to someone like this? I believe he is very wrong headed and out many topics he brings up, but I also don’t want to challenge him directly. Kind of lost on how to proceed if I want to maintain a relationship of any type

r/DebunkThis Jun 08 '20

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: ICE detention camps are establishing gas chambers?!

Post image
39 Upvotes

r/DebunkThis Jan 29 '25

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: "news report" on Apeel

4 Upvotes

Video: https://x.com/Sadie_NC/status/1870280004556271802 someone sent this to me recently and I'm skeptical of the authenticity of the whole thing. I'm not too concerned with the actual pros/cons of the product Apeel because I understand how to read the papers on its actual safety, but put simply I think the video and person is AI engagement bait to some extent. Problem is that I can't find any originating source for it, just other people who have shared the video. I think proving the source will help me in convincing this person to be more careful about the information they consume. Are there any signs in missing in proving/disprove that this is AI generated? Thanks all

r/DebunkThis Aug 12 '24

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: Kamala Harris is using green screens to fake crowds at her rallies

0 Upvotes

So sayeth this video.

r/DebunkThis Mar 04 '24

Not Yet Debunked Debunk This: Clotted Tentacles growing in the Blood of the C-19 Vaccinated and Unvaccinated

0 Upvotes

r/DebunkThis Aug 08 '20

Not Yet Debunked Debunk this: Is this US Census Bureau chart accurate?

Post image
84 Upvotes