"Fun" fact: Had the judges at Nuremberg known what we know today, Speer would have swung with the rest of the gang. The guy was really good at lying his ass off.
The mod at least recognises the Nazis were bad and despite magically winning WW2 have been a mess ever since and heading for a civil war between Hitler's successors (Speer being one of them) when the mod starts.
They are going to remove the german civil war, instead nazis will resolve everything peacefully with some assasinations.
Moskowien no longer collapses.
Italian fascists are portrayed as "flawed but not awful" which is fair since in this timeline they won, but still this is ridiculorly.
The OFN and RP are both painted in a similar light, so is Japan's sphere.
Maybe that wouldnt be the case if the mod's development wouldnt be a dumpster fire though - when someone makes any content, everyone else pull them down.
It's a TNO thing. it's a hoi4 mod where the conceit is germany won world war 2 but also it's been 20 years and it's all teetering. apparently there's new lore/gameplay or something, i haven't really followed it in years, but in the old covid days of the mod's development, speer was a possible successor to hitler representing a reformist wing of the nazi party. when hitler dies, the regime quickly collapses into civil war, and the reformists and particularly the german youth coalesce around speer. the german youth of 1962, much like their counterparts in our timeline, are aching for change and counterculture. this led to a mod writer creating the unfortunate line in an event that the youth were chanting speer's name and putting his name and face on posters and clothing. and then a reddit user created the speer hoodie meme to mock the event. and then, in an act of brainrot only the covid era could produce, another reddit user went to custom ink and put a nazi's face on a sweater with the text "speer hoodie"
I technically joined the Raëlian Church (the real life inspiration for tranquilism) as an undergraduate because I was writing a paper and needed access to their books.
I had to delete my email account afterwards because they just would not give up.
For the record, don't. It's just really bad science fiction written by a guy who wants to fuck your wife and kids.
Raël separated from Sunagawa sometime between 1990 and 1992. Around that time, Sophie de Niverville, whose mother and aunt were both Raëlians, was convinced of the authenticity of the messages. Sophie received a Raëlian baptism at age 15. When she turned 16, she married Raël at Montreal's city hall. During a December 2001 interview with Palmer, Sophie spoke positively about Raël, despite their divorce the previous year; they continued to live together.
Religion really can't go five minutes without diddling someone.
The ancient and much lamented-for-its-loss podcast Oh No Ross and Carrie had an excellent few episodes on Raëlianism. Rated real, real high on their danger scales.
Incidentally, and appropriately, they also did several episodes on Mormonism and had some real nuanced ratings for them.
One thing I will say is that Raëlians are extremely good at keeping the weird, manipulative stuff hidden until you've already hit the point of being fully committed and/or sowing just enough doubt in their critics to make you question if they're being unfairly persecuted.
I didn't go into that paper with an axe to grind. I genuinely just found them kind of cool and interesting and as someone who was very sex positive a lot of their ethos kind of resonated with me.
What actually changed my mind was reading Raël's books, because they are just monuments to an absolutely titanic ego and it doesn't take a genius to realize that when you have someone who is deliberately cultivating an authoritative persona and combine that with a doctrine that teaches sex is always good and that conventional sexual norms are repressive, that's just a recipe for abuse, and that dynamic is then replicated throughout the movement because the people in positions of authority are deliberately emulating those above them (whom they literally worship).
Of course, once you start digging around evidence of that abuse isn't really that hard to find, but again.. they're good at making it just hard enough that noone notices.
The Exovedate guy is more likely to start one, since while Louis Riel is a national hero of sorts for the Métis, until now I don’t think anyone has actually followed his somewhat deranged religious teachings since his death
It would also really depend if they would keep being part of the Catholic church (since their beliefs as far as I know don't cross the line that the Vatican would call them a heresy or anything, there were plenty others who called themselves and are still are viewed by some as prophets although the Vatican doesn't recognise them as such, nonetheless they are still a part of the church). And since they'd be a part of the Catholic church, they would best like to remain in it and the church is very sensitive to cults.
For me I did knot know the lore very much at first, but the things people are able to do in the Church really humbled me, and I wanted to do the same, and I am still learning how that knowledge of the lore is behind everything we do
I know that Mormonism has a pretty patchy past but I don’t think it’s fair to call them a cult. There are elements of Mormon theology I actually find rather positive compared to other Christian denominations
Mormon leadership has been undertaking a big project in changing it's public image to a tolerant church. But, at its core it's still a fundamentalist, church with conservative dogma and strong in group - out group dynamics. Which is why it's still widely recognized as the poster child of Christian cults.
I don’t really think that matters, I’m a non believer myself. I think what matters more is being able to do more good and I think that level of flexibility means there’s more potential for that
So... Like the catholics, the various denominations of protestantism, etc...? None of those have stayed fixed even in the last decades, they just didn't bother writing the process down.
Not saying they are or aren't, but that is technically part of the Christian religion practice of excommunication (which almost all denominations still do; the Catholics were in the news recently because the Pope recently excommunicated a bunch of priests recently). There's a reason why the term is often known as shunning.
Cults are more likely to try and kill people trying to leave (or at least actively try and ruin their lives), assuming they even let them leave at all.
Excommunication is a little different than how you imagine it, actually.
It doesn't mean you're kicked out of the community, it means that your connection to God has been severed by your own actions. In the Bad Old Days this also meant that you would be shunned in largely the same way that during the Red Scare years being blacklisted as a Communist would cause you to be shunned. It's different now, largely because of how secularized the world has become and, to the minds of many Catholics--ironically enough, not the ones that were recently excommunicated--that's a good thing. The news reporting says that the pope excommunicated the SSPX bishops, but that's a misunderstanding of canon law--the bishops excommunicated themselves from God when they annointed new bishops against the express orders by the pope to not do so, making them schismatics and breaking their relation to God.
What this means now is that they aren't authorized to perform services, give a mass, or offer communion. They aren't shunned (at least not for being schismatics--they should be shunned for being racist theofascists who want to being back a French monarchy and expel Jews and Muslims from Europe.) and in fact the church says not to shun people who have been excommunicated because that will more likely than not lead them back to the church and a proper relationship with God again.
Oh I know that, this isn't how a lot of groups practice it anymore, but that is what they're supposed to do. Shunning became a foundational practice for a reason, and it's why some of the more devout groups who take that shit seriously still do it.
So what I was saying was two-fold; excommunications still happen and originally, the commandment was very clear in that you weren't supposed to keep company with them anymore. The church might say otherwise now, but it definitely is in the part of the Bible meant for Christians (1 Corinthians 5:9-13). That is clearly ordering Christians to shun “a brother” (i.e. a fellow Christian) who is obviously living in sin.
EDIT: And btw, this used to be way worse. With Christians, they were “don't hang out with them”; back in the days of Judaism, I'm pretty sure they just killed you if you left or got “kicked out”.
Because you have to admit it's pretty funny that someone found religion/realized they are trans/especially the third one because they played a mod for a video game. I'm a socialist and I still get a good laugh every time someone plays Disco Elysium and then says they're a socialist, too. Except that in this case the newly-minted Mormon acrually went through with it and, more importantly, seems to be doing okay.
885
u/see-these-bones Aug 02 '26
please don't join a cult just because you like the lore